|
|
|||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
| Forum Donations | DefensiveCarry Store | DefensiveCarry Gallery | USGO Gallery | Related Links | Forum Help & Extras |
| Second Amendment Discussion & News We all know people that are "anti-gun". Make your best argument, post statistics, stories, etc that may help state why legal gun ownership is a good thing. Help us all by posting only accurate information. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Cocoa, Florida
Posts: 9
![]() |
D.C. Officials Weigh Keeping Semiautomatic Pistols Illegal After Blanket Handgun Ban
Here we go again. If it ain't Disney, it's the idiots in DC.
FOXNews.com - D.C. Officials Weigh Keeping Semiautomatic Pistols Illegal After Blanket Handgun Ban is Struck Down - Politics | Republican Party | Democratic Party | Political Spectrum |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Washington
Posts: 559
![]() |
The stupidity of lawmakers never ceases to amaze me
![]()
__________________
EVIL PREVAILS WHEN GOOD MEN FAIL TO ACT. |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Canton, OH
Posts: 559
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
Howard I carry a gun because I can't carry a cop!! EDC Primary: M&P 45fs with Crimson Trace LaserGrip plus a 14-round spare mag in a SmartCarry holster - http://MP-Pistol.com/ EDC BUG: LCP with Crimson Trace LG-431 - http://LCPforum.com/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Distinguished Member
![]() Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Kansas
Posts: 1,505
![]() |
Quote:
![]() Well, I certainly am glad that he cleared that up for us. It's nice to know that we have public servants who are not "arbitrary or capricious" when they act to protect the public. Alas, another a load of poppycock! ![]()
__________________
When you've got 'em by the balls, their hearts & minds will follow. Semper Fi. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: May 2006
Location: Maine
Posts: 720
![]() |
Hmn interesting. Is there anything stopping anyone in DC from buying hicap mags today? Looks like they may be forbidden shortly!
I wonder if they will go with something like the CA/NY/MA mag cap limits on new mags. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 876
![]() |
The important thing in the article is that the NRA is already keeping an eye out for these shenanigans. It is pretty simple: SCOTUS says D.C. can not ban an entire class of weapons commonly used for self-defense and other lawful purposes. Well, it is pretty clear that "semi-automatic handguns" fits that definition just as well as "handguns". If they try to make all semi-autos illegal, they will be back in District of Circuit Court before the ink dries.
I also like how two-faced D.C. is about this. The actual law as written says that semi-autos capable of more than 12 shots are machine guns and machine guns may not be registered. There are plenty of semi-autos out there that can not be made to hold 12+ rounds at once. And yet the PDF flyer on the Metro PD website that is supposed to provide information about gun registration flatly says "semi-automatic handguns may not be registered in D.C." Bunch of lying good-for-nothing . ![]()
__________________
“What is a moderate interpretation of [the Constitution]? Halfway between what it says and [...] what you want it to say?” —Justice Antonin Scalia |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,023
![]() |
The current law in the district effectively bans semi autos with the possible exception of something like a Mauser C-96 with a fixed magazine. I forget if it is 12 shots or more than 12 shots, but anything that can fire automatically or semiautomatically 12 or more times without reloading is a "machine gun" and is prohibited. So if they can find a 13 round magazine somewhere for a 1911, it is a machine gun.
__________________
"And what would you do with your brain if you had one?" - Dorothy |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
VIP Member
![]() Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,528
![]() |
I seriously doubt they will take this to court again. I think the Brady Campaign has beaten them up enough about the decision to take the Heller case to court in the first place.
They will skate as close as they can to the edge, but they will make allowances. Most likely, they will 'compromise' with a California type limitation and will probably use the same 'approved' list as California does. Just my .02.
__________________
Money can be lost or stolen, health and strength may fail, but what you have committed to your mind is yours forever. http://miscmusings.townhall.com/ Who is John Galt? |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: May 2008
Location: Kansas
Posts: 483
![]() |
They'll lose again..... this time, they can file that the DC ban doesn't fulfill the Court's order ...... and may not require waiting forever to go up the courts.
Because the Court did say "normal and commonly used". I have heard, that the Supreme Court already advised them.... NO. They may be stupid enough to go ahead anyway, and then.... they may also win punitive damages against DC for intentionally violating their rights and defying the Court. Some of them don't get ... THEY LOST. However, it's obvious they are sore losers and will go down kicking and screaming about how they know they are "right" ... the whole way. |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Distinguished Member
![]() Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: US
Posts: 1,309
![]() |
Quote:
Nope, I don't think that part of their idiocy will fly if/when it gets challenged in court again (and I'm convinced that it will take another case to get this in front of the court). When it happens, I expect them to get slapped big-time by the DC Circuit. Too bad they can't be held in contempt of court and jailed . . . but that doesn't work against gov'ts. Last edited by LenS; July 8th, 2008 at 10:06 AM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|