Go Back   DefensiveCarry Concealed Carry Forum > Related Topics > Second Amendment Discussion & News
Register Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read
Forum Donations DefensiveCarry Store DefensiveCarry Gallery USGO Gallery Related Links Forum Help & Extras

Second Amendment Discussion & News We all know people that are "anti-gun". Make your best argument, post statistics, stories, etc that may help state why legal gun ownership is a good thing. Help us all by posting only accurate information.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old March 18th, 2008, 03:17 PM   #71
Member
 
imatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 242
imatt
Quote:
Originally Posted by nutz4utwo View Post
there is some Powerful pro-gun quotes in here:

Dillinger (DC's lawyer!)
That quote contradicts their own case, does it not?

(quote didn't quote)
__________________
~Matt
imatt.us

Track HR 1022
imatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 18th, 2008, 03:20 PM   #72
VIP Member
 
ccw9mm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Oregon USA
Posts: 5,445
ccw9mm is a forum contributor
Quote:
Originally Posted by nutz4utwo View Post
Dillinger (DC's lawyer!)
Quote:
It is a universal or near universal rule of criminal law that there is a self-defense exception. It goes without saying. We have no argument whatsoever with the notion that you may load and have a weapon ready when you need to use it for self- defense.
Hm. Since the defense is admitting having no problem with having a loaded weapon, a ready weapon, for use in self-defense, then they should have no problem with having the unconstitutionality of a ban recognized and the D.C. law struck down permanently.
__________________
Your best weapon is your brain. Don't leave home without it.
Reports: CZ P01 pt1, pt2.
Thoughts: Justifiable self defense.
US v Emerson, 2001: The 2A protects the individual RTKBA,
regardless if serving in a militia or military.
ccw9mm is online now   Reply With Quote
Old March 18th, 2008, 03:30 PM   #73
Member
 
nutz4utwo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 318
nutz4utwo
Quote:
Originally Posted by imatt View Post
That quote contradicts their own case, does it not?
I am scratching my own head on that one too...You are allowed to have a gun for when you are actually being attacked, but we can arrest you if you have it and aren't being beaten. I suppose we can arrest you once you are through being beaten as well....?
__________________
DELLINGER in front of Supreme Court, March 18, 2008:
Quote:
Now, you can't register a handgun, you can't carry a handgun, but that's because its both -- its possession is prohibited... You're not allowed to register handguns is the mechanism by which they are prohibited.
nutz4utwo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 18th, 2008, 03:30 PM   #74
Senior Member
 
edr9x23super's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 880
edr9x23super is a forum contributor
I was lucky enough (due to my recent neck injury) to have listened to the opening arguments in their entirety. My sister, who is an attorney is special legal counsel for the Democrat contingent of the ways and means committee was one of a handful of government lawyers allowed to sit in and hear the arguments in person. About 10 minutes after the arguments concluded she sent me a text on her blackberry, and I do quote:

"Congrats, dear brother. I think your side made the better argument today; I guess my husband will be getting his DC license to pack heat after all"

Her husband is a republican lobbyist who represents the NRA........

Talk about a match made in heaven....
__________________
"Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are inevitably ruined". - Patrick Henry
edr9x23super is online now   Reply With Quote
Old March 18th, 2008, 03:45 PM   #75
VIP Member
 
Redneck Repairs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 5,064
Redneck Repairs is a forum contributor
Quote:
"Congrats, dear brother. I think your side made the better argument today; I guess my husband will be getting his DC license to pack heat after all"
far beyond what was argued today .. IMHO no matter what the SCOUS decides on this case DC carry is years and thousands if not millions of dollars ( in legal costs ) away . This case will be a milestone case in deciding if the 2nd addresses an individual right or a collective right to have firearms and nothing really else . Just what firearms , and the meanings of " keep and bear " are subjects that will have to be judicially decided in other arguments . IMHO its likely the SCOUS will decide we have an individual right to " keep and bear arms " in accordance with the wording and intent of the 2nd . However they are not likely to address just with what or how we may excursive that right, leaving that for further court cases .
__________________
Make sure you get full value out of today , Do something worthwhile, because what you do today will cost you one day off the rest of your life .
We only begin to understand folks after we stop and think .

Criminals are looking for victims, not opponents.
Redneck Repairs is online now   Reply With Quote
Old March 18th, 2008, 03:49 PM   #76
Member
 
lacrosse50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 316
lacrosse50
I forgot how much fun it was to listen to SCOTUS, no matter the topic. It's always interesting, and usually a little contentious, which makes it all the more fun!

I'm reading the transcript right now...
__________________
...and though we are not now that strength which in old days moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are; one equal temper of heroic hearts, made weak by time and fate, but strong in will to strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
—Tennyson, Ulysses

RON PAUL - 2008
lacrosse50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 18th, 2008, 03:49 PM   #77
Distinguished Member
 
matiki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: N.W.
Posts: 1,689
matiki is a forum contributor
Quote:
Originally Posted by nutz4utwo View Post
I am scratching my own head on that one too...You are allowed to have a gun for when you are actually being attacked, but we can arrest you if you have it and aren't being beaten. I suppose we can arrest you once you are through being beaten as well....?
No, that's being taken out of context.

He was saying that you could unlock your weapon, or assemble it, and load it, at the time you need self defense. At no point did he argue against himself. He was attempting to persuade the justices into accepting their trigger lock or disassembly requirement as reasonable.
__________________
matiki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 18th, 2008, 03:55 PM   #78
VIP Member
 
ccw9mm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Oregon USA
Posts: 5,445
ccw9mm is a forum contributor
Transcript (PDF) and audio (RM) available here: click.
__________________
Your best weapon is your brain. Don't leave home without it.
Reports: CZ P01 pt1, pt2.
Thoughts: Justifiable self defense.
US v Emerson, 2001: The 2A protects the individual RTKBA,
regardless if serving in a militia or military.
ccw9mm is online now   Reply With Quote
Old March 18th, 2008, 03:55 PM   #79
VIP Member
 
Redneck Repairs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 5,064
Redneck Repairs is a forum contributor
Napalonatano ( sp ) was just on Fox news. In his opinion we won and handily. He came across to me as an advocate for our side tho so take its what its worth .

oral arguements at rtsp://video.c-span.org/archive/sc/sc031808_2amendment.rm 151.5 meg or so , Ill try and zip it up and re upload for folk without download managers that handle the protocol to save it ( assuming the server doesn't crash since it isn't streaming well and i suspect a lot of folk are trying to get it )
__________________
Make sure you get full value out of today , Do something worthwhile, because what you do today will cost you one day off the rest of your life .
We only begin to understand folks after we stop and think .

Criminals are looking for victims, not opponents.

Last edited by JD; March 18th, 2008 at 10:54 PM.
Redneck Repairs is online now   Reply With Quote
Old March 18th, 2008, 04:06 PM   #80
Member
 
nutz4utwo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 318
nutz4utwo
Quote:
Originally Posted by matiki View Post
No, that's being taken out of context.

...He was attempting to persuade the justices into accepting their trigger lock or disassembly requirement as reasonable.
The disassembly and trigger lock questions are important, but also, the question is the issue of obtaining a license to legally posses a handgun in the district. Mr. Heller (and others) was denied a handgun license so he wouldn't even have access to a handgun even for those lawful purposes.

you can't unlock and load a weapon you don't have...
__________________
DELLINGER in front of Supreme Court, March 18, 2008:
Quote:
Now, you can't register a handgun, you can't carry a handgun, but that's because its both -- its possession is prohibited... You're not allowed to register handguns is the mechanism by which they are prohibited.
nutz4utwo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:02 PM.


Hosted ByTranquil Hosting

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright DefensiveCarry.com © 2004-2008