Go Back   DefensiveCarry Concealed Carry Forum > Related Topics > Defensive Rifles & Shotgun Discussion
Register Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read
Forum Donations DefensiveCarry Store DefensiveCarry Gallery USGO Gallery Related Links Forum Help & Extras

Defensive Rifles & Shotgun Discussion This is the place for sniper, assault, military, law enforcement and virtually every type of defensive rifle or shotgun.

View Poll Results: If you were going into battle woud you rather have the
Reliable AK 111 41.26%
Accurate AR 158 58.74%
Voters: 269. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old February 22nd, 2007, 11:47 PM   #31
Member
 
Tros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Salina, KS
Posts: 353
Tros
Quote:
Originally Posted by Go Glock View Post
If you were going into battle would you rather have the reliable AK or the more accurate AR
I voted AR. Newer ones are quite reliable, plus I am a firm believer of putting distance between myself and the target.
__________________
XD-45 w/Stainless Steel
Red Cross CPR/First Aid/AED Instructor
EX - OC Spray Instructor
EX - Restraint Instructor
Tros is offline  
Old February 23rd, 2007, 12:00 AM   #32
Distinguished Member
 
Doc Holliday's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Georgia
Posts: 1,353
Doc Holliday is a forum contributor
Can I use the AR to shoot the guy with an AK, then take his and carry both?

I chose the AK because mine has never jammed....but a Colt that I had about 8 years ago was finicky when it came to cheap ammo.
__________________
Give Doc the shotgun.
They'll be less apt to get nervous if he's on the street howitzer.

Why, Johnny Ringo, you look like somebody just walked over your grave.

I have two guns, one for each of ya.
Doc Holliday is offline  
Old February 23rd, 2007, 12:12 AM   #33
Member
 
Optimistic Paranoid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 56
Optimistic Paranoid
Quote:
Originally Posted by bones View Post
I'm picking the AR over the AK. Only hits count. I'm not into spraying a lot of bullets indiscriminately all around. Just interested in hitting.
Actually I'd really rather have an M14! And I do, a Springfield Armory M1A Scout Squad with Aimpoint 2X Red Dot Scope.
Don't mean to hijack this thread, but I REALLY need to talk to you about your 2X Aimpoint!

I treated myself to a Springfield SOCOM for Christmas.

I have some experience with forward mounting a Burris Scout Scope on a Mini-14 and it was very positive.

Aimpoint is the only company offering a magnifying Red Dot. It seems to me that a 2X Red Dot forward mounted ala a Scout Scope would, theoretically, give you the best of both worlds - the speed of a red dot for CQB plus the greater long range accuracy of a 2X Scope.

Problem is, I didn't know anyone who has one or who could report on how the theory holds up in the real world. Until now.

So how's it been working out for you?
__________________
Regards
John


Life Member - American Society of Armed Political Malcontents

Question Authority. Hang As Necessary!

In God I Trust. Everybody Else Keep Your Hands Where I Can See Them!
Optimistic Paranoid is offline  
Old February 23rd, 2007, 12:20 AM   #34
Senior Member
 
lowflyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Middle Earth
Posts: 1,162
lowflyer is a forum contributor
AR for me.
__________________
Whatever doesn't kill you postpones the inevitable.
lowflyer is offline  
Old February 23rd, 2007, 02:02 AM   #35
VIP Member
 
SIXTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Here and There
Posts: 10,436
SIXTO is a forum contributor
OPFOR stole my answer and the logic behind it. I do need to add that it seems to me that almost every battle is won by the guys carrying the M-16/AR.
I'll take the AR anyday.
__________________
In a land of sheep, even a toothless wolf is king.

"We don't have to worry about the cost of my federal programs because at my last visit to Long John Silver's I got a map to pirate treasure."

- Obama
SIXTO is offline  
Old February 23rd, 2007, 02:36 AM   #36
Senior Member
 
downrange's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: levittown PA
Posts: 568
downrange is a forum contributor
i chose the AR because my only experiences with the two were m-4's/m-16/AR-15's and confiscated AK-47's and 1 SKS. the 7.62 might be able to shoot through the worst conditions but are crude overall (i hate the cocking lever) and i think that's what makes them work. take care of your 5.56 and you can mow them all down... accurately.
__________________
What's this button do?
downrange is offline  
Old February 23rd, 2007, 02:42 AM   #37
Distinguished Member
 
Dakotaranger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 1,835
Dakotaranger is a forum contributor
Give me a Tavor and a AK if I had to fight. Then I'll take a .45 as a sidearm.
__________________
"[T]he people are not to be disarmed of their weapons.
They are left in full possession of them."

Zacharia Johnson (speech in the Virginia Ratifying Convention,25 June 1778)"The best we can hope for concerning the people at large is that they be properly armed." ~Alexander Hamilton
Dakotaranger is online now  
Old February 23rd, 2007, 10:19 AM   #38
VIP Member
 
SammyIamToday's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 2,081
SammyIamToday is a forum contributor
I'd go with the AK. Most battle distances (personal experience) the accuracy issue wasn't that big of a deal. I'd rather have the rifle that definitely goes bang everytime and leaves a bigger hole.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sixto
I do need to add that it seems to me that almost every battle is won by the guys carrying the M-16/AR.
Hehe, that doesn't have anything to do with training, fire support, or communications though.
__________________
...He suggested that "every American citizen" should own a rifle and train with it on firing ranges "at every courthouse." -Chesty Puller
SammyIamToday is offline  
Old February 23rd, 2007, 11:20 AM   #39
VIP Member
 
SIXTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Here and There
Posts: 10,436
SIXTO is a forum contributor
Quote:
Originally Posted by SammyIamToday View Post
Hehe, that doesn't have anything to do with training, fire support, or communications though.
Perhaps...


I do notice an interesting pattern here though. Most of us who have been in combat would choose the AR's. Those who are speculating choose the AK. I'm not saying thats a bad choice, just interesting.
__________________
In a land of sheep, even a toothless wolf is king.

"We don't have to worry about the cost of my federal programs because at my last visit to Long John Silver's I got a map to pirate treasure."

- Obama
SIXTO is offline  
Old February 23rd, 2007, 11:23 AM   #40
VIP Member
 
OPFOR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Baghdad
Posts: 2,532
OPFOR is a forum contributor
Quote:
Don't mean to hijack this thread, but I REALLY need to talk to you about your 2X Aimpoint!

I treated myself to a Springfield SOCOM for Christmas.

I have some experience with forward mounting a Burris Scout Scope on a Mini-14 and it was very positive.

Aimpoint is the only company offering a magnifying Red Dot. It seems to me that a 2X Red Dot forward mounted ala a Scout Scope would, theoretically, give you the best of both worlds - the speed of a red dot for CQB plus the greater long range accuracy of a 2X Scope.

Problem is, I didn't know anyone who has one or who could report on how the theory holds up in the real world. Until now.

So how's it been working out for you?
Optimistic Paranoid, here are a few other options to think about:

The Trijicon 2.5x ACOG. Not quite as easy to pick up quickly as a true "red dot," but excellent optics - durable, self-illuminating, small, light, good clarity and light gathering for the size, et cetera. A definite contender.

The Leupold Mk 4 CQ/T. This is more of a true "red dot" and gives from 0 to 3x magnification. Lens quality is excellent, as we've come to expect from Leupold. This is bigger and heavier than the 2.5x ACOG, but is more versatile. I did see one break (though it was just a chip out of the rear lens, and the optic was still functional) when the M14 it was attached to fell out of a moving HMMWV. I doubt many other optics would have fared any better, though, and most would have fared much worse.

The new Elcan Specter DR (http://www.elcan.com/ELCAN_Business_.../SpecterDR.php). I haven't used this personnaly, but I have used other Elcan's and found them to be excellent (if heavy) optics. This looks like an amazing system, if you've got the cash for it.

All the normal disclaimers apply, but these are worth a look IMO.
__________________
"It makes no difference what men think of war, said the judge. War endures. As well ask men what they think of stone. War was always here. Before man was, war waited for him. The ultimate trade awaiting its ultimate practitioner. That is the way it was and will be. That way and not some other way."
OPFOR is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:43 AM.


bestBest selection of rifle scopes, holsters, belts, pouches, gun accessories, gun cases, dry boxes, flashlights, night vision, binoculars, sunglasses. Information and 1000's of military, law enforcement, tactical gear from OpticsPlanet and Tactical Store w/ FREE UPS! Top brands - 5.11, Bianchi, BlackHawk, Bushnell, EOT ech, Leupold, Pelican, Galco, Fobus, Safariland, Steiner, StreamLight, SureFire, Nikon, Trijicon, UnderArmour, Uncle Mike's, Wiley X,

Hosted ByTranquil Hosting

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright DefensiveCarry.com © 2004-2008