|
|
|||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
| Forum Donations | DefensiveCarry Store | DefensiveCarry Gallery | USGO Gallery | Related Links | Forum Help & Extras |
| Defensive Carry Guns This is the place to discuss what you carry, how and why or ask advice. Feel free to post pictures of your carry rigs. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
![]() Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: South Florida
Posts: 4
![]() |
Please help a Newbie
Hello everybody,
I am trying to buy my first carry weapon. I have done alot of research and in store gun fondling. I think as far as feel goes I have narrowed it down to Kahr p-9, Taurus 709 Slim and Kel-Tec p-11. As you can see, they are all physically about the same size. Any advice would be great as well as any other suggestions on other guns that are about this size. Thanks for the help. David |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 264
![]() |
Is there a range near you that rents guns? Or maybe a friend that has one?
If you get lucky, there might be a member here that lives near you and wouldn't mind meeting up at the range. So you like single stack guns? DAO? Oh, and WELCOME!
__________________
Bersa Thunder .380 cc Springfield XD 9mm sc |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
VIP Member
![]() Join Date: May 2006
Location: Southwest
Posts: 2,282
![]() |
Kahr P9
I tend to trust the Kahr brand over Taurus and Keltec, so I'd go with the Kahr P9. For belt carry I'd also consider the all steel Kahr K9, which is the same size but weighs more. The K9 weighs about 26 ounces, which is still pretty light for a belt carried gun.
__________________
Firearms are second only to the Constitution in importance; they are the Peoples' Liberty's Teeth." - George Washington |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
New Member
![]() Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: South Florida
Posts: 4
![]() |
Blue, yes I think I like single stack due to the fact that it helps make the handle thinner. DAO is fine with me. I have shot a Glock and a S & W M & P. I know the pull is longer and heavier but that is ok. By the way, feel free to correct me on any of this if I am incorrect.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Distinguished Member
![]() Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Missouri
Posts: 1,210
![]() |
I too would go with the Kahr over the Taurus or Keltec. I have the P9 and it's a wonderful firearm.
Here's a great bit of advise to a newbie; don't buy into the internet rhetoric about one guns quality over another. You can learn a lot from looking at internet info on any given gun but you have to be careful, very careful that you're getting unbiased advise. Also, remember people are much more likely to post favorably about a gun right after they get it and just spent their money. If later they're less than happy about it they don't necessarily post. It's also true that people are more likely to post if they get a lemon and the more numbers of a gun are sold the more likely you are to hear about a negative. Truth is, no matter what gun you buy, you can get one with a problem. If you do, most primary gun makers are pretty good and fixing it. You'll hear a lot about the polymer Kahr's having problems. Funny thing is I saw an on-line poll and Kahrs were only slightly behind Sigs and Glocks as far as reliability goes. My P9 has never had a problem. I do think the Kahr guns are better make than the other two you're mentioning. I also own a K9. The K9 is the same gun as the P9 but in all stainless. For IWB carry on the belt I'd take the K9 any day of the week becasue there's a big difference in felt recoil between the two. The P9 isn't bad but it does have a bit of muzzle flip. I believe the recoil of the P9 will be better than the other two your mentioning. If you're a big guy and don't think the recoil is a big deal the P9 is a joy to carry becasue of the light weight but if I could only have one, I'd definitely go with the K9. It's way more fun to shoot and you can do more things with stainless than you can with a polymer frame. You can also buy wood grips for the K9 if you ever choose to. another bit of advise, consider getting the gun with factory night sights. It's good to have them on a CCW gun and it's a whole lot cheaper and less of a hassle to buy'em that way. Welcome and be safe!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: May 2009
Location: Northern California
Posts: 1,124
![]() |
You owe it to yourself to look at the Springfield XD9 Sub-compact.
I have heard bad reports on any of the "K' guns (Kahr, Kel-tec). Best piece of advise I can think of is to find to range that rents guns and try before you buy.
__________________
God is love (1 John 4:8) |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Southern Colorado
Posts: 118
![]() |
Kind of pricey ($599-$649), but take a look at the Walther PPS in either 9mm or .40 S&W. Single stack and DA with trigger safety.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
VIP Member
![]() Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 2,306
![]() |
Of those three..the Kahr P9 gets my vote. It is the most natual feeling handgun I have ever felt in my hand. Single stack and light to boot. The suggestion of a K9 is also a good one.
__________________
Friends don't let friends be MALL NINJAS. ![]() ![]() "May God have mercy on my enemies...because I won't." -Gen. George S. Patton. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Texarkana, Arkansas
Posts: 213
![]() |
I trust my life to a Kahr CW9...not a single issue (Other than a factory mag that wouldn't drop free that Kahr promptly replaced) I have had a XD9 SC but only have a Kahr now...alot easier to hide and very accurate...Robbie
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
New Member
![]() Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: South Florida
Posts: 4
![]() |
Thanks everybody. There is alot of really good advice for me to take in. I am going to the gun show next saturday and between all your advice and what I actually get to feel and touch I will hopefully come away with something.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|