Go Back   DefensiveCarry Concealed Carry Forum > Carry Discussion > Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics
Register Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read
Forum Donations DefensiveCarry Store DefensiveCarry Gallery USGO Gallery Related Links Forum Help & Extras

Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics Discussion of defensive and concealed carry ammunition, ballisitics and reloading.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old March 23rd, 2008, 10:26 PM   #31
Distinguished Member
 
crzy4guns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Kansas
Posts: 1,332
crzy4guns is a forum contributor
The .38 special does indeed have the edge in ballistics, but if you will read any of the work that Marshall and Sanow, two former police officers, put into their books on stopping power you will find that both calibers are in a virtual tie. That being the case I went with the .380 Walther PPK/s because of the greater firepower and the ease of reloading with a magazine. I liked the way it conceals better, for me anyway, because it is flatter than a S&W 642 .38 revolver I used to own. However both are not that hard to conceal. If recoil is the problem try standard pressure loads instead of the +P's. I had originally started with a 1911 clone and found that it was too heavy to carry all the time. I say carry the one that you think will be with you all of the time. A good .38 snubnose or a .380 auto beats a 1911 .45 left at home or in the car any day of the week. Just my .02 worth. Woo that was a long winded reply.

Last edited by crzy4guns; March 24th, 2008 at 01:39 PM.
crzy4guns is offline  
Old March 24th, 2008, 01:45 AM   #32
Assistant Administrator
 
QKShooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Off Of The X
Posts: 19,960
QKShooter is a forum contributor
"The lightweight snubbies (which I'll never use) will rip your hand off when fired."

The perception of the recoil is a bit stout but, it's honestly not nearly that bad at all.
__________________
QKShooter is offline  
Old March 24th, 2008, 09:43 PM   #33
Member
 
RJ Stewart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 47
RJ Stewart
We might factor in price also. I believe it's more economical to shoot .38 Special than .380.

I've found a Taurus 651 .357 at a local shop, and it would conceal much better, being a snubnose with a shrouded hammer. I'm thinking about getting it for a pocket gun and only shooting 38 Specials in it, carrying Remington GS +P's. I would think a steel snubnose designed for the .357 would fire the .38 quite nicely, and be very controllable.

Oh, and the "almost rip your hand off" was from personal experience, not just a statement. I owned a SW 642 for a short time, and had to sell it because it was way too painful for my arthritic hands to fire. It did indeed feel pretty bad. Maybe not "ripping my hand off" bad, but too uncomfortable to ever shoot regularly. I'll never own another scandium snubbie.
__________________
Robert John Stewart, The Lost King of Scotland
RJ Stewart is offline  
Old March 24th, 2008, 10:07 PM   #34
VIP Member
 
AZ Husker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 2,746
AZ Husker is a forum contributor
RJ, you weenie! My girlfriend shoots a 642 with +P's! The soft LaserGrips do help though. Arthritis is a terrible affliction for shooting!
__________________
Treat me good, I'll treat you better. Treat me bad, I'll treat you worse.
AZ Husker is offline  
Old March 25th, 2008, 11:06 AM   #35
Member
 
Breakdaddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 257
Breakdaddy
I think it's pretty much been covered already but I agree that in a similar platform the .38 is a superior performer. I feel that the 9mm +P trumps either in a similar platform which is why I pocket carry a Kahr PM9.
Breakdaddy is offline  
Old March 25th, 2008, 05:55 PM   #36
Distinguished Member
 
crzy4guns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Kansas
Posts: 1,332
crzy4guns is a forum contributor
The Kahr PM9 does indeed trump and render both the .38 snubnose and the .380 auto obsolete. In fact I am thinking of getting one myself come to think of it.
crzy4guns is offline  
Old March 25th, 2008, 07:04 PM   #37
Distinguished Member
 
Ridgeline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,294
Ridgeline
I have a J-frame 38 and a Walther PPK 380, I will sometime carry one of these when "I'm not carrying". But with that said I would likey pick up my BHP 40 and be done with it. And all of there are much better than tossing rocks. What will see you thru is training, training and more training.
__________________
"Eternity is Too Long to be Wrong"

Texas CHL Instructor & Holder
Life Member NRA
Member TSRA
Ridgeline is offline  
Old March 26th, 2008, 02:58 AM   #38
Member
 
Metro 40's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Midwest USA
Posts: 385
Metro 40
Quote:
Originally Posted by tns0038 View Post
Very few 38 small frame pistols out there that are rated for +P. Even the ones that are, will give you a generous amount of recoil. Thus eliminating a rapid second shot, that I consider to be far more important then the ballistics of the round.
Actually, the opposite is true. There are very few (if any) modern 38 snubs that are NOT +P rated. I can't even think of any. Even the less expensive Rossi is +P rated.

+P is no big deal, anyway. The old loadings of standard factory .38 special ammo were hotter than today's so called "+P" stuff.

A small pocket pistol or revolver is for close-up work. I'll take the reliability of a good .38 snub over any .380, any day of the week. The .38 will work from inside a pocket, it will work pressed up against the bad guy's torso, it is not subject to limp wristing, and it throws 158 grain bullet at the same velocity or greater than a .380 throws a 95 grain bullet.

Recoil is not pleasant when target shooting with a lightweight snub, but in a self-defense situation, you will not notice the recoil nearly as much. In many police shootings, officers were surprised that their pistols only "popped" instead of the usual "bang" that they were used to at the range, to the point that those officers initially thought that they had bad, underpowered ammo!
__________________
"Fast is fine, but accuracy is everything." Wyatt Earp
Metro 40 is offline  
Old March 27th, 2008, 06:03 PM   #39
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Escalon, CA
Posts: 335
Dusty Miller
Quote:
Originally Posted by homepcmd View Post
Has the person ever fired a 2" revolver with +p "kick hard but also rip your hand off" recoil?

On WHAT planet?!!!
Dusty Miller is offline  
Old March 27th, 2008, 06:08 PM   #40
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Escalon, CA
Posts: 335
Dusty Miller
Quote:
Originally Posted by RJ Stewart View Post
The lightweight snubbies (which I'll never use) will rip your hand off when fired.

HO-chee-MAMA!! I'm sure glad I shoot a .357 magnum instead!!
Dusty Miller is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:52 AM.


bestBest selection of rifle scopes, holsters, belts, pouches, gun accessories, gun cases, dry boxes, flashlights, night vision, binoculars, sunglasses. Information and 1000's of military, law enforcement, tactical gear from OpticsPlanet and Tactical Store w/ FREE UPS! Top brands - 5.11, Bianchi, BlackHawk, Bushnell, EOT ech, Leupold, Pelican, Galco, Fobus, Safariland, Steiner, StreamLight, SureFire, Nikon, Trijicon, UnderArmour, Uncle Mike's, Wiley X,

Hosted ByTranquil Hosting

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright DefensiveCarry.com © 2004-2008