|
|
|||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
| Forum Donations | DefensiveCarry Store | DefensiveCarry Gallery | USGO Gallery | Related Links | Forum Help & Extras |
| Second Amendment Discussion & News We all know people that are "anti-gun". Make your best argument, post statistics, stories, etc that may help state why legal gun ownership is a good thing. Help us all by posting only accurate information. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,099
![]() |
PRESIDENT BUSH SIGNS "PROTECTION OF LAWFUL COMMERCE IN ARMS ACT"
PRESIDENT BUSH SIGNS
"PROTECTION OF LAWFUL COMMERCE IN ARMS ACT" Landmark NRA Victory Now Law On Wednesday, President George W. Bush signed into law the NRA-backed "Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act" (S. 397) to end politically motivated lawsuits designed to bankrupt law-abiding American firearm manufacturers and retailers. S. 397 passed both chambers in Congress with broad bipartisan support. "This is an historic day for freedom. I would like to thank President Bush for signing the most significant piece of pro-gun legislation in twenty years into law. History will show that this law helped save the American firearms industry from collapse under the burden of these ruinous and politically motivated lawsuits," said NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre. In late July, the U.S. Senate approved the measure 65-31. Last week, the U.S. House overwhelmingly passed the bill 283-144. The new law is a monumental victory for NRA and its members. "What we witness today is the culmination of a seven-year effort that included a comprehensive legislative and election strategy," stated NRA-ILA Executive Director Chris W. Cox. "We had to work hard to change the political landscape to allow for passage of this landmark legislation. As always, our members were up to the task. It was key electoral victories in 2000, 2002 and 2004 that helped pave the way for passage of this law. "The Bush administration was a vital ally during debate on Capitol Hill. I would also like to thank Senators Larry Craig (R-Idaho) and Max Baucus (D-Mont.) and Congressmen Rick Boucher (D-Va.) and Cliff Stearns (R-Fla.) for doing a yeoman's job as lead co-sponsors of this legislation. In addition, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.), Senate Majority Whip Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), and Senate Republican Conference Chairman Rick Santorum (R-Penn.) ought to be commended for their steadfast leadership during Senate deliberations," added Cox. In recent years, 33 states have passed similar legislation outlawing reckless lawsuits intended to bankrupt the gun industry. However, this new law creates judicial uniformity in all courts across the United States. "This law will help preserve the American firearms industry and also help preserve American manufacturing jobs. American companies will cease to make products if they continue to be sued every time a violent criminal they do not know, have never met, and cannot control, misuses a legal, non-defective product. This is a significant step toward saving millions of manufacturing jobs," concluded LaPierre.
__________________
Blessed be the Lord my rock who trains my hands for war and my fingers for battle. Psalm 144:1 Si vis pacem, para bellum |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Assistant Administrator
![]() Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: South West PA
Posts: 25,366
![]() |
Not before time tho this should never have had to happen had litigation not gotten so damned stupid these last few years.
As far as I can tell - this is excellent - tho I am trying to peer deep inside and see what might have been left as a loophole. That's the cynic in me of course ![]() Thx for the news item JT.
__________________
Chris - P95 NRA Certified Instructor & NRA Life Member. "To own a gun and assume that you are armed is like owning a piano and assuming that you are a musician!." If a BG dies as the result of pointing a gun at me, then he has merely succumbed to an occupational hazard of being a thug |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Distinguished Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Springfield, Missouri
Posts: 1,771
![]() |
I've been following this one pretty closely, I'm glad it finally passed without any of the "add-on" ammendments that the liberals love to tack on.
Of course like Chris mentioned, that something like this is even necessary reflects poorly on our legal system.
__________________
"There are no substitutes for violence of action and volume of fire..." ~Otto Skorzeny If you carry in Condition 3, you have two empty chambers. One in the weapon...the other between your ears. Matt K.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Luke AFB, AZ
Posts: 706
![]() |
That it is neccesary shows the weakness of our legal system and our society really. That it actually happened shows that we are starting to move in the correct direction. (Or should I say, the "right" direction? -Yes, that pun was intended. Sorry, just couldn't help myself.)
A1C Lickey |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: STL Mo
Posts: 42
![]() |
Now... Lets get the lawyers out of the medical profession, too.
Are there bad docs, sure there are. But the legal profession has been predating on the medical profession too long. BTW. Can anyone out there name ONE THING that the legal profession has added to our society? They are vultures.
__________________
Mongo only pawn .... in game of life. |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Look at my login
Posts: 462
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
Steve December 9, 2005 (CNN) While interviewing an anonymous US Special Forces soldier on his sniper skills, a Reuters News agent asked the soldier what he felt when shooting members of Al Qaeda in Afghanistan. The soldier shrugged and replied, "Recoil." |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|