Go Back   DefensiveCarry Concealed Carry Forum > Related Topics > General Firearm Discussion
Register Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read
Forum Donations DefensiveCarry Store DefensiveCarry Gallery USGO Gallery Related Links Forum Help & Extras

General Firearm Discussion The place for general firearms and shooting discussions that may not fit well in the forums focusing on concealed carry.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old July 8th, 2007, 04:00 PM   #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1
shovel99
9mm 147 Gr JHP supposedly Unsat?

Hi Folks,
A friend sent me a primer on self defense ammo signed anonymous which came from Chuck Hawks website. It strongly suggested that 147 grain JHP's were a very bad choice of ammo for 9mm.

I have read a great deal about defensive ammo, and currently have and carry Winchester Ranger XT, the civilian legal form of what was Black Talon... both supposed to be very effective rounds... 147 grain. Does this guy know what he is talking about, and why any 147 grain round is bad? Too little velocity to open up? ( F=MA)

Thanks, shovel99.

PS I have about a dozen 9mm and the Kahr PM9 is at the top of my list... and pocket.
shovel99 is offline  
Old July 8th, 2007, 04:11 PM   #2
Distinguished Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 1,245
Blackeagle is a forum contributor
We had a thread a couple of weeks ago that discussed the advantages of lightweight vs heavyweight bullets for self defense. There's not much 9mm specific info there, but you may want to take a look for some general discussion of the effect of bullet weight vs. velocity on terminal performance.
Blackeagle is offline  
Old July 8th, 2007, 04:18 PM   #3
Member
 
frostyeyes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Livonia Mi.
Posts: 203
frostyeyes
Lets see if I can get this link right http://www.frag.110mb.com/ this guy tried several 9MM rounds and wrote up his experience along with some very good pics of several bullets before and after
__________________
Gun Control: What a long strange trip it's been
frostyeyes is offline  
Old July 8th, 2007, 04:31 PM   #4
VIP Member
 
falcon1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 4,434
falcon1 is a forum contributor
I've never tried the 147-grain 9mms, so I'm afraid I cannot add much to that discussion, but welcome to the forum!
falcon1 is offline  
Old July 8th, 2007, 04:45 PM   #5
Member
 
Schwebel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 416
Schwebel
Everyone has their jilted opinions, but from what I've seen the 147gr 9mm is a good self defense round, I carry 147gr HST JHP's. They have good velocity and expansion. That being said, the human body is no water jug. These "tests" sometimes seem a little worthless, they don't take into account bone and different density tissue mass. A bullet may never expand because of where it hit, not because it is a bad round. Again shot placement is more important than anything. A non expanded .22 to the heart is better than a full mushroom .45 through the leg. I've seen probally 50 gunshot wounds in my lifetime and 95% seemed like the bullet didn't expand very much, if any at all. The only ones that seemed "mushroom" were head shots, most likely cause the cranial cavity is probally as close to a water jug as you are going to get. I say buy what seems to shoot well for you, any good quality SD labeled ammo, no matter what the weight or type, should be sufficent for SD.
Schwebel is offline  
Old July 9th, 2007, 01:33 AM   #6
Member
 
floridaguy911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: FLORIDA
Posts: 487
floridaguy911 is a forum contributor
I dont know about 147, but I understand that 9mm platform was designed around a 124gr bullet I believe. Someone will correct me if I'm wrong.
__________________
N.R.A. Member
G.O.A. Member
Unified Sportsmen of Florida Member
floridaguy911 is offline  
Old July 9th, 2007, 02:38 AM   #7
Distinguished Member
 
Doc Holliday's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Georgia
Posts: 1,351
Doc Holliday is a forum contributor
My info maybe screwed but I think the FBI had some difficulties with the early 147 gr loadings. Maybe someone else can clear this up but weren't they trying to shoot the subsonic loads that are better suited for SMG's and getting marginal results out of them? I thought I remembered reading about that sometime ago. I don't personally carry 147gr. in my 9mm. I carry 124 gr. +p.
__________________
Give Doc the shotgun.
They'll be less apt to get nervous if he's on the street howitzer.

Why, Johnny Ringo, you look like somebody just walked over your grave.

I have two guns, one for each of ya.
Doc Holliday is offline  
Old July 9th, 2007, 09:25 AM   #8
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Elsewhere
Posts: 17,476
Bud White
When i carried a 9mm that is one of the rounds i carried was the 147SXT Does it work can't say never shot anyone but worked well for follow up shots on deer
Bud White is offline  
Old July 9th, 2007, 09:56 AM   #9
VIP Member
 
ccw9mm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Oregon USA
Posts: 5,943
ccw9mm is a forum contributor
Back when 147gr 9mm JHP or ball had slower velocities and half the energy as they do now (for some of the hotter loads), the on-street performance was documented as being fair to poor, with some highly-publicized results showing awful/deadly failure to stop.

Given the questions about expansion, I tend to prefer faster bullets, but I do want plenty of weight to get the job done. I carry the DoubleTap 9mm JHP 124gr +P round, which is advertised at 470 ft-lbs @ 1300 fps. Haven't seen verification of the energy number, but many folks have duplicated the velocity via chrono. Simple tests on country hams and a side of beef in the field showed dramatic expansion and very large/ugly tracks and exit wounds. (Didn't take photos those days, sadly.)

If 147gr was available at similar performance levels, I'd probably opt for that. Even so, the DT 9mm JHP 147gr still delivers above 400 ft-lbs muzzle energy. Being a Speer Gold Dot bullet, it probably has as much chance of expanding as anything out there, but the velocity in this size from DT is 'only' 1125 fps. I prefer faster, to help with the expansion.

Carried 147gr JHP Remington Golden Sabers in my Browning BDM for years. It was the best-feeding and -cycling round I could find, though it was a bid down on performance. Was nowhere near DT's level, though.
__________________
Your best weapon is your brain. Don't leave home without it.
Reports: CZ P01 pt1, pt2.
Thoughts: Justifiable self defense.
Reality: Disarming citizens only results in more victims.
Tip: Use the <search> feature.
ccw9mm is online now  
Old July 9th, 2007, 10:05 AM   #10
VIP Member
 
Cupcake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,639
Cupcake is a forum contributor
This study begs to differ that 147gr so't work so good.

http://www.firearmstactical.com/briefs9.htm
__________________
30lbs gone.

[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
www.zerotoathlete.blogspot.com
My journey to fitness.
Cupcake is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:22 PM.


bestBest selection of rifle scopes, holsters, belts, pouches, gun accessories, gun cases, dry boxes, flashlights, night vision, binoculars, sunglasses. Information and 1000's of military, law enforcement, tactical gear from OpticsPlanet and Tactical Store w/ FREE UPS! Top brands - 5.11, Bianchi, BlackHawk, Bushnell, EOT ech, Leupold, Pelican, Galco, Fobus, Safariland, Steiner, StreamLight, SureFire, Nikon, Trijicon, UnderArmour, Uncle Mike's, Wiley X,

Hosted ByTranquil Hosting

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright DefensiveCarry.com © 2004-2008