|
|
|||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
| Forum Donations | DefensiveCarry Store | DefensiveCarry Gallery | USGO Gallery | Related Links | Forum Help & Extras |
| Second Amendment Discussion & News We all know people that are "anti-gun". Make your best argument, post statistics, stories, etc that may help state why legal gun ownership is a good thing. Help us all by posting only accurate information. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Assistant Administrator
![]() Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: South West PA
Posts: 25,339
![]() |
Sigh!
From todays NRA-ILA email .........
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The California Assembly will consider Assembly Bill 352 and Assembly Bill 996 at any time. AB 352 expands the definition of "unsafe handguns" to include semi-automatic pistols that are not designed and equipped with an array of microscopic characters which identify the make, model, and serial number of the pistol by imprinting the character on each cartridge case when the firearm is discharged. This legislation could essentially ban all semi-automatic pistols commonly used by California gun owners. Read More: http://www.nraila.org/CurrentLegisla...d.aspx?ID=1596 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ This has about as much usefullness as MD's game wasting $millions on ''Ballistic Fingerprinting''. Be good eh - when you pick up someone else's cases to reload - should confuse the heck outa ''forensics''. Oh my - the attempts at lunacy are incredible. As ever - CONTROL - I mean WTF else can you call it.? ![]()
__________________
Chris - P95 NRA Certified Instructor & NRA Life Member. "To own a gun and assume that you are armed is like owning a piano and assuming that you are a musician!." If a BG dies as the result of pointing a gun at me, then he has merely succumbed to an occupational hazard of being a thug |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,000
![]() |
Would said law apply to those pistols already in private hands? I think that would be ex post facto, but why should they care. It's all unconstitutional.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Former Member
![]() Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 693
![]() |
Just like all of the fun things I do, the government wants into the act.
I like a lot of things. One of my favorite hobbies already leaves a precise and singular DNA profile everytime it is fired. And I used to fire it four or five times per day. Now, it's pretty much on the weekends. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Administrator
![]() Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 12,868
![]() |
What a bunch of retards....
![]()
__________________
Bumper Administrator DefensiveCarry.com Forum Coimhéad fearg fhear na foighde; Beware the anger of a patient man. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 615
![]() |
It just goes to show how the anti-gunners are using a myriad of tactics to whittle away at our constitutional right....they've tried the frontal assault and couldn't win...so they start dissecting the issue into miniscule elements that they'll attack one at a time until they're successful....this way, they'll reach their goal.
![]()
__________________
"Endeavor To Persevere" Chief Dan George |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
VIP Member
![]() Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Southern New Hampshire
Posts: 2,547
![]() |
That's why we call em "GRANOLAS" <fruits and nuts> LOL
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|