United Nations Threat Continues - Page 4

HotGuns · July 29th, 2008, 05:13 AM

The UN is not going to go away.

It will continue to be a part of our lives whether we like it or not.

If not today,then tommorrow.

Tubby45 · July 29th, 2008, 11:11 AM

I never understood the UN. It doesn't do anything. It just holds summits and tells the world their opinion.

762 · July 29th, 2008, 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tubby45

I never understood the UN. It doesn't do anything. It just holds summits and tells the world their opinion.

and trashes America...the host country and its #1 benefactor.

the UN does serve a purpose. w/o it, this world would not be in 1/2 as bad a shape as it is now.

Kerbouchard · July 29th, 2008, 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BAC

That's not 2A-related. Important, yes, but a great way to lock a topic.

-B

If I recall correctly, the 2A starts with something about militias and being necessary to the security of a free state.

The take over of our nation by some external group seems to be very much related to the 2A.

762 · July 29th, 2008, 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kerbouchard

If I recall correctly, the 2A starts with something about militias and being necessary to the security of a free state.

The take over of our nation by some external group seems to be very much related to the 2A.

+1... the citizens took up arms before to save our country...i am sure they can again if the situation calls for it.

HotGuns · July 29th, 2008, 12:12 PM

The UN really only has one goal.

One World Government.

They will do whatever they feel necessary to achieve that goal.

Firearms are not part of the equation. Army's of nations aren't even part of the equation.

Their goal is to have a standing U.N. Army that puts down rebellions,insurrections and uprisings all over the world by people that don't want to play their game.

You can not control people that have firearms.Its that simple.

Does anyone actually think that the recent restrictions of gun ownership in Canada,Australia or Britain in the last decade or so have happened by accident? Or that the constant battle for our right to bear arms will ever go away?

We are but one President away,one Congress away from that ever happening.

762 · July 29th, 2008, 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotGuns

The UN really only has one goal.

One World Government.

They will do whatever they feel necessary to achieve that goal.

Firearms are not part of the equation. Army's of nations aren't even part of the equation.

Their goal is to have a standing U.N. Army that puts down rebellions,insurrections and uprisings all over the world by people that don't want to play their game.

You can not control people that have firearms.Its that simple.

Does anyone actually think that the recent restrictions of gun ownership in Canada,Australia or Britain in the last decade or so have happened by accident? Or that the constant battle for our right to bear arms will ever go away?

We are but one President away,one Congress away from that ever happening.

it's all very new world order...book of revelation to me.

an unarmed citizen is just a subject.

762 · July 29th, 2008, 01:30 PM

Daily Herald - Gun control at UN

Quote:

Gun control at UN Print E-mail
Daily Herald

Another reason we need to do everything in our power to keep any Democrat out of the White House is the risk of what will likely change at the United Nations with leftist support from the U.S.
For example, the UN is again attempting to disarm us right now. They are currently meeting in session to facilitate that very real possibility.

I attended and participated in the first United Nations meeting on the Proliferation of Small Arms and Light Weapons several years ago in New York.

Ambassador John Bolton and his assistant Don McConnell were strong in their stance against any restrictions on limiting the manufacture, sale, and transfer of legal weapons -- threatening even to walk out if these issues were brought up.

Many of the UN member nations and IANSA (a rabid anti-gun NGO) were very angry with the U.S. for standing its ground on this issue; and because of the consensus nature of resolution passage at the UN, fortunately nothing was agreed upon. UN Secretary General Kofi Annan lamented at the end of that conference, "We failed this time, but this is just the beginning."

A Democrat U.S. president might just hand them that victory.

•Jim Green,

Cedar Hills

would our govt. allow a foreign body to override our constitution? Something tells me yes.

BAC · July 29th, 2008, 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kerbouchard

If I recall correctly, the 2A starts with something about militias and being necessary to the security of a free state.

The take over of our nation by some external group seems to be very much related to the 2A.

You find the Global Poverty Act to be a take-over by an external group? That's reaching and you know it. Here's the text itself. S2433 has as much to do with the Second Amendment as NAFTA or the national income tax.

The Second Amendment is not a militia amendment, or a revolution amendment. It's an amendment recognizing the right to keep and bear arms, for whatever reason. Spirit's article mentions guns, but that doesn't make the Global Poverty Act remotely related to guns, least of all to the keeping and bearing of them.

-B

HotGuns · July 29th, 2008, 04:27 PM

Link dont work.

July 29th, 2008, 05:13 AM	#31
HotGuns Moderator Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Arkansas Posts: 4,926	The UN is not going to go away. It will continue to be a part of our lives whether we like it or not. If not today,then tommorrow. __________________ AR. CHL Instr. To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men, their individualism, loyalty to family traditions, national patriotism, and religious dogmas.' Dr. G. Brock Chisolm

July 29th, 2008, 11:11 AM	#32
Tubby45 Distinguished Member Join Date: May 2005 Location: In the reloading room Posts: 1,988	I never understood the UN. It doesn't do anything. It just holds summits and tells the world their opinion. __________________ Freakshow Manufacturing LLC "You can kill it. We can help." 07 FFL/ 02 SOT

July 29th, 2008, 12:12 PM	#36
HotGuns Moderator Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Arkansas Posts: 4,926	The UN really only has one goal. One World Government. They will do whatever they feel necessary to achieve that goal. Firearms are not part of the equation. Army's of nations aren't even part of the equation. Their goal is to have a standing U.N. Army that puts down rebellions,insurrections and uprisings all over the world by people that don't want to play their game. You can not control people that have firearms.Its that simple. Does anyone actually think that the recent restrictions of gun ownership in Canada,Australia or Britain in the last decade or so have happened by accident? Or that the constant battle for our right to bear arms will ever go away? We are but one President away,one Congress away from that ever happening. __________________ AR. CHL Instr. To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men, their individualism, loyalty to family traditions, national patriotism, and religious dogmas.' Dr. G. Brock Chisolm

July 29th, 2008, 04:27 PM	#40
HotGuns Moderator Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Arkansas Posts: 4,926	Link dont work. __________________ AR. CHL Instr. To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men, their individualism, loyalty to family traditions, national patriotism, and religious dogmas.' Dr. G. Brock Chisolm

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode