Go Back   DefensiveCarry Concealed Carry Forum > Carry Discussion > Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics
Register Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read
Forum Donations DefensiveCarry Store DefensiveCarry Gallery USGO Gallery Related Links Forum Help & Extras

Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics Discussion of defensive and concealed carry ammunition, ballisitics and reloading.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old February 21st, 2006, 05:30 PM   #1
Member
 
SCOTTY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 24
SCOTTY
45 acp question

I've recently bought me a Taurus 24/7 45. for carry, right now I have it loaded with Rem 230 grain golden sabres I just picked up a box of Rem. UMC 230 grain hollowpoints at Walmart 100 rounds for 25 bucks " For target practice"

I was just wondering what you 45 shooters opinions on the light 185 grain "fast" versus the 230 grain for neutralizing a threat .

Oh and does anyone know anything about the UMC ammo are the hollowpoints used in any of there other ammo I would much rather keep it loaded with those if thats the cartridge I shoot mostly for practice, Half the price! But then again maybe you get what you pay for .
SCOTTY is offline  
Old February 21st, 2006, 05:41 PM   #2
Member
 
Gelicious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Toledo, Oregon
Posts: 360
Gelicious
Scotty, Most of your incounters with "BGS" will be in close quarters combat. a 230gr bullet has alot more punch to it than a lighter faster bullet. If you did plan on taking a shot at something that was further away then conside that the 230gr bullet is still in the 800-1000fps range at 15 yards. Its i guess just your choice, the lighter bullet might have a slightly less intense recoil but im not 100% on that.

As for the hollow point. I have done my own expantion test on a box of golden saber, speer gold dot, and horandy T.A.P and found that the Gold dot expanded perfectly every shot and the Horandy T.A.P expanded perfectly 99.0 percent of the time. Only once did the hornady not expand well and that was out of 50 rounds. The golden sabers did ok but had some failure to expands in there. The hollow point debate is alive and well on these boards so check around and see for youself what others are saying but nothing writen on these boards should make you mind up for you.. you should do some tests yourself. If the hollow point feeds well in your gun and it expands as expected, then go with it! I use the gold dots and the hornady T.A.P ammo. Im still waiting on my CCW to show in the mail so im not packing them around yet.

Good luck and I hope you find your answers!
__________________
I carry because I care.
"An armed man is a citizen. An unarmed man is a subject."
"Cling to the Father and His Holy name, and don't go riding on the Long Black Train" - Josh Turner
Gelicious is offline  
Old February 21st, 2006, 05:45 PM   #3
Assistant Administrator
 
P95Carry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: South West PA
Posts: 25,366
P95Carry is a forum contributor
I still have a full box of the UMC FMJ - 230 grainers. I have not used them yet or even tried any. Other UMC ammo I have had seemed to work OK and of course yes, price is lower than some stuff. I do seem to remember what I did shoot (FMJ) was very messy!

The bullet design appears pretty fair but not sure whose bullet is used - it is similar to a GD, in some ways. Others may know.

Providing ammo is reliable and most important, feeds every time - then perhaps spending top dollar is not really mandated. As for 185 vs 230 - I really am very imbivalent on that. As long as POI is not too radically altered I do not mind - and if carrying 220 will load that with 185 Gold Dots ... they shoot well for me and I do like the bullet performance.
__________________
Chris - P95
NRA Certified Instructor & NRA Life Member.

"To own a gun and assume that you are armed
is like owning a piano and assuming that you are a musician!."


If a BG dies as the result of pointing a gun at me, then he has merely succumbed to an occupational hazard of being a thug
P95Carry is offline  
Old February 21st, 2006, 06:03 PM   #4
VIP Member
 
Euclidean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,213
Euclidean
If I want to shoot a 180something grain bullet I'll do it out of a .40 S&W chamber and likely get more velocity out of it.

The 230 freakin' grain bullet just seems to be the whole point of shooting .45 ACP to me personally, and this is coming from a guy who likes 125 grain .357 loads and 165 grain .40 S&W loads FWIW.
__________________
I am The Armed Educator.
Euclidean is offline  
Old February 21st, 2006, 06:40 PM   #5
Distinguished Member
 
dimmak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: TN
Posts: 1,754
dimmak is a forum contributor
for practice, you'll find the Speer lawman is more expensive, but is exceptionally clean....
__________________
"Ray Nagin is a colossal disappointment" - NRA/ILA Executive Director Chris W. Cox.


"...be water, my friend."
dimmak is offline  
Old February 21st, 2006, 06:52 PM   #6
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Elsewhere
Posts: 17,476
Bud White
I like the 230 grain bullets if i want to shoot lighter ill use a smaller gun 230 grain has a good rep
Bud White is offline  
Old February 21st, 2006, 08:54 PM   #7
Member
 
vzwnnj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 195
vzwnnj
for practice, I sometimes use 185gr, but for carry, its strictly 230gr Federal Hydrashok...dont think Im ever going to be shooting at much past 10-15 yrds while carrying.

I have heard good things about hornady TAP ammo
vzwnnj is offline  
Old February 21st, 2006, 09:18 PM   #8
Member
 
ecbaatz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Edwardsburg, MI
Posts: 158
ecbaatz is a forum contributor
It is what is is designed for

IIRC the 1911 was designed for a 230 gr balll bullet. I feel that is good enough for me to stay with 230 gr. I do carry hollow points for defense, of course they are still 230 gr.

Eric
ecbaatz is offline  
Old February 21st, 2006, 09:26 PM   #9
Member
 
duckhunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Indy
Posts: 262
duckhunter
230 gr Hydra Shoks for carry, 230 gr FMJ reloads for practice, although I have a box of 185 gr Gold Dot bullets to try reloading.
__________________
"Speed is fine, but accuracy is final." - Bill Jordan
duckhunter is offline  
Old February 21st, 2006, 10:13 PM   #10
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 417
Stephen A. Camp
Hello. The original version of the .45 ACP from Mr. Browning used a 200 grain bullet at around 900 ft/sec. At the request of the military, the bullet weight was increased to 230-grains and the velocity lowered a little. That said, I pretty much stay with 230-gr expanding bullets in this caliber but do use 200-gr CSWC's for practice.

There are several "good" expanding bullets in the 230-gr bullet weight and they've performed well for me so I've pretty much stayed with them after years of experimenting with those that are light or medium weight for this caliber.

Best.
Stephen A. Camp is online now  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:29 PM.


bestBest selection of rifle scopes, holsters, belts, pouches, gun accessories, gun cases, dry boxes, flashlights, night vision, binoculars, sunglasses. Information and 1000's of military, law enforcement, tactical gear from OpticsPlanet and Tactical Store w/ FREE UPS! Top brands - 5.11, Bianchi, BlackHawk, Bushnell, EOT ech, Leupold, Pelican, Galco, Fobus, Safariland, Steiner, StreamLight, SureFire, Nikon, Trijicon, UnderArmour, Uncle Mike's, Wiley X,

Hosted ByTranquil Hosting

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright DefensiveCarry.com © 2004-2008