Real life stun gun tests - Page 2

Paco · January 6th, 2009, 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ram Rod

I really don't know why I even bothered to watch some of that.

Sometimes the curiosity of watching natural selection at works gets the better of ya'.

BradyM77 · January 6th, 2009, 02:00 PM

Somebody please tell me that repeated "stunnings" will render the person sterile before he further contaminates the gene pool

Dal1Celt · January 6th, 2009, 04:12 PM

Always fun to watch the Youth of our Nation hard a work proving that they can run things after we are gone.

ErikGr7 · January 6th, 2009, 08:12 PM

I thought it was pretty stupid as well.

I was curious because stun guns are always listed as a great
non-lethal device. I have no faith in it stopping anyone during
an attack. I do think a Tazer has more potential or Pepperspray.

January 6th, 2009, 02:00 PM	#12
BradyM77 Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Kentucky Posts: 635	Somebody please tell me that repeated "stunnings" will render the person sterile before he further contaminates the gene pool __________________ Having a gun and saying you're armed is like having a guitar and saying you're a musician. Jeff Cooper

January 6th, 2009, 04:12 PM	#13
Dal1Celt VIP Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Clarksville, TN Posts: 2,570	Always fun to watch the Youth of our Nation hard a work proving that they can run things after we are gone. __________________ What? Me worry?

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

January 6th, 2009, 08:12 PM	#14
ErikGr7 Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Atlanta Posts: 1,028	I thought it was pretty stupid as well. I was curious because stun guns are always listed as a great non-lethal device. I have no faith in it stopping anyone during an attack. I do think a Tazer has more potential or Pepperspray.