Go Back   DefensiveCarry Concealed Carry Forum > Concealed Carry Discussion > Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics
Register Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read
Forum Donations DefensiveCarry Store DefensiveCarry Gallery USGO Gallery Related Links Forum Help & Extras

Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics Discussion of defensive and concealed carry ammunition, ballisitics and reloading.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old June 10th, 2008, 05:55 AM   #41
Senior Member
 
Sticks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 815
Sticks
Quote:
Originally Posted by LongRider View Post
After posting Sticks pic on a THR thread. I decided to follow Sticks fine example and I did my own tests. Using my XD.45 compact (4 inch barrel) from 15 feet into three one gallon milk jugs. I had 15 jugs for five tests. Every one of the rounds looked identical to the other. HST remains the most consistent expanding & penetrating and most accurate round...
So, how many jugs before they stopped? I am curious to the comparison of the two rounds. Obviously yours cover the quarter and then some, whereas the .40 almost did.

Right now I am bummed, I cannot find my little trophies. I misplaced the darn things.
__________________
Sticks
Curiosity was framed, poor judgment killed the cat

911 is just part of the procedure for filing paperwork

Three can keep a secret if two are dead
Sticks is offline  
Old June 10th, 2008, 02:49 PM   #42
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: texas
Posts: 2,997
dukalmighty
I carry HST in 230grn+P 45ACP and 124 grn 9mm,I'm shooting the 9mm out of a keltec P11 and don't think the +p will be as manageable ,I might be wrong but good shot placement + good ammo =good results
__________________
I like Poetry,Long Walks On The Beach,And Poking Dead Things With A Stick
dukalmighty is offline  
Old June 11th, 2008, 08:48 PM   #43
Distinguished Member
 
LongRider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Washington
Posts: 1,279
LongRider
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sticks View Post
So, how many jugs before they stopped? I am curious to the comparison of the two rounds. Obviously yours cover the quarter and then some, whereas the .40 almost did.

Right now I am bummed, I cannot find my little trophies. I misplaced the darn things.
On three of them the bullet made it into the third jug. On the first two the bullet went through two jugs and put a big dent in the third and hit them with enough force that the cap broke apart like the water blasted through the top. In all five shots the first jug looks like it just exploded. The .45 was just barely larger than a quarter the tips went just past the edge not really much bigger than your .40 Imagining what that would look like going through human flesh is just plain creepy. Thinking about being hit with one of these makes my skin crawl. Still want to do some tests with a bullet tube but I have to wait now that I just spent a bunch on more ammo. Ordered some Rangers for my wifes Bersa too, so will be testing those too soon.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dukalmighty View Post
I might be wrong but good shot placement + good ammo =good results
Well I for one am hoping you are right or I am an idiot
__________________
Those who would, deny, require permit, license, certification, or authorization for me to bear arms are as dangerous & evil as those who would molest, abuse, assault, rape or murder my family

250,000 dead from chemical warfare in mass graves is not evidence of WMD
LongRider is online now  
Old June 12th, 2008, 10:27 PM   #44
Senior Member
 
grady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Near St. Louis, Missouri
Posts: 872
grady is a forum contributor
Thanks to those who posted info on the Federal HST's.

I've made two orders already of HST's, and I expect many more to come.
grady is online now  
Old June 13th, 2008, 01:49 AM   #45
Distinguished Member
 
LongRider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Washington
Posts: 1,279
LongRider
Quote:
Originally Posted by grady View Post
Thanks to those who posted info on the Federal HST's.

I've made two orders already of HST's, and I expect many more to come.
Expensive suckers but not nearly as bad as some of the other premium sounds. Which I do not think perform as well. So I suppose a good deal all things considered. I was thinking of doing a group buy but even at 500 rounds through Ammunition To Go the savings are not that great. They do have I think 250 round packages of .380 Remington Golden Sabers for $65 which is a great deal IMO. But I had already ordered Rangers for the wifes Bersa. May still pick those up though depending on how the Rangers look after I test a few rounds. I did like the Golden Sabers in .45 almost as much as the HST.
__________________
Those who would, deny, require permit, license, certification, or authorization for me to bear arms are as dangerous & evil as those who would molest, abuse, assault, rape or murder my family

250,000 dead from chemical warfare in mass graves is not evidence of WMD
LongRider is online now  
Old June 15th, 2008, 05:47 AM   #46
Distinguished Member
 
LongRider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Washington
Posts: 1,279
LongRider
Quote:
Originally Posted by TacticalCompact View Post
I'd like to see pics of those HSTs next to some Winchester Ranger SXT LE rounds...
Did you look at the Ballistic Tests Index
9mm Ballistic Test # 1
And the results.............
Round 3 - 9mm JHP's through Tshirts
Denim testing 9mm, .45ACP, 357 magnum

Those are the best side by side pics / tests I have found. Mostly 9mm but still I think it gives a fair example of what to expect out of a specific brand / make
__________________
Those who would, deny, require permit, license, certification, or authorization for me to bear arms are as dangerous & evil as those who would molest, abuse, assault, rape or murder my family

250,000 dead from chemical warfare in mass graves is not evidence of WMD
LongRider is online now  
Old June 15th, 2008, 07:13 AM   #47
Senior Member
 
grady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Near St. Louis, Missouri
Posts: 872
grady is a forum contributor
Quote:
Originally Posted by LongRider View Post
Expensive suckers but not nearly as bad as some of the other premium sounds. Which I do not think perform as well. So I suppose a good deal all things considered. I was thinking of doing a group buy but even at 500 rounds through Ammunition To Go the savings are not that great. They do have I think 250 round packages of .380 Remington Golden Sabers for $65 which is a great deal IMO. But I had already ordered Rangers for the wifes Bersa. May still pick those up though depending on how the Rangers look after I test a few rounds. I did like the Golden Sabers in .45 almost as much as the HST.
That's a huge savings for the .380 Golden Sabers. I'll have to check that out.

As far as the cost of the HST's, once I completely finish reliability testing and purchase a stockpile, I'll find a cheaper practice round.

I read this entire thread but it's been awhile, and you may have covered this already, but did you test the HST vs. the HST +P? Which do you prefer?

I had planned to use the HST, but when I tested both, I was a little more accurate with the +P. My theory is that the bullet went downrange quicker and thus any bad shooting habits of mine had less time to affect the path of the bullet.

What do you think? I suppose +P's will wear the spring a little more, but I don't shoot a lot right now. I'm trying to buy as many supplies (guns and bullets) before the election. What's your opinion on the HST standard pressure vs. the HST +P?
grady is online now  
Old June 15th, 2008, 03:44 PM   #48
Distinguished Member
 
LongRider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Washington
Posts: 1,279
LongRider
Quote:
Originally Posted by grady View Post
I had planned to use the HST, but when I tested both, I was a little more accurate with the +P.
Looks like you answered your own question Springs are easily replaceable lives are harder to come by. IMO always go with what is more accurate out of your gun placement takes priority over a bullets performance. As you know .22 FMJ that you hit COM with is far better than the howitzer you miss with
__________________
Those who would, deny, require permit, license, certification, or authorization for me to bear arms are as dangerous & evil as those who would molest, abuse, assault, rape or murder my family

250,000 dead from chemical warfare in mass graves is not evidence of WMD
LongRider is online now  
Old June 15th, 2008, 05:35 PM   #49
Senior Member
 
grady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Near St. Louis, Missouri
Posts: 872
grady is a forum contributor
Quote:
Originally Posted by LongRider View Post
IMO always go with what is more accurate out of your gun
When you say it like that, it seems all too obvious what the right choice is. Guess I couldn't see the forest for the trees. Thanks for setting me straight.

I have read lots of posts stating standard pressure is just fine, and I was concerned about premature wear on a gun, plus a prosecutor making a big deal about +P being "the most powerful, destructive bullet you could find."

But you are entirely correct saying springs can be replaced, and shot placement being key. I'm not THAT much more accurate with +P's, maybe shrinking my groups 3/4" at 7 yards, but that might be enough to end a fight quicker. And at further distances, the margin of error grows.

Don't know what I was thinking. I've got 100 rounds of each to continue testing, so when I'm done, I'll carry whatever is more accurate regardless of what it is.

As far as the potential of a prosecutor making a big deal out of bullet choice and possibly getting a bad jury after a good self-defense shooting, I subscribe to Gabe Suarez's thoughts on the matter: "Being broke or in prison is temporary. Being dead isn't."
grady is online now  
Old June 15th, 2008, 10:11 PM   #50
Senior Member
 
Sticks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 815
Sticks
Quote:
Originally Posted by grady View Post
...plus a prosecutor making a big deal about +P being "the most powerful, destructive bullet you could find."
...

As far as the potential of a prosecutor making a big deal out of bullet choice and possibly getting a bad jury after a good self-defense shooting, I subscribe to Gabe Suarez's thoughts on the matter: "Being broke or in prison is temporary. Being dead isn't."
It's an obscene thought, unlikely and Hollywoodish in it's concept (especially when referring to 9mm) and yet frighteningly possible.

I would be hard put to keep from saying "You would rather I stopped the perpetrator, with a long violent criminal history, from killing my wife and myself with a squirt gun, hoping on the off chance he was allergic to water or hydrophobic? If only shark repellent worked so well on lawyers."
__________________
Sticks
Curiosity was framed, poor judgment killed the cat

911 is just part of the procedure for filing paperwork

Three can keep a secret if two are dead
Sticks is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:32 PM.


Hosted ByTranquil Hosting

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright DefensiveCarry.com © 2004-2008