??? Gary VS. Milt ???

customtle · June 15th, 2007, 11:45 AM

I have been Eyeing the Milt Sparks VMII and also eyeing Garys Max Con V they look alot alike but is there any difference between the two ???? Looking at then for both a F.S. 1911 and a 229 which would hold these weapons best

Bowie · June 15th, 2007, 11:52 AM

The VMII is great!!!!! I have one for each of my guns. Looks like the main difference is that the VMII has the re-enforced mouth for one handed reholstering and the other doesn't. For my preference I wanted the mouth re-enforcement. If you want it thinner in the waistband go with the Brommeland. I have never used the Brommeland holsters but they look great and recieve alot of praise. Milt sparks also has the watch six which is like the VMII but without the re-enforced mouth. Good luck!

JD · June 15th, 2007, 12:06 PM

I've got to agree with Bowie, the reinforced mouth is the main difference, the MAX CON V also sits lower in the waist band, the VM II rides a little higher for the reinforced mouth to clear the wasit band.

I have two VM IIs that I like a whole lot, one for a 5" 1911, and one for my Sig 220.

If I was going for more concealment I would go with the MC V.

Eventually I will get one, (MC V) for a smaller gun for deeper concealment.

Some will argure that with a full size auto you will want as much concealment you can get, but I haven't had a problem with the VMII as of yet.

Bud White · June 15th, 2007, 01:01 PM

MCV for me more comfortable than a MS

Ping Ping · June 15th, 2007, 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bud White

MCV for me more comfortable than a MS

+1

The wait is punitive, but youre gonna have the holster for a LONG time.

semperfi.45 · June 15th, 2007, 01:50 PM

I think the reinforced mouth adds a considerable amount of thickness on my VM2.

If I get a different holster it would be without.

Juggernaut · June 15th, 2007, 02:09 PM

You might want to look at the Sparks HR-LTD for your 1911. I called to order one, but it turns out they are only making them for slimline pistols, like 1911s and HiPowers and such, so I ordered two VMIIs for my Berettas.

LeatherNeck1 · June 15th, 2007, 02:54 PM

I have a Watch 6 that I carry my Kimber Ultra Carry II in, and I also have a VM2 that I carry a Dan Wesson 10mm CBOB in.

I cannot tell any difference in thickness of either holster while I am wearing them. Both provide great comfort and concealement under a T-Shirt.

That being said, I'm also on Gary's waiting list for a MCV.

Rolex Dr. · June 15th, 2007, 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ping Ping

+1

The wait is punitive, but youre gonna have the holster for a LONG time.

agreed i have a several MCV and 1 MS im not a fan of the renforced mouth too bulky for my likes

jd

Thumper · June 15th, 2007, 03:21 PM

I have several VM-2's and they're really great but I also have one of Mark's holsters on order... the Incognito. From what I can see I think it's going to be my new favorite! I'll post a comparison in the fall when I get it!

June 15th, 2007, 11:45 AM	#1
customtle New Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Indiana Posts: 68	??? Gary VS. Milt ??? I have been Eyeing the Milt Sparks VMII and also eyeing Garys Max Con V they look alot alike but is there any difference between the two ???? Looking at then for both a F.S. 1911 and a 229 which would hold these weapons best

June 15th, 2007, 12:06 PM	#3
JD Senior Moderator Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Central Iowa Posts: 11,654	I've got to agree with Bowie, the reinforced mouth is the main difference, the MAX CON V also sits lower in the waist band, the VM II rides a little higher for the reinforced mouth to clear the wasit band. I have two VM IIs that I like a whole lot, one for a 5" 1911, and one for my Sig 220. If I was going for more concealment I would go with the MC V. Eventually I will get one, (MC V) for a smaller gun for deeper concealment. Some will argure that with a full size auto you will want as much concealment you can get, but I haven't had a problem with the VMII as of yet. __________________ Some Things Need to be Addressed... Iowa Carry.ORG: Promoting Weapons Carry Reform in Iowa Forum Customs & Courtesies

June 15th, 2007, 01:50 PM	#6
semperfi.45 VIP Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Over here now! Posts: 3,343	I think the reinforced mouth adds a considerable amount of thickness on my VM2. If I get a different holster it would be without. __________________ My art is different from yours; it consists not in defeating others, but in not being defeated.

June 15th, 2007, 02:09 PM	#7
Juggernaut Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Virginia, USA Posts: 570	You might want to look at the Sparks HR-LTD for your 1911. I called to order one, but it turns out they are only making them for slimline pistols, like 1911s and HiPowers and such, so I ordered two VMIIs for my Berettas. __________________ Vis consili expers mole ruit sua. -Horace

June 15th, 2007, 03:21 PM	#10
Thumper VIP Member Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Nevada Posts: 5,597	I have several VM-2's and they're really great but I also have one of Mark's holsters on order... the Incognito. From what I can see I think it's going to be my new favorite! I'll post a comparison in the fall when I get it! __________________ USMC 1968-1971 ALWAYS carry! - NEVER tell! *"Don't go to stupid places, with stupid people, and do stupid things!"*

June 15th, 2007, 11:52 AM	#2
Bowie Member Join Date: May 2007 Location: Jacksonville, Fl Posts: 452	The VMII is great!!!!! I have one for each of my guns. Looks like the main difference is that the VMII has the re-enforced mouth for one handed reholstering and the other doesn't. For my preference I wanted the mouth re-enforcement. If you want it thinner in the waistband go with the Brommeland. I have never used the Brommeland holsters but they look great and recieve alot of praise. Milt sparks also has the watch six which is like the VMII but without the re-enforced mouth. Good luck!

June 15th, 2007, 01:01 PM	#4
Bud White VIP Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Gone from Here Posts: 17,375	MCV for me more comfortable than a MS

June 15th, 2007, 02:54 PM	#8
LeatherNeck1 Member Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Chicago Posts: 75	I have a Watch 6 that I carry my Kimber Ultra Carry II in, and I also have a VM2 that I carry a Dan Wesson 10mm CBOB in. I cannot tell any difference in thickness of either holster while I am wearing them. Both provide great comfort and concealement under a T-Shirt. That being said, I'm also on Gary's waiting list for a MCV.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode