Go Back   DefensiveCarry Concealed Carry Forum > Concealed Carry Discussion > Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics > Reloading
Register Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read
Forum Donations DefensiveCarry Store DefensiveCarry Gallery USGO Gallery Related Links Forum Help & Extras

Reloading DefensiveCarry.com accepts no liability for reloading information posted by members. It is down to the individual posting to ensure safe standards and to readers to verify what they read - it is they finally who bear responsibility for useage of information. Remember - typos can occur!
We strongly recommend that in most cases quoted loads be derived from recognized loading manuals and if possible these should be referenced. Where loads do not have back-up reference data available, for instance with use of an unusual powder, then posters are asked to please detail their method for establishing their data. Irresponsible publishing of unsubstantiated ''guestimated'' data is deprecated and may be heavily moderated.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old March 9th, 2008, 07:53 PM   #1
Member
 
Arkhangel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 284
Arkhangel
Question on .40 S&W

Hi Guys,

I figured I would put this to the more experienced members here. Am trying to make my first .40 S&W reloads and coming across something that has me thinking.

First off, I am using 180 grain Rainier round nose plated bullets. Powder is HP-38(Win 231), Winchester small primers, 1x brass.

Looking at the Hodgdon loading sheet, it states the starting load at 4.1 grains going up to 5.0 max. However the Lyman Manual(48th) says the starting load is 5.0, up to 5.6 for max.

My question is which one do I use? To me that is a big difference between 2 different manuals for the same powder. I don't want a kaboom, but I don't want to undercharge either.

Which load would you recommend starting out with. Thanks for any advice you guys could give me.

SY
Arkhangel is offline  
Old March 9th, 2008, 08:06 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Shizzlemah's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Maine
Posts: 664
Shizzlemah
.... I wonder if either of those loads are specific to the ranier bullets, or if they are for traditional jacketed ammo? Raniers are plated and are softer than swaged jacketed ammo. This will matter to the loading data.

Sorry that I don't load the .40, but I do run raniers in.44 and .45. I tend to load them to the lower side of the scale... Not as slow as lead, just a little shy of ball charges.
Shizzlemah is offline  
Old March 9th, 2008, 08:16 PM   #3
Member
 
Arkhangel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 284
Arkhangel
Shizzle, just for clarification, the 180gr loads in each manual is for JHP, haven't found a listing for FMJ in that weight yet, was using it as a reference. Am curious as to why the variance in the 2 manuals for same type bullet and powder.

SY
Arkhangel is offline  
Old March 9th, 2008, 08:41 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Shizzlemah's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Maine
Posts: 664
Shizzlemah
My point was that *jacketed* data may not be applicable for *plated* bullets.

How much info is listed for those loads ? are they for the exact same bullet ? What primers ? Overall length differences ? What guns ? Barrel length ?

How about muzzle velocity between the two manuals ?

I guess what I am getting at is there is a lot more to it than putting powder in a case.
Shizzlemah is offline  
Old March 9th, 2008, 09:07 PM   #5
Member
 
Arkhangel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 284
Arkhangel
Shizzlemah, looked at the things you mentioned. I looked at same type bullet, 180gr JHP, same primer, 4in barrel. OAL was Hornady(1.135) vs Lyman(1.115). Only common powder in both manuals was WSF. For WSF powder load was the same, velocites were close, but the stated pressures were way different.

I also chked the Rainier site and they said to use lead data for the plated bullets. The Lyman manual is the only one with more than one sample for lead.

Now I am totally confused.

SY
Arkhangel is offline  
Old March 9th, 2008, 09:48 PM   #6
Senior Moderator
 
rocky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: MI
Posts: 11,125
rocky is a forum contributor
Suggested loading practice has been to load 10% lower than the chart calls for when loading plated bullets. I would start at the lower powder weight and work up . It's easier to tap a bullet out of the barrel than try to fix a Kb. I have not used 231 powder , but found with the powders I have used I can cut a charge weight in half and still get reliable cycling / function of my gun..
__________________
"In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock." Thomas Jefferson


Nemo Me Impune Lacesset

Link to my kydex builds:http://rocknloadkydex.blogspot.com/
rocky is online now  
Old March 9th, 2008, 09:53 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Shizzlemah's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Maine
Posts: 664
Shizzlemah
One more thing is how they sample pressures. CUP versus transducers, etc.

And the "same" bullet loading data should be as specific as a bullet mfg and part number.

0.020" makes a significant difference with the .40!!!!
Shizzlemah is offline  
Old March 9th, 2008, 10:11 PM   #8
Member
 
Arkhangel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 284
Arkhangel
Rocky, that is what I will do, I will start at the lower loading and go from there. I just wanted to make sure I was reading the different manuals correctly.

Shizzle, the Hodgdon manual didn't state what method they used to measure pressure. And yes I understood that the OAL would make a diff in .40, that's why I was asking, thanks for the responses.

SY
Arkhangel is offline  
Old March 10th, 2008, 03:31 AM   #9
Member
 
johnnyrigger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Fort Richardson,Alaska
Posts: 148
johnnyrigger
I reload my 40 S&W with AA#2 5.7GR to an OAL 1.130, CCI primer w\ Laser Craft 155GR RNSWC(L) "Round Nose Semi Wadcutter (Lead)" I shoot A XD40SC with the 3" Barrel. Shoots good I have had NO problems with this load. I got the load data form the AA web site.
johnnyrigger is offline  
Old March 10th, 2008, 07:44 PM   #10
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Wesley Chapel, Florida
Posts: 188
Freedomofchoice
Ranier recommends that you use the same loading data for their bullets that you would use with lead bullets.

Only a guess here, but, since they are first cast or swaged and then plated, Ranier bulletes may have a slightly larger diameter than Jacketed and therefore raise pressures.
Freedomofchoice is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:50 AM.


Hosted ByTranquil Hosting

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright DefensiveCarry.com © 2004-2008