Go Back   DefensiveCarry Concealed Carry Forum > Concealed Carry Discussion > Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read
Forum Donations DefensiveCarry Store DefensiveCarry Gallery USGO Gallery Related Links Forum Help & Extras

Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics Discussion of defensive and concealed carry ammunition, ballisitics and reloading.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old May 7th, 2008, 09:03 PM   #11
billfromtx
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 47
billfromtx
[quote=Rmac58;716866]IIUC, a faster .38 round will not do more damage than a standard .38, or do I have the wrong impression?
QUOTE]

Velocity and weight equals ENERGY...which translates into tissue damage and stopping power.
__________________
USMC 1984-1992
To err is human.
To forgive is divine.
Neither of which is Marine Corps policy.

"It's all about shot placement."- David (Slayer of Goliath)
billfromtx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 7th, 2008, 10:58 PM   #12
1911packer
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Georgia
Posts: 337
1911packer
Quote:
Originally Posted by crzy4guns View Post
+P's in 45 are NOT necessary.
Why not? As wonderful as the .45 is, it is still a handgun, falling far short of the performance of most rifles and even the .357.

For me, the +P is the same price, I can put rounds on target just as effectively as with standard pressure and it gives me a bit more velocity to help with the expansion and penetration.

If there has been any improvement in Mr. Browning's excellent design in the past 100 years, it has been the production of 1911s that can reliably handle +P hollow points. So, why not take advantage of the improved ammo?

I'm just curious as to what I'm missing here.
1911packer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 8th, 2008, 07:15 PM   #13
Dusty Miller
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Escalon, CA
Posts: 335
Dusty Miller
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rmac58 View Post
IIUC, a faster .38 round will not do more damage than a standard .38, or do I have the wrong impression?

The .357mag shoots the same bullet and I believe it is a superior stopper due to a bullet velocity in the 1200+ fps range.
Dusty Miller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 10th, 2008, 12:52 AM   #14
1911packer
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Georgia
Posts: 337
1911packer
I'm not wanting to be argumentative or be a smart a**. I REALLY want to know the downside to carrying .45 +P. It might change my mind.

I can see the problem with a lightweight firearm or for someone who is recoil sensitive.
1911packer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 10th, 2008, 02:28 PM   #15
Siddigger
New Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1
Siddigger
This is my first quote so take it with a grain of salt. Nothing will expand in a .38. I feel accuracy is paramount and do not want to go through the house next door. You only want to hit your target. 3 accurate shots are better than one +P any day. That leaves +P out for me in any caliber. I carry lead flat nose SWC in my light weight .38 if not carrying my .45 commander. You can talk all you want about speed, energy and power. That does not take into account a slower flat nose's immediate on the spot energy transfer in real world. Shoot a cat with 22 hollow points. Better have a box handy. No sound of a hit. Shoot it with a lead flat point ( I have a jig and file, but there is SGB by CCI but it is not as flat as I like ) You hear the loud smack (neat) and it drops.
Siddigger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 13th, 2008, 06:51 AM   #16
maclean3
VIP Member
 
maclean3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 2,697
maclean3 is a forum contributor
Sort of a side note but I've noticed I'm getting a LOT of bullet setback with the 230gr. Speer Gold Dot in my 1911. It's just from doing press checks when I pick it up or carry it (like I do with all my guns) and from rechambering rounds after cleanings. It may be a phenomenal round but I'm dumping these and going back to something with a heavy crimp for my auto loaders, most likely Rem. Golden Sabers.

And no, I use standard pressure .230gr loads in my .45s. I like the "slow and heavy" rounds in my 1911s. I still default to 124gr. +P in my 9mm though.
Jack
__________________
"The sheep are everywhere. We are raising up a nation of cannon fodder types and we are screwed."
HotGuns
maclean3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:27 AM.


Hosted ByTranquil Hosting

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright DefensiveCarry.com © 2004-2008