|
|
|||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
| Forum Donations | DefensiveCarry Store | DefensiveCarry Gallery | USGO Gallery | Related Links | Forum Help & Extras |
| Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics Discussion of defensive and concealed carry ammunition, ballisitics and reloading. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: May 2007
Location: North Texas
Posts: 1,151
![]() |
Effectiveness of .357 With 125 Grain Bullets
Has too much been made of the "stopping" capability of 125 grain JHP bullets in the .357 Magnum cartridge?
Seems that for many years now the "three-fifty-seven-Magnum-with-125-grain-bullets" reflexively rolls off the tongue when the .357 Magnum cartridge or indeed when relative "stopping power" of handgun cartridges is discussed. I have to ask, why not 124 grain bullets or 126 grain bullets? What's so magical about this bullet weight? There's many different brands of 125 grain .357 Magnum ammunition and many more of 125 grain component bullets for hand loaders. All these bullets certainly will not perform to the same level. It's reasonable to expect that some certain other bullets that fall elsewhere within the range of bullet weights generally offered for the .357 magnum would out perform some of the 125 grain bullet offerings. Yet so many tout the "125 grain bullet" as the only "learned" response to any discussion of handgun effectiveness. I don't tote the .357 Magnum but if I did I'd carry it stoked with somewhat heavier bullets. Also I suppose that I actually have rather low expectations of handgun effectiveness generally and little belief in a magic pill. Has the .357 Magnum with 125 grain bullets taken on a life of its own in print and on Internet forums? It appears that it's reputation is made by "conventional wisdom" as much as anything else. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 503
![]() |
I would say it is pretty dorn effective.
357 Magnum Stopping Power |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: May 2007
Location: North Texas
Posts: 1,151
![]() |
What if one considers that all this percentage business connected with one shot "stops" isn't necessarily predictive of the outcome of a gunfight?
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,177
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: minnesota
Posts: 143
![]() |
Quote:
Which disproves that it's a myth, and has taken on a life of it's own. Personally, I like the 125grn. I've seen how it works on 4-legged problems, and it puts the target down with authority. I have no doubt that it would work just as well on something with 2 less legs.
__________________
One man's theology is another man's belly laugh. --RAH |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: May 2007
Location: North Texas
Posts: 1,151
![]() |
Any 125 grain bullet? Which 125 grain bullet?
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Distinguished Member
![]() Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: State of Discombobulation
Posts: 1,934
![]() |
Quote:
I do think a bit of "myth" has developed around the 125 Grain bullet, but only because it works so well. I dealt with a man last year that I wouldn't want to meet in a dark alley with anything other than a longarm and a lot of distance, he was that scary to me, and I deal with badguys daily that scare the bejesus out of most people on a daily basis. I went back to packing the 125 Grain .357 Magnum, in two guns off duty, to make up for the lack of capacity. I've found it to be a very accurate caliber/load that I enjoy shooting that will do the job if I do my part. Sometimes we can't explain why something works, we just know it does. I'm OK with that as I want results and I'm from the school of the Jesuits, "The end justifies the means." There are other loads/calibers that work too. The advantage of the .357 Magnum with the 125 Grain load is that it was the one that attained the rank of "King of the Street" first, and has yet to be surpassed. If one can shoot this load, and is willing to deal with the lack of capacity and slow reloading, I think it's a good load to carry. I do think however too many people are carrying it that should be carrying a softer shooting load. I'm not trying to brag or anything, but I have shot and learned how to shoot this load for years, but it has taken me a lot of practice to get to where I'm at. Very good question sir, and one that makes a person think. I find nothing wrong with other loads/calibers, like the 158 Grain 38 Special, as it's all up to the shooter to put the bullets where they need to be. I just want the hardest hitting "hammer" I can effectively control if I am given a choice. Biker ![]()
__________________
"The road to Hell is paved with good intentions." |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: PA
Posts: 646
![]() |
As good as it is or may be, I won't trade 2 rounds of 124+p 9mm for one 125gr .357 round. If I went back to packing a .357, I'd carry the Rem or Fed versions. I'd also feel comfortable with the 140-145 grain weights. I don't care for the nuetered versions loaded with wonder bullets that don't give you anything more than a warm 9mm.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: minnesota
Posts: 143
![]() |
I've used both Remington 125 SJHPs and 125 Golden Sabers with good effect. I would expect similar results from a like round from Federal or Winchester...it's just that my local place used to mainly carry Remington ammo.
__________________
One man's theology is another man's belly laugh. --RAH |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 29
![]() |
I have a S&W model 60 with 2 inch barrel in 357. I have shot 125, 158, and 180 grain out of it and the 125 is much easier to shoot and get off a follow up shot...maybe that's why it's the best??? Works for me :)
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|