Go Back   DefensiveCarry Concealed Carry Forum > Concealed Carry Discussion > Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics
Register Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read
Forum Donations DefensiveCarry Store DefensiveCarry Gallery USGO Gallery Related Links Forum Help & Extras

Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics Discussion of defensive and concealed carry ammunition, ballisitics and reloading.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old April 26th, 2008, 06:25 PM   #1
Distinguished Member
 
exactlymypoint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,386
exactlymypoint is a forum contributor
Creating a new 9mm

If you look at actual diameters, the .380, .357, .38 and 9mm are all essentially the same. The only difference is in bullet weight and the speed in which the cartridge travels.

There are some who think heavier and slower is better than smaller and faster. The .45 is a heavy and slow projectile. The 9mm is a lighter and faster projectile. Although I am not certain on this, I am thinking that 9 mm bullet is shorter and there is more gunpowder in the case allowing it to go faster.

Why wouldn't it be possible to create a heavier 9mm bullet, put less gunpowder in the casing and get the heavier and slower characteristics from the new cartridge? (I am assuming we use the same cartridge diameter so it will work in current handguns.)

I know there are a lot of factors involved in cartridge creation. Someone has had to have experimented with this idea. Why is this not an option?
__________________
  • Let me explain. No. There is not time. Let me summarize.
  • Doing my part to create a huge carbon footprint
  • Be still, and know that I am God; Psalms 46:10
  • I am not by nature a humble man, sir, but circumstances sometimes require a change of habits - John Adams to Thomas Jefferson
exactlymypoint is offline  
Old April 26th, 2008, 07:12 PM   #2
VIP Member
 
HotGuns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 4,658
HotGuns is a forum contributor
Its been done.
The 147 grain bullet has been loaded to subsonic velocitys. This was done originally to increase functional reliability in suppressed weapons.

It works...buts its still just a 9mm hole.

Think about it. A subsonic 230 grain bullet with a larger diameter or a subsonic 147 with a smaller diameter.
Which one hits harder?

Physics prove that the .45 is better.

Of course, either one will kill you.
__________________
AR. CHL Instr.

To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men, their individualism, loyalty to family traditions, national patriotism, and religious dogmas.'
Dr. G. Brock Chisolm
HotGuns is online now  
Old April 26th, 2008, 07:19 PM   #3
Member
 
nuparadigm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 126
nuparadigm
Your question bears upon what is known in exterior ballistics as "sectional density". For the lay person, SD is a mathematical formula deriving a specific number that is generally used to equate that bullets ability to penetrate through a given medium. This formula is based on mass and the bullets cross-sectional area.

It is calculated with this formula:

Sectional Density =(Bullet wt. in grains)
7000 x ((bullet dia. In inches) x (bullet dia. In inches))

e.g. a 30 caliber bullet weighing 165 gr.

165gr / 7000 x ((.308 x .308)) = 165 / 664.048 = .248

This formula is based on mass and the bullets cross-sectional area. It does not take into account the shape of the bullet, the materials the bullet is made from, the construction of the bullet nor the velocity that this bullet will traveling on contacting your intended target. Thus any bullet with the same weight and diameter will have the same Sectional Density.

What you're looking for is increased sectional density with about the same bearing surface as lighter weight projectiles. As HotGuns has said, it's already been done with the 147 gr. 9X19mm bullet.
__________________
The Edge ... there's no honest way to describe it. The only ones who know where it is have gone over.
nuparadigm is offline  
Old April 26th, 2008, 07:27 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
stormbringerr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Capitol City, Texas
Posts: 850
stormbringerr is a forum contributor
Quote:
Originally Posted by HotGuns View Post
Its been done.
The 147 grain bullet has been loaded to subsonic velocitys. This was done originally to increase functional reliability in suppressed weapons.

It works...buts its still just a 9mm hole.

Think about it. A subsonic 230 grain bullet with a larger diameter or a subsonic 147 with a smaller diameter.
Which one hits harder?

Physics prove that the .45 is better.

Of course, either one will kill you.
i started to mention that too,since i use 9mm,147gr. in my carry gun.
__________________
later ,Stormbringerr

The obstacle is the path. - Zen Proverb

------------------------------------------------------
stormbringerr is offline  
Old May 8th, 2008, 04:11 PM   #5
New Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 8
SAXDNINE
So I guess another analogy would be being hit with a one ton car at 60 mph vs a two ton car at 30 mph?
SAXDNINE is offline  
Old May 20th, 2008, 09:11 AM   #6
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 13
RichardB
There used to be 200 gn .38 specials. In the real world they did not sucessfully compete for police uses after the new HP- faster and lighter - bullets became available. A very high speed 38 is also known as the 357 magnum?
RichardB is offline  
Old May 21st, 2008, 04:20 PM   #7
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: NEPA
Posts: 45
mchaley
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardB View Post
There used to be 200 gn .38 specials. In the real world they did not sucessfully compete for police uses after the new HP- faster and lighter - bullets became available. A very high speed 38 is also known as the 357 magnum?
Negative. They're not the same diameter.
Also another reason for lighter/faster is gravity. Heavy/slow will drop sooner and faster than lighter/faster. For 10 feet and under that wont matter though.
mchaley is offline  
Old May 22nd, 2008, 09:00 AM   #8
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 13
RichardB
The 357 magnum is a much hotter version of the 38 special. The cartridge is longer so that it can't be inserted into 38 special handguns. The bullet diameters for both are .357 inches. The 9mm Luger/Parabellum's diameter is .355 inches; the .380's is .356 inches.

This is a link to a website that is hosted by a retired police officer and discusses the 200 gn bullet. StoppingPower.net Forums - Western / Winchester .38 special 200 gr RN

At hand gun range with newer gun powders, I don't think the drop of a heavy bullet would be significant enough to require much consideration.

Regards,
Richard
RichardB is offline  
Old May 23rd, 2008, 10:33 AM   #9
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Warrenton, VA
Posts: 177
vashooter
Of course, if light, fast bullets are better than light slow bullets, than wouldn't it be best to have heavy, fast bullets? i.e. 45 ACP 230 gr +P rounds? Or the 10mm Auto?
It's all a trade game - you go big, heavy, & fast you're going to have more recoil and less controlability as well as less capacity in the magazine/cylinder. I think that with modern design hollow points, any round from 9mm on up will get the job done with proper shot placement - hopefully because in the end analysis, a pistol round is a poor defensive weapon no matter how you look at it compared to a rifle round or shotgun.
vashooter is offline  
Old May 23rd, 2008, 10:51 AM   #10
Senior Member
 
tns0038's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,114
tns0038
Quote:
Originally Posted by vashooter View Post
Of course, if light, fast bullets are better than light slow bullets, than wouldn't it be best to have heavy, fast bullets? i.e. 45 ACP 230 gr +P rounds? Or the 10mm Auto?
Sure, but who could handel the recoil, quickly for a double tap.
tns0038 is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:17 PM.


Hosted ByTranquil Hosting

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright DefensiveCarry.com © 2004-2008