|
|
|||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
| Forum Donations | DefensiveCarry Store | DefensiveCarry Gallery | USGO Gallery | Related Links | Forum Help & Extras |
| Reloading DefensiveCarry.com accepts no liability for reloading information posted by members. It is down to the individual posting to ensure safe standards and to readers to verify what they read - it is they finally who bear responsibility for useage of information. Remember - typos can occur! We strongly recommend that in most cases quoted loads be derived from recognized loading manuals and if possible these should be referenced. Where loads do not have back-up reference data available, for instance with use of an unusual powder, then posters are asked to please detail their method for establishing their data. Irresponsible publishing of unsubstantiated ''guestimated'' data is deprecated and may be heavily moderated. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 284
![]() |
Question on .40 S&W
Hi Guys,
I figured I would put this to the more experienced members here. Am trying to make my first .40 S&W reloads and coming across something that has me thinking. First off, I am using 180 grain Rainier round nose plated bullets. Powder is HP-38(Win 231), Winchester small primers, 1x brass. Looking at the Hodgdon loading sheet, it states the starting load at 4.1 grains going up to 5.0 max. However the Lyman Manual(48th) says the starting load is 5.0, up to 5.6 for max. My question is which one do I use? To me that is a big difference between 2 different manuals for the same powder. I don't want a kaboom, but I don't want to undercharge either. Which load would you recommend starting out with. Thanks for any advice you guys could give me. SY |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: May 2006
Location: Maine
Posts: 664
![]() |
.... I wonder if either of those loads are specific to the ranier bullets, or if they are for traditional jacketed ammo? Raniers are plated and are softer than swaged jacketed ammo. This will matter to the loading data.
Sorry that I don't load the .40, but I do run raniers in.44 and .45. I tend to load them to the lower side of the scale... Not as slow as lead, just a little shy of ball charges. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 284
![]() |
Shizzle, just for clarification, the 180gr loads in each manual is for JHP, haven't found a listing for FMJ in that weight yet, was using it as a reference. Am curious as to why the variance in the 2 manuals for same type bullet and powder.
SY |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: May 2006
Location: Maine
Posts: 664
![]() |
My point was that *jacketed* data may not be applicable for *plated* bullets.
How much info is listed for those loads ? are they for the exact same bullet ? What primers ? Overall length differences ? What guns ? Barrel length ? How about muzzle velocity between the two manuals ? I guess what I am getting at is there is a lot more to it than putting powder in a case. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 284
![]() |
Shizzlemah, looked at the things you mentioned. I looked at same type bullet, 180gr JHP, same primer, 4in barrel. OAL was Hornady(1.135) vs Lyman(1.115). Only common powder in both manuals was WSF. For WSF powder load was the same, velocites were close, but the stated pressures were way different.
I also chked the Rainier site and they said to use lead data for the plated bullets. The Lyman manual is the only one with more than one sample for lead. Now I am totally confused. SY |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Moderator
![]() Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: MI
Posts: 11,125
![]() |
Suggested loading practice has been to load 10% lower than the chart calls for when loading plated bullets. I would start at the lower powder weight and work up . It's easier to tap a bullet out of the barrel than try to fix a Kb. I have not used 231 powder , but found with the powders I have used I can cut a charge weight in half and still get reliable cycling / function of my gun..
__________________
"In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock." Thomas Jefferson Nemo Me Impune Lacesset Link to my kydex builds:http://rocknloadkydex.blogspot.com/ |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: May 2006
Location: Maine
Posts: 664
![]() |
One more thing is how they sample pressures. CUP versus transducers, etc.
And the "same" bullet loading data should be as specific as a bullet mfg and part number. 0.020" makes a significant difference with the .40!!!! |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 284
![]() |
Rocky, that is what I will do, I will start at the lower loading and go from there. I just wanted to make sure I was reading the different manuals correctly.
Shizzle, the Hodgdon manual didn't state what method they used to measure pressure. And yes I understood that the OAL would make a diff in .40, that's why I was asking, thanks for the responses. ![]() SY |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Fort Richardson,Alaska
Posts: 148
![]() |
I reload my 40 S&W with AA#2 5.7GR to an OAL 1.130, CCI primer w\ Laser Craft 155GR RNSWC(L) "Round Nose Semi Wadcutter (Lead)" I shoot A XD40SC with the 3" Barrel. Shoots good I have had NO problems with this load. I got the load data form the AA web site.
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Wesley Chapel, Florida
Posts: 188
![]() |
Ranier recommends that you use the same loading data for their bullets that you would use with lead bullets.
Only a guess here, but, since they are first cast or swaged and then plated, Ranier bulletes may have a slightly larger diameter than Jacketed and therefore raise pressures. |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|