|
|
|||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
| Forum Donations | DefensiveCarry Store | DefensiveCarry Gallery | USGO Gallery | Related Links | Forum Help & Extras |
| Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics Discussion of defensive and concealed carry ammunition, ballisitics and reloading. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 235
![]() |
Here are the specs on the Corbon JHP 380 and the DPX 380...
JHP: 90 GR. 1050 FPS 220 FTLBS DPX: 80 GR. 1050 FPS 196 FTLBS I stood in the store with both cartridges in my hand. The DPX has a deeper core, which makes sense why it would have a larger expansion, but I don't get how it could penetrate more. Can someone explain to me how the DPX bullet is supposed to penetrate deeper when it has less energy and is a lighter grain than the regular JHP?
__________________
Keep emotionally active. Cater to your favorite neurosis.
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: May 2008
Location: Boise ID
Posts: 74
![]() |
Makes little sense from a physics standpoint. Might be because the bullet is all copper? I know the Barnes X bullets are great. They are very pricey, I use them to reload for 7 Mag and 300 Win Mag. They do their job, but I am not familiar with the handgun bullets.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
New Member
![]() Join Date: May 2008
Location: Vermont
Posts: 11
![]() |
Simple, the DPX will weigh 80grn, when shot, 80 grn, after impact, and 80 grn when it stops.
The copper/lead JHP will weigh 90 when shot, <90 after impact, and <<90 when it stops. So it is shedding energy as it sheds mass due to the bullet breaking up. Kevin |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 197
![]() |
I had the opportunity to try a box of Corbon DPX in my Sig P232 this weekend. Reliability was flawless. Accuracy was lacking. 5" group at 7 yards. The DPX rounds were very inconsistant. I'll stick with Federal Hydrashok and Remington Golden Saber for now. Accuracy is most important in my book.
Last edited by ctr; May 18th, 2008 at 03:34 PM. Reason: spelling |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 235
![]() |
I actually liked the DPX. They were plenty accurate, and very easy to shoot. Recoil is very mild. No jamming problems at all. But I was only punching holes in paper, so I don't know the actual penetration/expansion capabilities first hand.
I did find a bunch of internet articles and postings that say it does penetrate quite well though.
__________________
Keep emotionally active. Cater to your favorite neurosis.
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|