|
|
|||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
| Forum Donations | DefensiveCarry Store | DefensiveCarry Gallery | USGO Gallery | Related Links | Forum Help & Extras |
| Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics Discussion of defensive and concealed carry ammunition, ballisitics and reloading. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: SE Virginia
Posts: 739
![]() |
Powder Differences
I went to the range today and about 150 rounds of 9mm through my Kahr P9. I used 75 rounds of sub-sonic ammo from Georgia Arms and 75 rounds of Blazer Brass. Accuracy was pretty much the same and recoil was fairly comperable. The one thing that was totally different was what happened after I pulled the trigger. The Georgia Arms ammo was pretty much flashless, just smokey as heck. Looked like one of those Civil War skirmishes you see on TV. The Blazer Brass on the other hand was pretty much smokeless, however there was a 8 inch diameter fireball just outside the barrel after every round. What causes this? Different kinds of gunpowder?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
VIP Member
![]() Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Kansas
Posts: 2,212
![]() |
Some powders have flash suppressant added, usually more expensive powders used in SD ammo. Cheap range ammo is made with cheaper powder. Leave the flash suppressant out and it's cheaper.
All powders have slightly different mixtures of mostly the same basic stuff in them I think. What I mean is that though some are proprietary compounds, their molecular makeup is probably not that much different. But diffrent additives and % amounts of the various compounds can cause more or less smoke/flash. (which particular chemical is responsible is beyond my knowledge on the matter) Cast bullets???? If the Georgia arms ammo used lead bullets, that probably explains the smoke. Bullet lube used with lead bullets tends to create smoke more than powder in my experience. Different bullet lubes smoke more or less than others as well. Also, cast bullets are usually not loaded with as much powder, thus there would be less flash because there would not be a lot of powder burning outside the barrel after the bullet exits. Of course my comments here are overly simplistic, as is my knowledge on the subject, but perhaps it will be enough to help in answering your query. I'm not a chemical engineer or physicist. Just a guy who shoots guns and loads some ammo for fun.
__________________
When you've got 'em by the balls, their hearts & minds will follow. Semper Fi. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Moderator
![]() Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 7,609
![]() |
It could be as simple as two different burning rates of the powders used.
One may have used a faster burning powder which resulted in less flash. The other may have used a slower burning powder that wasn't completely burned in the short barrel which does result in a fireball when the powder hits the atmosphere.
__________________
AR. CHL Instr. To compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical. Thomas Jefferson |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Distinguished Member
![]() Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: The western edge of The Confederacy
Posts: 1,223
![]() |
What they both said.
__________________
"First gallant South Carolina nobly made the stand." ![]() Edge of Darkness |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: SE Virginia
Posts: 739
![]() |
sgtD you are 100% correct...they were lead cast bullets. Thanks for the sharp insights.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|