Go Back   DefensiveCarry Concealed Carry Forum > Defensive Carry Discussions > Defensive Carry Holsters & Carry Options
Register Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read
Forum Donations DefensiveCarry Store DefensiveCarry Gallery USGO Gallery Related Links Forum Help & Extras

Defensive Carry Holsters & Carry Options There are some really good defensive carry holster designs, as well as some very bad ones on the market today. Whether you are in the market for a new holster or just discovered another perfect carry option, let us know about it here.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old June 4th, 2009, 09:15 AM   #1
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: West Michigan
Posts: 379
chains1240
My flawed logic on Wilderness gun belt?

When I ordered my Original Instructor Belt from Wilderness Tactical I needed to decide between the 1.5 and 1.75" belt width. My old leather belt from leatherer in Wyoming was 1.5 but the belt slots in my magazine pouch and OWB holster are 1.75". So I bought the 1.75" wide belt. It sounded perfectly logical to me and the belt fits through the loops of all of my pants, the buckle is a bit larger than my old one. I have contacted Supertuck on the holster I am awaiting the arrival of and they have told me that the standard steel clips on their holsters will fit, "Yes, just barely". Was my logic flawed in getting the larger width belt? Should I have just gotten the 1.5" or should it not be a problem? I would hate for it to be a problem since it was an investment in a product that is going to last for many years.
chains1240 is offline  
Old June 4th, 2009, 11:02 AM   #2
Distinguished Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,694
JerryM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chains1240 View Post
When I ordered my Original Instructor Belt from Wilderness Tactical I needed to decide between the 1.5 and 1.75" belt width. My old leather belt from leatherer in Wyoming was 1.5 but the belt slots in my magazine pouch and OWB holster are 1.75". So I bought the 1.75" wide belt. It sounded perfectly logical to me and the belt fits through the loops of all of my pants, the buckle is a bit larger than my old one. I have contacted Supertuck on the holster I am awaiting the arrival of and they have told me that the standard steel clips on their holsters will fit, "Yes, just barely". Was my logic flawed in getting the larger width belt? Should I have just gotten the 1.5" or should it not be a problem? I would hate for it to be a problem since it was an investment in a product that is going to last for many years.
I think that some of the best holster makers do not make their products for belts wider than 1.5." My pants will not accept a 1.75" belt.

However, if what you want is made in 1.75" then fine.

Regards,
Jerry
JerryM is offline  
Old June 4th, 2009, 11:15 AM   #3
Distinguished Member
 
wmhawth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Western Colorado
Posts: 1,706
wmhawth
1.5" belts have always worked for me. I don't see the need for the 1.75" and I'm certain it wouldn't work with some of my belt loops and most of my holsters. Sorry but I think your logic is indeed flawed.
__________________
William
wmhawth is offline  
Old June 4th, 2009, 11:28 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
Jackle1886's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Kendall, MI
Posts: 709
Jackle1886
I have teh frequent flyer belt in 1 3/4. I daily carry a Crossbread Supertuck with it, and it works just fine. The plastic snaps go over and clip just perfectly. You'll be just fine.
__________________
Better to die on your feet, than to live on your knees.
Jackle1886 is offline  
Old June 4th, 2009, 11:40 AM   #5
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: West Michigan
Posts: 379
chains1240
Well, as long as it works with my current magazine pouch, which it does, and my soon to arrive Supertuck, which it is supposed to, I guess I am good to go. Flawed logic and all. I tried to find the return policy to see if I had the option to exchange it but the only thing I could find is that there is no return on belts under or over a certain size.
chains1240 is offline  
Old June 4th, 2009, 12:16 PM   #6
Member
 
unloved's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Southeastern Pennsylvania
Posts: 246
unloved
Quote:
Originally Posted by chains1240 View Post
Well, as long as it works with my current magazine pouch, which it does, and my soon to arrive Supertuck, which it is supposed to, I guess I am good to go. Flawed logic and all. I tried to find the return policy to see if I had the option to exchange it but the only thing I could find is that there is no return on belts under or over a certain size.
I don't see any flaws in your logic. If your holster and mag pouch have a 1.75" loop (or loops or slots or clip or whatever) you should use a 1.75" belt. It will prevent up-and-down movement when you draw and holster. It will also prevent movement along the belt line. You want that gear to stay put.
Most jeans have 1.75" belt loops. Some even have 2" loops. Your belt should just fit those loops. If it's too narrow it can move in the loops.
Your entire carry setup (pants, belt, holster, mag pouches) should be chosen to be as stable as possible.
unloved is offline  
Old June 4th, 2009, 12:22 PM   #7
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: West Michigan
Posts: 379
chains1240
Quote:
Originally Posted by unloved View Post
I don't see any flaws in your logic. If your holster and mag pouch have a 1.75" loop (or loops or slots or clip or whatever) you should use a 1.75" belt. It will prevent up-and-down movement when you draw and holster. It will also prevent movement along the belt line. You want that gear to stay put.
Most jeans have 1.75" belt loops. Some even have 2" loops. Your belt should just fit those loops. If it's too narrow it can move in the loops.
Your entire carry setup (pants, belt, holster, mag pouches) should be chosen to be as stable as possible.
That was the other part of my logic. That if the slots are the same size as the belt the mag pouch or holster has less of a chance to tilt or move up and down. I know that the belt will more than likely lock the accessories to my body but it seemed right to me at the time. I cannot remember where I just read this but a site wrote that matching the slot size to your belt size created friction and wears out guns belts quicker. How much quicker I do not know, 10 years of use instead of 12? BTW thank you for the insight.

Last edited by chains1240; June 4th, 2009 at 12:24 PM.. Reason: edited for content
chains1240 is offline  
Old June 4th, 2009, 12:47 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Pure Kustom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Mesa,Az
Posts: 590
Pure Kustom is a forum contributor
I use a 1.50 Instructor with a D.E.XIX and it works great. 1.5 belts are the standard.
__________________
"To save our country, Slap a liberal. To save it faster, Slap them again!!!!"


www.purekustomholsters.com
www.pkiholsters.com
Pure Kustom is online now  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:09 AM.


bestBest selection of rifle scopes, holsters, belts, pouches, gun accessories, gun cases, dry boxes, flashlights, night vision, binoculars, sunglasses. Information and 1000's of military, law enforcement, tactical gear from OpticsPlanet and Tactical Store w/ FREE UPS! Top brands - 5.11, Bianchi, BlackHawk, Bushnell, EOT ech, Leupold, Pelican, Galco, Fobus, Safariland, Steiner, StreamLight, SureFire, Nikon, Trijicon, UnderArmour, Uncle Mike's, Wiley X,


CopsPlus Police Equipment
Police Equipment at CopsPlus.com

Hosted ByTranquil Hosting

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright DefensiveCarry.com © 2004-2009