Go Back   DefensiveCarry Concealed Carry Forum > Related Topics > Second Amendment Discussion & News
Register Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read
Forum Donations DefensiveCarry Store DefensiveCarry Gallery USGO Gallery Related Links Forum Help & Extras

Second Amendment Discussion & News We all know people that are "anti-gun". Make your best argument, post statistics, stories, etc that may help state why legal gun ownership is a good thing. Help us all by posting only accurate information.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old July 5th, 2008, 05:52 PM   #21
Distinguished Member
 
JonInNY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mid-Hudson Valley New York State
Posts: 1,789
JonInNY is a forum contributor
This is not Disney's biggest problem. I think they will start feeling the crunch of losing business from the general public. For example, it would cost a family of four about $2,000 just to fly there, not to mention their exhorbitant admission, lodging, and food prices.

I think if our economy keeps deteriorating like this, most theme parks will start to have major financial problems.

BTW, voted:

Yes 6709 92%
No 554 8%
__________________
  • "The right of voting for representatives is the primary right by which all other rights are protected."
    -- Thomas Paine
____________________________
  • Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? (Who will guard the guards?)
    -- Juvenal
JonInNY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 5th, 2008, 06:21 PM   #22
Distinguished Member
 
goldshellback's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: St. Mayberry, GA
Posts: 1,533
goldshellback
Yea 6762 92%
Nay 555 8%

That's pretty!
goldshellback is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 5th, 2008, 07:25 PM   #23
Member
 
OrlandoDriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Orlando,florida
Posts: 67
OrlandoDriver
A Disney Boycott would hit them where it hurts or better a language they understand Nationwide Gun Owners Disney Boyott.
OrlandoDriver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 5th, 2008, 10:32 PM   #24
Member
 
artemis28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 112
artemis28
Voted. 93% yes
7% no
To add some information about the search of his vehicle, the new law also states that employers may not search employees' vehicles for a weapon. Searches may only be conducted by LEOs and I think even they still need probable cause to do so.
artemis28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 5th, 2008, 10:48 PM   #25
Member
 
InspectorGadget's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: PENSACOLA, FL
Posts: 165
InspectorGadget
I am thinking this may be a great RKBA case for SCOTUS to hear BEAR and incorporate into the 14th.

Of course the ACLU would be there leading the charge to protect the Bill of Rights
__________________
Colt 1911 New Agent, CTLaser

God Made all men, Sam Colt made a 5FT tall woman and a 300lb Gorilla equal.
InspectorGadget is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 6th, 2008, 09:40 AM   #26
Senior Member
 
FN1910's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SC
Posts: 961
FN1910
My understanding is that after the refusal to search he went on to his post and then was suspended a few hours later. Now during those few hours I am sure the rat lawyers were busy researching their position and then came to a decision. It really doesn't say why he was suspended and doesn't say if he was fired. Was he suspended with pay? There is a lot of unknowns in this case as far as the public but I am sure the rat lawyers know the details. It is going to be interesting and unless someone with money steps up this will never make it to trial. Back in about 1776 a group challenged the establishment and suceeded. A few years later in about 1860 another group tried the same thing and failed. When you challenge the law just make sure that if you don't suceed you are willing to pay the price.
FN1910 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old July 6th, 2008, 09:54 AM   #27
VIP Member
 
Kerbouchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,390
Kerbouchard is a forum contributor
Quote:
Originally Posted by dang.45 View Post
He should have let them search, assuming he is trying to challenge Disney's specific claim that he can't have a gun secured in his private vehicle. I presume, as others have, that there is language in his employment contract allowing them to search at their discretion, and that refusal to allow such searches is itself grounds for suspension or dismissal. So now he has been suspended for refusal to grant the search, which he has already either implicitly or explicitly said they have the right to do (by signing whatever forms are required to work there).

To be able to challenge their stance against weapons in employee's private vehicles, he has to be disciplined for having a weapon in his vehicle. I could be wrong, but that is what makes sense to me. He screwed up, and may not get the chance to actually make his challenge. Too bad...
I voted,
Yes 8203 93%
No 575 7%
But I also noted you can vote more than one time, so not much of a poll.

I believe Dang.45 hit the nail right on the head. If he really wanted to challenge this, he should have let them search his vehicle and let them find a very secure safe attached to the frame of his vehicle.

For him to refuse the search is probably grounds for dismissal...you know, we want to keep our parks drug free and all, and if the employees will not let Disney search a vehicle then we just do not know what he may be hiding.

He either got some really bad advice from somebody or he's just an idiot on his own. While this is the right time to be bringing suits into the justice system, it is not the right time to bring weak suits. They need to be prepared. They need to be tailored. They need to be documented, thoroughly. I hope this guy has no grounds to fight his suspension, because from what it sounds like, it's a losing case, and Disney doesn't even have to bring up the word 'gun' to make it stick.
__________________
Money can be lost or stolen, health and strength may fail, but what you have committed to your mind is yours forever.

http://miscmusings.townhall.com/

Who is John Galt?
Kerbouchard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 6th, 2008, 02:16 PM   #28
Senior Member
 
FN1910's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SC
Posts: 961
FN1910
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kerbouchard View Post
I voted,

He either got some really bad advice from somebody or he's just an idiot on his own. While this is the right time to be bringing suits into the justice system, it is not the right time to bring weak suits.
I vote for the latter option of being an idiot on his own and agree with your asessment totally. I may be wrong but I think he has a very weak case the way he has handled it.
FN1910 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old July 7th, 2008, 05:36 PM   #29
Member
 
OrlandoDriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Orlando,florida
Posts: 67
OrlandoDriver
Hes Been Fired!!!
Disney Fires Employee Over Gun At Work - Orlando News Story - WKMG Orlando
OrlandoDriver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 7th, 2008, 06:04 PM   #30
VIP Member
 
Kerbouchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,390
Kerbouchard is a forum contributor
Quote:
Originally Posted by OrlandoDriver View Post
Well, I think we all saw that one coming.
__________________
Money can be lost or stolen, health and strength may fail, but what you have committed to your mind is yours forever.

http://miscmusings.townhall.com/

Who is John Galt?
Kerbouchard is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:49 AM.


Hosted ByTranquil Hosting

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright DefensiveCarry.com © 2004-2008