|
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
| Forum Donations | DefensiveCarry Store | DefensiveCarry Gallery | USGO Gallery | Related Links | Forum Help & Extras |
| Second Amendment Discussion & News We all know people that are "anti-gun". Make your best argument, post statistics, stories, etc that may help state why legal gun ownership is a good thing. Help us all by posting only accurate information. |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
January 27th, 2006, 03:31 PM
|
#11 |
|
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Richmond VA
Posts: 686
 |
One wonders how effective an armed superintendent of schools would be, unless the central offices are being attacked (NEA hit team?). Would a principal's position and responsibilities inhibit him/her from armed response when the situation called for it? Particularly since it requires a vote of the school board, this seems like a largely symbolic act that would delay, not advance, true reform.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
