UN gun free zones - Page 3

d2thomas · January 20th, 2006, 02:35 PM

Honestly, I think the UN's proposition draws back to the age old arguement that by making guns "illegal" or inceasing "gun free zones" - crime will magically "disappear". It's safe to say that around these parts [the forum], we know that evildoer's don't care about the law [obviously] and will attain those weapons anyway. The only group of people it ends up hurting are those who are responsible people and those who are about protecting the common good.

Here is the Cliff Notes version
UN + no guns = bad
people - guns = bad
people + guns = good

mikaldulee · January 20th, 2006, 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ExSoldier762

I remember that thread and it wasn't anti-UN comments that got folks in trouble...at least in the general sense. It was I can't wait to get those little blue helmets in my crosshairs kind of comments that made the thread inappropriate for this board. I agreed then and I agree now, even though then...I let my tinfoil hat activate too and ran my mouth a little bit on those little blue helmets...

I was a member of the John Birch Society for years....

Howdy Exsoldier762, I still have a pm from you during that time.

I missed all that conspriracy stuff, I was sick during that time.:shrug:

Things must have really torqued off Bumper and the mods along with a few others.

When I came back the warning lights were going off and I made the mistake of trying to figure out what the heck happened. Aside from the "gunkid the troll" incidents, I hadn't seen things that really p.o.ed anyone on this site like this seemed to. Guess I got a bit to curious.

I really ticked a couple of folks off and man did it get tense. After that, I became an infrequent visitor.

I tended to visit here because it's was more of a national CCW issues site than the main site I visited(www.missouricarry.com). Plus, there wasn't the troll problem that packing had.

Looks like I can check in here more often now.

mrrangersir · January 20th, 2006, 10:08 PM

I think th UN should move to international territory, namely the Antartic. that way they would not be on anyones territory. They would have to stay inside , maybe they could get some work done , and stay out of our business.

Bryan · January 21st, 2006, 02:15 PM

We should sunset the UN because its original mission to mediate the cold war(In talks at least) is over. We then could make a new organization that focuses on terrorism (the new threat). That would keep its nose out of everyone business unless it was a real threat to global security like nuclear weapons. Oh wait they don't seen to be doing anything about nuclear proliferation maybe that's why they are going after small arms, because they cant do the big job's they're assigned. Also some of those UN delegates are close to being terrorist in their actions anyway (Don't forget most of those deaths are caused by the UN members themselves). BTW anyone who hasn't seen "the Great UN gun debate" should do so and show it to everyone they can.

BigEd63 · January 21st, 2006, 04:04 PM

I agree about UN Free Gun Zones.

Wish I had the pics of a group of friends and I burning a UN flag in front of the Washington Co. court house on this pc I'mposting from.

Miggy · January 21st, 2006, 08:33 PM

I don't know who are these people, but the list has some good ideas and they have an UN flag in flames.
http://www.un-freezone.org/unflaguses.html

BigEd63 · January 21st, 2006, 10:59 PM

Cool site they have. I'm trying to come up with some from our UN flag buring but don't have any handy.

BTW- For photo opps get a cotton one the nylon/rayon ones burn much too quickly.

January 20th, 2006, 02:35 PM	#21
d2thomas Member Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Kalamazoo, Michigan Posts: 275	Honestly, I think the UN's proposition draws back to the age old arguement that by making guns "illegal" or inceasing "gun free zones" - crime will magically "disappear". It's safe to say that around these parts [the forum], we know that evildoer's don't care about the law [obviously] and will attain those weapons anyway. The only group of people it ends up hurting are those who are responsible people and those who are about protecting the common good. Here is the Cliff Notes version UN + no guns = bad people - guns = bad people + guns = good __________________ S&W 5906 ****** si vis pacem, para bellum protego communis bona**

January 21st, 2006, 02:15 PM	#24
Bryan Member Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 334	We should sunset the UN because its original mission to mediate the cold war(In talks at least) is over. We then could make a new organization that focuses on terrorism (the new threat). That would keep its nose out of everyone business unless it was a real threat to global security like nuclear weapons. Oh wait they don't seen to be doing anything about nuclear proliferation maybe that's why they are going after small arms, because they cant do the big job's they're assigned. Also some of those UN delegates are close to being terrorist in their actions anyway (Don't forget most of those deaths are caused by the UN members themselves). BTW anyone who hasn't seen "the Great UN gun debate" should do so and show it to everyone they can. __________________ -Diplomacy: The art of saying nice dogie until you can find a rock. -The truth is a three edged sword. -Your brain is your primary weapon everything else is just a tool. -When the only tool you have is a hammer then everything starts to look like a nail.

January 21st, 2006, 08:33 PM	#26
Miggy Moderator Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Miami-Dade, FL Posts: 4,543	I don't know who are these people, but the list has some good ideas and they have an UN flag in flames. http://www.un-freezone.org/unflaguses.html __________________ You have to make the shot when fire is smoking, people are screaming, dogs are barking, kids are crying and sirens are coming. Randy Cain. GunFreeZone.net

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

January 20th, 2006, 10:08 PM	#23
mrrangersir New Member Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Georgia Posts: 8	I think th UN should move to international territory, namely the Antartic. that way they would not be on anyones territory. They would have to stay inside , maybe they could get some work done , and stay out of our business.

January 21st, 2006, 04:04 PM	#25
BigEd63 Ex Member Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Arkansas Posts: 318	I agree about UN Free Gun Zones. Wish I had the pics of a group of friends and I burning a UN flag in front of the Washington Co. court house on this pc I'mposting from.

January 21st, 2006, 10:59 PM	#27
BigEd63 Ex Member Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Arkansas Posts: 318	Cool site they have. I'm trying to come up with some from our UN flag buring but don't have any handy. BTW- For photo opps get a cotton one the nylon/rayon ones burn much too quickly.