Go Back   DefensiveCarry Concealed Carry Forum > Related Topics > Defensive Rifles & Shotgun Discussion
Register Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read
Forum Donations DefensiveCarry Store DefensiveCarry Gallery USGO Gallery Related Links Forum Help & Extras

Defensive Rifles & Shotgun Discussion This is the place for sniper, assault, military, law enforcement and virtually every type of defensive rifle or shotgun.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old August 30th, 2005, 04:38 PM   #1
Member
 
DirksterG30's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 431
DirksterG30
Pros/Cons of an AR-15?

I'm looking at getting a semi-auto rifle of some sort, and wanted to hear from you folks - what are the strengths & weaknesses of the AR-15 design? Why do you have one, or why do you not have one?
DirksterG30 is offline  
Old August 30th, 2005, 04:44 PM   #2
Member
 
500Mag's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: West Chester, PA
Posts: 391
500Mag
You can accesorize the crap out of an AR (lights, sights, "gangsta" grips, bi-pod, M203). That's not to mention ease of interchanging complete uppers (bull barrel, different cal.) I got a .22 rimfire upper for small plinking and its cheap ammo. I like the overall design of an AR, plus the reliability and accuracy is sufficient, and lets not forget it's a blast to shoot.
__________________
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the PEOPLE to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
500Mag is online now  
Old August 30th, 2005, 06:13 PM   #3
VIP Member
 
Euclidean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,213
Euclidean
I'm bumping this topic. The main attraction I've always seen are the gadget factor and the fact that if you have military experience, this is probably a good gun for you because it's what you've trained with so much. But I want to see if there's any other pros.

I hope George Hill will link to his excellent article on the cons of the AR family.
__________________
I am The Armed Educator.
Euclidean is offline  
Old August 30th, 2005, 06:26 PM   #4
Assistant Administrator
 
P95Carry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: South West PA
Posts: 25,366
P95Carry is a forum contributor
I have often thought of getting a Bushy but cost has been one disincentive. Beyond that I am not over struck with it, having shot one or two - for some reason they don't float my boat. Just me.

My only 223 platform is Mini-14 - bit of a spray gun as it is in just std trim but - good enough to employ the cal.

For me, in this category (EBR, loosely) I feel better served by having the cheap reliability and capacity of an AK, and the FAL for serious work!
__________________
Chris - P95
NRA Certified Instructor & NRA Life Member.

"To own a gun and assume that you are armed
is like owning a piano and assuming that you are a musician!."


If a BG dies as the result of pointing a gun at me, then he has merely succumbed to an occupational hazard of being a thug
P95Carry is offline  
Old August 30th, 2005, 06:46 PM   #5
Senior Moderator
 
rocky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: MI
Posts: 11,767
rocky is a forum contributor
Pros- light weight, good accuracy, proven combat performance, interchangable multiple acces. options, light recoil impulse, intimidating looking, and plentiful , cheap hi cap mags.


Cons- possible malfunction due to gas system(some problems first hand) , light bullet weight, over penetration thru walls& people, deemed an "assault rifle" by the media, all black and evil looking. Sproing noise during firing may cause ya to laugh and miss. Many configurations to choose from, accesories will empty your wallet if ya get em all. Causes BRD (black rifle disease) according to the surgeon general
rocky is offline  
Old August 30th, 2005, 07:01 PM   #6
Member
 
DirksterG30's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 431
DirksterG30
Euc,

I've read George Hill's thoughts on the AR - he pretty much hates them. For his thoughts on the matter:

http://www.madogre.com/Interviews/Hate_the_AR15.htm
DirksterG30 is offline  
Old August 30th, 2005, 07:09 PM   #7
Senior Moderator
 
rocky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: MI
Posts: 11,767
rocky is a forum contributor
Quote:
Originally Posted by DirksterG30
Euc,

I've read George Hill's thoughts on the AR - he pretty much hates them. For his thoughts on the matter:

http://www.madogre.com/Interviews/Hate_the_AR15.htm

Wow, what an extemly opinionated, not all factual account of AR's. If they were all that bad, I think out troops would have XM8's already. Also hundreds of civilian contractors in Iraq would choose a diffrent weapon.
rocky is offline  
Old August 30th, 2005, 08:15 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
firefighter4884's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Wadesville, IN
Posts: 639
firefighter4884
Dirk...

I'm just getting into firearms...well, just starting my collection.

I can tell you that one of the things I want is at least one AR lower reciever. For that reciever, I want a 16" upper in .22LR, .223, and 6.8mm. I might also add a 9mm upper to that list.

I also want a 20" .223 and a 24" .223 heavyweight. These last two might have seperate lowers so that specific optics can be installed on them.

So, the biggest pro that I see to the gun, with the exception of the fact that it is the issue weapon for the US military is that it's very easy (less then 5 minutes to change upper recievers) and therefore barrel lengths, and other options.

It's also very easy to customize the rifle to do what you want by adding sites, optics, lights, grips, etc.

--Jim
__________________
Firefighter / EMT - Always Ready. Ever Willing.

~Never do anything that you don't want to have to explain to the paramedics...~
firefighter4884 is online now  
Old August 30th, 2005, 08:34 PM   #9
Member
 
500Mag's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: West Chester, PA
Posts: 391
500Mag
My response to the neighsayers that think the platform is garbage. Granted it's not perfect, however, the design has been around since long before me, Vietnam if i'm not mistaken. They've been trying to replace it with something better but haven't figured it out yet....there's a reason for that.

Quick engineering generalization...tight tolerances require super maintance but result in super results. loose tolerances require minimal maintance but often result in less than ideal results.
__________________
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the PEOPLE to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
500Mag is online now  
Old August 30th, 2005, 08:41 PM   #10
VIP Member
 
Euclidean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,213
Euclidean
Tell the truth I've always wanted one and still do, but I put it off because I didn't want it to be my only gun.

Of course now it wouldn't have to be, so there you go. I told myself I would get one before Bush leaves office and I plan to carry through on that threat.
__________________
I am The Armed Educator.
Euclidean is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:39 AM.


bestBest selection of rifle scopes, holsters, belts, pouches, gun accessories, gun cases, dry boxes, flashlights, night vision, binoculars, sunglasses. Information and 1000's of military, law enforcement, tactical gear from OpticsPlanet and Tactical Store w/ FREE UPS! Top brands - 5.11, Bianchi, BlackHawk, Bushnell, EOT ech, Leupold, Pelican, Galco, Fobus, Safariland, Steiner, StreamLight, SureFire, Nikon, Trijicon, UnderArmour, Uncle Mike's, Wiley X,

Hosted ByTranquil Hosting

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright DefensiveCarry.com © 2004-2008