|
|
|||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
| Forum Donations | DefensiveCarry Store | DefensiveCarry Gallery | USGO Gallery | Related Links | Forum Help & Extras |
| Forum News, Feedback, Problems & Comments Tell us what you like, and dislike or problems you are experiencing with the forum here. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 |
|
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: usa-southeast texas
Posts: 810
![]() |
I appreciate your stand on this,Bumper.Politics and religion most often lead to arguments.
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Restricted Member
![]() Join Date: May 2007
Location: Tucson
Posts: 2,737
![]() |
How about,
Obama, with his anti-American, European, elitist leanings has spoken both positively and negatively concerning Second Amendment issues, most recently endorsing the Supreme Court's decision while supporting gun control in his home state. We hope to have the liberally biased media pose specific questions concerning his ambiguous stance but we don't see any such action in the near future since they are fawning over him during his recent world presidential coronation tour. Is that OK? ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
VIP Member
![]() Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,895
![]() |
Bumper, I realize that you will probably never change your policy, and I do my best to stay within the parameters you have set forth with YOUR forum, but...I also respect the membership of this forum more than any other forum I have had the opportunity to participate in.
I think I know where my political leanings lie, but reading the thoughts of the forum members here help to either solidify and refine my thinking on the issues. I understand why you choose to not let this forum become entrenched with political debate, BUT we all learn a lot from each other. It would be great if there was a political oriented forum with the same members and the same rules as we have here, but unfortunately, there is not. The upcoming election, is perhaps one of the most important elections since Lincoln was elected, and it will bring about a 'change' in the way our rights are protected and in the way our rights are exercised. I do wish there was a way to compromise so that the members whose judgment I value would have a way to express their feelings and thoughts so that we could all make a more informed choice. I realize that, as the Forum Owner, you are entitled, and in fact deserve, discretionary rulings on what is allowed and what is not allowed...Anybody who looks at my past postings will infer that I am an absolute believer in property rights and that nothing should trump that. Unfortunately, I find myself as a hypocrite in this particular subject. Bumper, you have accumulated a large, diverse, respectful, and intelligent group of members, and I often find myself wondering what this specific group thinks about certain political issues. With the moderation you guys(admin and moderators and members self-policing themselves) have provided and have instilled as necessary parts of this forum, I think the forum membership could benefit from political discussions that would help refine peoples ideas, and perhaps, change others. With all of that said, I will refrain from starting or posting in purely political threads, as per your wishes, but I do wish there was a way where the members of this forum were able to exchange all ideas and learn from each other.
__________________
There are two sides to every issue: one side is right and the other is wrong, but the middle is always evil. http://miscmusings.townhall.com/ Who is John Galt? |
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Restricted Member
![]() Join Date: May 2007
Location: Tucson
Posts: 2,737
![]() |
Quote:
I think Kerbouchard has eloquently stated what many of us feel. This is a gun related forum and certainly Bumper has every right to prohibit any conversations he does not deem appropriate for whatever reason. I, like every other member, appreciate the hard work that has created this exceptional corner of the internet. I think political discussions, as long as they do not stray into cheerleading (or attacking) specific candidates, are not offensive and could certainly be a positive sharing of ideas. We are, however, guests in Bumper's house and I will defer to any and every decision he makes. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
1943 - 2009
![]() Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Montana
Posts: 10,408
![]() |
Quote:
There is a way. It's called Private Messaging.
__________________
When you’re wounded and left on Afghanistan’s plains, And the women come out to cut up what remains, Just roll to your rifle and blow out your brains, And go to your God like a soldier. Rudyard Kipling Terry
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |||||
|
Administrator
![]() Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 17,246
![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
that happens, divisiveness begins. Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Bumper Administrator DefensiveCarry.com Forum Coimhéad fearg fhear na foighde; Beware the anger of a patient man. |
|||||
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Distinguished Member
![]() Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,519
![]() |
If political discussions coud be assured to remain civil and non confrontational, I suspect that Bumper might be more willing to permit them on the Forum(I may be wrong and am happy to stand corrected), but, as has been stated, discussion of politics and religion will almost always stir strong and, at times, hurt feelings, and thus go down hill pretty fast.
Therefore, I agree with and respect his zero tolerance rule. And, even if I didn't, his house, his rules.
__________________
"It does not do to leave a dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him." J. R. R. Tolkien |
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Distinguished Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,681
![]() |
I've seen on other sites the political and religious bashing...it gets ugly very quickly...with some of the most respected posters. The real issue is this is the internet with all its warts. As such, many many things are taken out of context, not clearly or elequently explained.
...and I really don't think anybody's mind is going to be changed on who they are voting for based on rehashings. Watch the news/read the synopsis'...I think it is a good policy and sincerely respect the leadership in making such a policy. Rick |
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Ex Member
![]() Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Southeast
Posts: 261
![]() |
Long overdue!
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 722
![]() |
i understand 100% with not discussing politics.
other gun forums allow it and it does get a bit heated even though most members have similar views as one another This election coming up weighs heavily on the 2nd amendment and what we hold near and dear to us. the outcome in November can potentially be bad for us on a legislative and judicial front. I will respect B's wishes and only discuss you-know-who if it pertains to the 2a.
__________________
Let's Roll - Todd Beamer MOΛΩN ΛABÉ |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|