Go Back   DefensiveCarry Concealed Carry Forum > Related Topics > Second Amendment Discussion & News
Register Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read
Forum Donations DefensiveCarry Store DefensiveCarry Gallery USGO Gallery Related Links Forum Help & Extras

Second Amendment Discussion & News We all know people that are "anti-gun". Make your best argument, post statistics, stories, etc that may help state why legal gun ownership is a good thing. Help us all by posting only accurate information.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old April 17th, 2008, 11:16 AM   #1
Distinguished Member
 
Rob99VMI04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: ABOVE is the FOOTPRINT of a common american CHICKEN
Posts: 1,568
Rob99VMI04
VIDEO: Clinton and Obama Debate on Gun control

ABC News

Kinda Scary.......
__________________
To be effective in carrying a gun for self defense requires 3 things a #1 positive- aware-mindset, #2 good training #3 good equipment. Equating this to numbers shows us that if you lack one of these=ZERO times anything is STILL ZERO!-4th grade Math

"When seconds count.....Cops Respond in Minutes"
Rob99VMI04 is offline  
Old April 17th, 2008, 11:35 AM   #2
VIP Member
 
OPFOR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Baghdad
Posts: 2,286
OPFOR is a forum contributor
Blech. Why did you have to post that around lunch time? Totally put me off my food....
__________________
"It makes no difference what men think of war, said the judge. War endures. As well ask men what they think of stone. War was always here. Before man was, war waited for him. The ultimate trade awaiting its ultimate practitioner. That is the way it was and will be. That way and not some other way."
OPFOR is offline  
Old April 17th, 2008, 12:08 PM   #3
Distinguished Member
 
USPnTX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,205
USPnTX is a forum contributor
Good grief! These two are complete tools!!
__________________
"Do not fear those who disagree with you; fear those that do and are too cowardly to admit it" - Napoleon
USPnTX is offline  
Old April 17th, 2008, 12:09 PM   #4
ctr
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 201
ctr is a forum contributor
No surprise from either of them really. Leopards don't change their spots.
ctr is offline  
Old April 17th, 2008, 12:15 PM   #5
Member
 
foreveryoung001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 472
foreveryoung001
Double-talk Double-talk Double-talk
Blah blah blah.....blather blather blather

didn't really hear much after that.
__________________
When the messenger arrives and says 'Don't shoot the messenger,' it's a good idea to be prepared to shoot the messenger, just in case.
foreveryoung001 is offline  
Old April 17th, 2008, 12:39 PM   #6
VIP Member
 
Janq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,575
Janq
That part of the debate was garbage.

Also the specific question asked by the misinformed moderator toward the candidates opinions on 'facts' that simply were not true or even the case of the Heller case. The DC Law and Heller is not toward "sawed off shotguns", "Short barrel rifles", and "machine guns"...all of which are and have long before DC been under the controlled regulation of the FEDERAL govt. (!). Hello!!!McFly!!!
To which Obama states that he is not up to date on the details even as he would have one believe he is toward 'guns' in general even as this case is not exactly minor. Further he doesn't even know enough to respond to Charlie's question with a correction that the case and DC law is _not_ about sawed off shotguns, short barrel rifles, and machine guns.
They both state they "do not have the facts" (Clinton), and Clinton in specific never answered Georges's question about DC.

That whole deal in specific to guns was garbage.

- Janq
__________________
"Killers who are not deterred by laws against murder are not going to be deterred by laws against guns. " - Robert A. Levy
Monday, March 12, 2007 -- Op Ed -- The Washington Post
Janq is offline  
Old April 17th, 2008, 12:48 PM   #7
Distinguished Member
 
Rob99VMI04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: ABOVE is the FOOTPRINT of a common american CHICKEN
Posts: 1,568
Rob99VMI04
Quote:
Originally Posted by Janq View Post
That part of the debate was garbage.

Also the specific question asked by the misinformed moderator toward the candidates opinions on 'facts' that simply were not true or even the case of the Heller case. The DC Law and Heller is not toward "sawed off shotguns", "Short barrel rifles", and "machine guns"...all of which are and have long before DC been under the controlled regulation of the FEDERAL govt. (!). Hello!!!McFly!!!
To which Obama states that he is not up to date on the details even as he would have one believe he is toward 'guns' in general even as this case is not exactly minor. Further he doesn't even know enough to respond to Charlie's question with a correction that the case and DC law is _not_ about sawed off shotguns, short barrel rifles, and machine guns.
They both state they "do not have the facts" (Clinton), and Clinton in specific never answered Georges's question about DC.

That whole deal in specific to guns was garbage.

- Janq
I specifically liked the part where they talked about hunting. They said I've talked to hunters, sport shooters, etc......I would have stopped them right there and said WHOA! Second Amendment states Sports shooting or hunting in which part of the second Amendment?
__________________
To be effective in carrying a gun for self defense requires 3 things a #1 positive- aware-mindset, #2 good training #3 good equipment. Equating this to numbers shows us that if you lack one of these=ZERO times anything is STILL ZERO!-4th grade Math

"When seconds count.....Cops Respond in Minutes"
Rob99VMI04 is offline  
Old April 17th, 2008, 01:08 PM   #8
Member
 
lance22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: MN
Posts: 399
lance22
They both affirmed that they will not hurt hunters or hunting.

If they can pass a law saying that you cannot have a shotgun even in your own house, how does that not affect hunting?

If they say your remington 7400 deer rifle is now an assault rifle, how does that not affect hunting?

If your Ruger Alaskan, which you purchased for taking deer is criminalized by a handgun-ban, how does that not affect hunting?

If ammo prices are taxed to death as a way of punishing the 'gun industry', how does that not affect hunting?

They keep telling the same lie over and over: Their anti-gun legislation will not hurt hunters or hunting ... and for some reason there are a lot of hunters out there who believe it.
lance22 is online now  
Old April 17th, 2008, 01:09 PM   #9
Senior Moderator
 
rstickle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Laurel, MD
Posts: 9,277
rstickle is a forum contributor
Never has so much been spoken, but so little said.

And that seems to happen anytime a politician opens his (her) mouth, no matter which party......
__________________
Rick

EOD - Initial success or total failure
rstickle is offline  
Old April 17th, 2008, 01:29 PM   #10
New Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 12
Lensgrinder
Obama, 4:56 into the clip:
We can make sure that criminals don't have guns in their hands...


WOW!! IS HE JUST THAT GOOD????

That has been proven, in other countries as well as numberous cities in the USA, to be ABSOLUTELY IMPOSSIBLE!

What scares me the most is the number of sheeple that will believe him.
Lensgrinder is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:02 AM.


Hosted ByTranquil Hosting

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright DefensiveCarry.com © 2004-2008