Go Back   DefensiveCarry Concealed Carry Forum > Related Topics > General Firearm Discussion
Register Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read
Forum Donations DefensiveCarry Store DefensiveCarry Gallery USGO Gallery Related Links Forum Help & Extras

General Firearm Discussion The place for general firearms and shooting discussions that may not fit well in the forums focusing on concealed carry.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old April 25th, 2006, 06:35 PM   #21
Senior Member
 
Tom357's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Richmond VA
Posts: 693
Tom357 is a forum contributor
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueLion
Today at work had a friend comes up to me and says that he has a AK-47 that his cousin sold him...I freaked,,first I know he does not have a permit for it...this is not the first pistol he has gotten from him.

Then he lets a l co-worker tell him he's ok since it's probably a semi-auto anyway. I tell ya stupid stuff like this by guys that don't know the legal stuff drives me crazy...
This is not a flame. I do have some questions. Why do you refer to this AK-47 as a pistol? Why do you think/know it requires a permit? I think it may depend on your state. In Virginia, long guns, including semi-auto rifles like the AK-47, are completely legal to own and require no permit. As related, your other co-worker's statements sound reasonable. What legal stuff is it to which you refer?
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueLion
...The last time I fired a anything beyond a hand gun I was in the service, and I don't see the real need for a semi AK clone or anything similar to that in the civilian. This is not to say that people should not havethem, I just don't desire them. Moreover, it is rumored that the guys cousin is into pharmaceuticals..Ya know.
This explanation, while enlightening, does not explain why you directed your co-worker to return a rifle he purchased for himself, a rifle for which you have no need or desire. Why should the fact that you see no need and have no desire for one govern his ownership? We are clearly of different opinions. I, and many others, do see a role for the AK's and AR's in the suburban/urban self-defense arsenal. I am curious about your perspective and would like to know more.
__________________
- Tom
You have the power to donate life.
Tom357 is offline  
Old April 25th, 2006, 07:23 PM   #22
Member
 
H22ate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pa
Posts: 30
H22ate
Quote:
Originally Posted by rocky
Gotta agree with most here. AK's and AR's are not illegal to own. Semi autos abound, and AK or AR's in trained hands make exellent defensive weapons.
If you don't want 1 , thats fine, but don't dismiss em as not needed for others. I want the best chance to defend myself and family in any situation.
I coudnt have said it better myself. I have both an ak and an ar, beside household protection they are fun as hell to go out to a range and shoot. The ammo is fairly cheap and there are hundreds of after-markets for these guns.
__________________
"That one was rubber, The next one is live"
H22ate is offline  
Old April 26th, 2006, 12:52 AM   #23
OD
VIP Member
 
OD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vatican City
Posts: 2,792
OD is a forum contributor
If it's a semi-automatic, it is not an AK-47, just like the current AR15s are not M16s.
__________________
OD
"Slow down, you'll get a more harmonious outcome...."
--------------------------------------------
"The pistol, learn it well, carry it always ..." - Jeff Cooper
OD is offline  
Old April 26th, 2006, 03:09 AM   #24
Distinguished Member
 
KenpoTex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Springfield, Missouri
Posts: 1,819
KenpoTex is a forum contributor
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob72
My fellow man is neither particularly civil or moral, and may, on occassion, need reminding of the limits of his more libertine inclinations.......
I like that! I may borrow that from time to time if you don't mind.
__________________
"There are no substitutes for violence of action and volume of fire..." ~Otto Skorzeny

If you carry in Condition 3, you have two empty chambers. One in the weapon...the other between your ears.

Matt K.
KenpoTex is offline  
Old April 26th, 2006, 11:57 AM   #25
VIP Member
 
Rob72's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: OKC, OK
Posts: 3,108
Rob72
Quote:
Originally Posted by kenpotex
I like that! I may borrow that from time to time if you don't mind.
Thanks! By all means....

I will grant that I agree with BL, in that some "children" should not be allowed to have certain "toys"......but, that is where the issue of personal responsibility comes in. If we remove that responsibility, as a society, then only the "Professionals" will have any arms, as by definition, they are the only ones trained to use them. Not something I care to have. I have certainly seen my fair share of 'tards, "drinkin' beer, 'n playin' wi' my gun......", or scenarios of equally limited capacity, though not necessarily requiring an artificial agent to incapacitate the individuals in question....

Get the kid to the range, and teach him how to use his carbine! Unless this is one of those Krink pistols, in which case, get him to trade it out for a good, stocked, AK/SKS.

I have seen the use and application of both legal and illegal FA. With a cyclic rate of 600-900 rpm, it is not difficult to deliver triples and quads, COM. Not bad and better than a SG, if you are concerned with having BG left at the end of your magazine. In the rates of the illegally altered SA weapon, your odds, on the recieving end, aren't exactly terrible, as long as you have some distance and movement. Monkeying around with slip-sears, light springs, and the like, has caused a fatal stoppage for more than one banger, and on occassion, spectacular OOBs ("Oooohh! mama, Ah cain't see!")
Rob72 is offline  
Old April 27th, 2006, 05:47 PM   #26
Senior Member
 
BlueLion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: It Changes...
Posts: 829
BlueLion
Tom 357, first off in my haste to type yes, yes, it seems that I refered to the rife as a pistol. Good job really reading my post. Secondly, it is my opinion just that and if you like AR's and the sort that is cool no problem here. However, what I won't do is get into mindless debate over your opinion versus mine because opinions are like --- everyone has one.
__________________
Listen, Think and React.....Nuff Said.....
BlueLion is offline  
Old April 28th, 2006, 02:10 AM   #27
Senior Moderator
 
srfl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: FL
Posts: 6,654
srfl is a forum contributor
I used to work as a P/T rangemaster in NJ....so I've seen my fair share of unusual first choices in weapons by the untrained/unitiated to include .44 and .357 caliber Desert Eagles....so hearing about a somewhat immature person purchasing and toting an AK doesn't phase me a bit.

That said, as an LEO and military officer...I can care less if a good guy civilian owns a semi-automatic rifle....I for one don't fear the citizenry with such weapons for a simple reason...I'm a citizen of this country too and my current occupations do not make me better than someone who is not or never was neither a badge or dogtag wearer...I just get to do lots of fun stuff...and some of it with guns.....what I do fear is a criminal carrying any kind of weapon up to and including a Red Ryder BB gun or sharpened stick....and if Mr. (new) AK shooter decides to use that in defense of his life, limb and home...power to him.

However, given his possible dubious source for purchasing the gun, maybe have a LEO friend run the S/N of the AK? Also have him train with it....properly....no "hey watch this" as he does his best impression of a Liberian gunman.
__________________
USAF: Loving Our Obscene Amenities Since 1947
srfl is offline  
Old April 28th, 2006, 01:17 PM   #28
Senior Member
 
Tom357's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Richmond VA
Posts: 693
Tom357 is a forum contributor
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueLion
...However, what I won't do is get into mindless debate over your opinion versus mine because opinions are like --- everyone has one.
Ah, I wondered if, perhaps, it was something like the RRA LAR-15 pistol, only in an AK design. I don't generally engage in mindless debate, nor do I consider your opinion mindless. I was interested in your perspective on why you see no need for a semi-auto version of those designs for the civilian population. Mostly because your opinion is different from mine, and therefore worth considering.
__________________
- Tom
You have the power to donate life.
Tom357 is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:07 AM.


bestBest selection of rifle scopes, holsters, belts, pouches, gun accessories, gun cases, dry boxes, flashlights, night vision, binoculars, sunglasses. Information and 1000's of military, law enforcement, tactical gear from OpticsPlanet and Tactical Store w/ FREE UPS! Top brands - 5.11, Bianchi, BlackHawk, Bushnell, EOT ech, Leupold, Pelican, Galco, Fobus, Safariland, Steiner, StreamLight, SureFire, Nikon, Trijicon, UnderArmour, Uncle Mike's, Wiley X,

Hosted ByTranquil Hosting

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright DefensiveCarry.com © 2004-2008