|
|
|||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
| Forum Donations | DefensiveCarry Store | DefensiveCarry Gallery | USGO Gallery | Related Links | Forum Help & Extras |
| Defensive Rifles & Shotgun Discussion This is the place for sniper, assault, military, law enforcement and virtually every type of defensive rifle or shotgun. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Distinguished Member
![]() Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 1,245
![]() |
Seeing the Light on Defensive Rifles
I've read enough books and websites about using a rifle for self-defense that I know the shortcomings of the pistol on an intellectual level. For example Clint Smith's well know quote, "The purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle that you should have never laid down." I've read The Box 'O Truth enough times that, "Pistols are pistols and rifles are rifles" has been drummed into my brain. While I knew all this intellectually, my visit to the range today really made me realize the advantages of a rifle on a visceral level.
About seven or eight years ago (before I started thinking seriously about firearms for self defense) I bought a Norinco NHM-90 (basically an AK chambered in .223), mainly to plink around a bit, and because it was interesting to have. Went out to the desert and shot it a couple of times. I found it could do a hell of a number on a can of tomato soup, but never really did anything serious with it. For the last six years it's been a closet queen. Last year, I started really thinking seriously about firearms as defensive tools. I bought a pistol, got my concealed carry permit, took a class, started going to the range, and read various books and websites dedicated to self defense with firearms. The mention of defensive rifles got me thinking about the AK that was gathering dust in my closet. The NHM-90 dates from the ban era, so it had a really clunky thumbhole stock that I didn't like even when I was using it for plinking. So I got a plastic stock to put on it and replaced the original rear sight with a peep sight from Krebs. I did some dry fire practice with it, and read John Farnams Defensive Shotgun and Rifle book. Today, I finally got around to taking my new gussied up rifle out to the range. My slow-fire targets really aren't that impressive (even for someone shooting an iron-sighted rifle), but what really got me, what really made me realize the advantages of a rifle over a pistol at a gut level that I didn't get from just reading about it, were the results for quick shots from low ready. Shooting from offhand, pressing the trigger as soon as I had a sight picture, I shot about a six inch group at fifteen yards. Some of you with more experience than I might scoff at that performance, but what really made an impression on me was how easy it was. I've fired close to a thousand rounds though my pistol since I bought it, and I still feel like I've got a long way to go until I'm truly confident about using it as a defensive tool. This is effectively my first real range session with a defensive rifle, and I already feel more comfortable with it than I do with my pistol. So, call me a convert to the Church of the Defensive Rifle. Of course, a rifle is never going to replace a pistol as my primary defensive instrument (they're not exactly concealable or easy to carry all the time). However, if I'm in a situation where I've got a choice between them (say, home defense), from now on my choice is definitely going to lean towards a rifle. That said, it's probably not going to be this rifle. First off, while I was at the range I had a slamfire. It only happened once, no idea why it happened. It was while I was chambering a single round from a magazine, so I don't know if it would have gone full auto. I stripped it right afterwords and there didn't seem to be anything wrong (the firing pin wasn't stuck forward, and when I pushed it forward with my finger it sprung right back). I fired another 30 rounds after the slamfire, and there were no repeat incidents, but it still makes me leery. Having a slamfire in a defensive rifle would be really bad. Letting one off when chambering a round would be bad, but even worse would be going full auto after firing a shot in self defense (in any situation, emptying a 40 round mag would be a bit exciting). Even before the slamfire, I'd pretty much decided that this wasn't quite what I wanted in a defensive rifle. While I really like the mechanics and reliability of AK style weapons, their ergonomics really suck. In particular, the safety is really hard to get off in a hurry. It seems like this is pretty important in a defensive rifle. A rifle already takes more time to present than drawing a pistol from a holster, having to fiddle around with the AK's stiff, poorly placed safety doesn't seem like a good idea. Plus, the .223 NHM-90 is a bit of an oddball. Mags for it are really hard to find, and are expensive when they're available. I always have to kind of guess if regular AK parts/accessories are going to fit it properly, etc. Time to start shopping for a new rifle, I guess. ![]() Last edited by Blackeagle; December 20th, 2006 at 08:46 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Distinguished Member
![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 1,890
![]() |
i got the same rifle. picked it up in the late 80's with a truck load of 30 rounds mags. everybody look at me like i was a nut to get a ak in 223. but when it "hits the fan" you can get 223 ammo just about anywhere here in the states. not so with the regular ak ammo. not a bad gun for defense. yes the thumbhole stock is a joke, but all in all a good gun. just keep it clean and it should not give you any more problems. never had a slam fire, so i don't know what to tell you. if you want a second rifle for defense i would get a ruger 10/22. one of the best made, hard to beat a 22lr rifle.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Moderator
![]() Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: MI
Posts: 11,767
![]() |
Long guns are much easier to shoot accurately.
__________________
"In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock." Thomas Jefferson Nemo Me Impune Lacesset Link to my kydex builds:http://rocknloadkydex.blogspot.com/ |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
VIP Member
![]() Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 14,965
![]() |
Reading Here...
and talking with a neighbor (LEO) about when (not if) the SHTF, I have come to realize the value of long guns. I sold all my long guns when I moved to FL in 2000...yep dumb...but I did.
I now have a Stoeger dbl 12 ga (customized for competition), a new BushMaster AR-15 with a E.O. Tech holographic scope, a Ruger 10-22 with a 3-9 scope, and Sunday, I picked up a Marlin 334 (.30-.30) in stainless and also with a fiber optic front site. Do you have any idea how hard it is to sneak all this stuff into the house? Stay armed...stay alive...stay safe! ret ![]()
__________________
"That I cannot do." "Give this to, uh, Clemenza. I want reliable people, people who aren't going to be carried away. After all we're not murderers in spite of what this undertaker thinks." *********************************** NRA Life Member |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Assistant Administrator
![]() Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Off Of The X
Posts: 20,004
![]() |
AK pattern rifle in very available .223 makes great logical sense for a U.S.A. S.H.T.F. rifle.
At least in my book.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Distinguished Member
![]() Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: KY
Posts: 1,444
![]() |
I'm sorry, but I don't see the benefit of a rifle for home defense.
I own a SKS that I have done quite a bit of custom work to. I love to own and shoot it, but I would never think of using it for home defense. As a matter of fact I am going for my shotgun first and the .45 is the backup. My main concern in using a rifle like the SKS for defense is the fact that the rounds just don't stop when they hit walls. It is very plausible to think that you could fire in the home and have the round travel through the walls and into another home. This is the reason why I laugh when I see the guy in the movies jump behind the car door or 55 gallon drum when he is taking fire from an AK47 or the like. You know what I mean. If I have a small army attacking my home then I could see the AK47 be a valid choice, but not for the midnight intruder. Please help me see the light here. What am I missing?
__________________
Don't hit at all if it is honorably possible to avoid hitting; but never hit soft! -- Theodore Roosevelt -- |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Distinguished Member
![]() Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 1,245
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Distinguished Member
![]() Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chesterfield, VA
Posts: 1,948
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
"You can get more with a kind word and a gun than you can with a kind word alone." - Al Capone The second amendment is the reset button of our Constitution. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 341
![]() |
The difference in penetration is that a handgun round (especially a hollow-point) won't go through the BG, and if it does, probably not the wall. Even at medium range inside your house (say a 20' hallway), even a .30-30 round will go through the BG, and through the wall behind him, and still retain enough energy to be lethal.
Yes, if you miss, then just about any round will go through a modern home wall. The safety of a rifle in a defensive situation (read: home invasion, not SHTF), depends largely on where you live. If you live in the country, on the center of 10 acres, and know where your family is in your house, then a rifle is a good choice. If you live in apartment, not so good. A handgun, or shotgun is much more practical (and safe). The right shotgun load will give you good stopping power, the same results of your rifle experience at the range, and a low likelihood of over-penetration. I should say that my home defense guns are all handguns (don't own anything else yet) and that my next gun will a Marlin 336A (unless I get distracted by something shinier!), but it will not be for defense (unless the SHTF - It will be kept loaded). Remember! One of the FOUR KEY RULES is always be aware of your target, and what is behind it. Over-penetration can be the difference between a lawful, defensive shooting, and a tragedy. Sorry about the rant - It just came out that way.
__________________
I can picture in my mind a world without war, a world without hate. And I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it. - Jack Handey SIC VIS PACEM PARA BELLUM. |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,099
![]() |
Quote:
"Although some police departments use the Hornady TAP ("Tactical Application Police") round, which is merely a hotter-loaded V-Max varmint round, the primary motivation for adopting this ammo is preventing over-penetration of both bad guys and of interior walls. It should be noted that many of these concerns are proving unfounded as testing on interior penetration is increasingly showing that 5.56 rounds are less of a overpenetration risk than even the 9mm handgun ammo that many departments deploy in submachineguns for interior raids." http://www.ammo-oracle.com/body.htm
__________________
Blessed be the Lord my rock who trains my hands for war and my fingers for battle. Psalm 144:1 Si vis pacem, para bellum |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|