Go Back   DefensiveCarry Concealed Carry Forum > Related Topics > The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion
Register Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read
Forum Donations DefensiveCarry Store DefensiveCarry Gallery USGO Gallery Related Links Forum Help & Extras

The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion Discussions of the Second Amendment, Federal State and local legislation related to our gun rights.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old October 15th, 2009, 06:12 PM   #1
Member
 
cyberdogg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 52
cyberdogg
Thumbs down (Utah Valley University student newspaper) Concealed weapons pose a threat to campus

How naive can they be? I'm a former student at UVU. I once wrote a letter to the editor complaining about negative imagery of a handgun for sensational graphic in "Police Blotter" section.

Editorial: Concealed weapons pose a threat to campus
cyberdogg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 15th, 2009, 06:14 PM   #2
Member
 
BaserRonin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 275
BaserRonin
Posted below so we don't give this site a lot of unwarranted hits. No reason to make them think it is a popular opinion.

Quote:
Editorial: Concealed weapons pose a threat to campus
By Editorial Board on 05 October 2009
Tags: Concealed Weapons, Guns

The College Republicans are hosting fundraisers Oct. 7-8 in which club members and guests will pay to be guided through the process of gaining a concealed weapons permit. Trainers certified by the NRA will take those who sign up through the entire process, save only licking the stamp and mailing off the papers.

The UVU Review editorial board wishes to question this fundraiser and address what we consider to be some serious issues with its taking place on this campus.
First, any attempt to put more weapons into people’s hands can only make the risk of violent crime worse. Our school is no safer for having 30 more concealed weapons on it at any given time. Precisely the opposite is true.

The more guns, the more opportunity for accidents, for misuse, for intentional crime in our halls and for the unimaginable catastrophes which have unfortunately befallen too many schools in the recent past.

Further, the College Republicans are raising money by putting more guns into this school. Given the problems, are you comfortable with this? We certainly are not.
While we cannot deny the legal right to those who wish to get concealed carry permits, we can question using the resources of the university to do so. There is something perverse in using our own campus’ resources, for which all students pay, to put those same students at risk. Regardless of the legality of concealed carry permits, there is an ethical contradiction here and another venue should have been found.

We must acknowledge that those who will attend this fundraiser are likely to be those who are responsible in the use of firearms, as they are clearly seeking to obtain permits through the appropriate legal means and with the right training. However, we do not feel this diminishes the problems we point out.

Here are some Center for Disease Control statistics on gun deaths from the year 2001:

* Suicide 16,869
* Homicide 11,348
* Accident 802
* Legal Intervention 323
* Undetermined 231
* Total 29,573

Guns, far more than making us safer, make it easier to kill either ourselves or kill others.

We also wish to ask this question: For what reason would someone wish to carry a firearm? Of course, it is only too obvious to respond, “Because it is my right.” That is entirely true, but it is at best a partial answer.

We feel that beyond the simple right to bear arms, there exists a tendency toward mistrust and fear in their use and ownership – the use of firearms to create a sense of safety based not on their capacity to protect, but rather the capacity to cause terror in others. If others are afraid, perhaps they will leave you alone.

This is simply too easy, and does nothing to engage other people in the real forum where safety is created – civil society and community. Provo and Orem are not safe because there are more guns, they are safe because by and large we understand, relate, and communicate with each other better than other places do. Getting to know your neighbors does more than any weapon will ever do to prevent the need for having to brandish a weapon.

Given all of the above, we can only condemn this fundraiser taking place on our campus.
BaserRonin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 15th, 2009, 07:52 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
chrise2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Southern IL
Posts: 606
chrise2004 is a forum contributor
classic b.s. argument i love the stats from the "Center for Disease Control statistics on gun deaths from the year 2001" how about we pull up the ones involving car accidents and then ban cars from campus?

When i was in college I didn't worry about a CHL holder accidentally shooting me... I worried about walking/riding my bike across campus and some idiot hitting me with his car. Some people just don't get it.
__________________
Glock 27,Hi-Point .380, S&W 3913

NRA Member/Supporter

"Government is not the solution to our problems; government is the problem." - President Ronald Reagan
chrise2004 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old October 15th, 2009, 08:21 PM   #4
VIP Member
 
retsupt99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 22,822
retsupt99 is a forum contributor
Simply put...



__________________
"That I cannot do."

"Give this to, uh, Clemenza. I want reliable people, people who aren't going to be carried away. After all we're not murderers in spite of what this undertaker thinks."


***********************************

NRA Life Member
retsupt99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 15th, 2009, 11:27 PM   #5
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 153
torgo1968
Quote:
We feel that beyond the simple right to bear arms, there exists a tendency toward mistrust and fear in their use and ownership – the use of firearms to create a sense of safety based not on their capacity to protect, but rather the capacity to cause terror in others. If others are afraid, perhaps they will leave you alone.
Of all their arguments, this one is the most bizarre. They are seeking concealed permits. Those who carry concealed take great pains to, oh, I don't know, CONCEAL the fact that they have a gun. Causing terror in others doesn't enter the equation. Good lord, what a stupid argument.
torgo1968 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 16th, 2009, 12:00 AM   #6
VIP Member
 
grady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Near St. Louis, Missouri
Posts: 2,329
grady is a forum contributor
Quote:
Originally Posted by torgo1968 View Post
Of all their arguments, this one is the most bizarre. They are seeking concealed permits. Those who carry concealed take great pains to, oh, I don't know, CONCEAL the fact that they have a gun. Causing terror in others doesn't enter the equation. Good lord, what a stupid argument.
Agreed. I was going to quote the exact paragraph.

I don't carry a firearm to cause terror in others so they will leave me alone, I carry to have a chance at surviving an armed attack.

Plus, like you said, torgo, it's usually concealed, so I can't "cause terror in others" unless that person is an active threat to me. In that case, it's reasonable for me to "cause terror" among other things.


And the quotes from 2001...
Suicides: so if no gun was available, those people couldn't have found another way??? Yeh, right.

Homicides: proves the point of concealed carry to me. If those 11,348 murder victims had been armed, there wouldn't have been 11,348 of them.

What a waste of time to try and reason with someone like the author of that piece.
grady is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 16th, 2009, 02:04 AM   #7
Ex Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: This Planet Rocks !
Posts: 160
12Rounds
Incredibly naive.
The only effective communication that a little old lady can have with the monster that plans to rape and kill her is "click, boom" .
12Rounds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 16th, 2009, 06:37 AM   #8
VIP Member
 
PatrioticRick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rigby, Idaho
Posts: 4,691
PatrioticRick is a forum contributor
10 to 1 this person is an Out of Stater and see what happends when you let Out of Staters go to your schools, they write BS. If you don't like how they do it in Utah, don't got there, keep your a$$ in California. JMHO
__________________
Μολὼν λαβέ



USN/USAF Retired/Desert Shield/Desert Storm
DAV Life Member
NRA Life Member
PatrioticRick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 16th, 2009, 07:01 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
Plop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Utah
Posts: 845
Plop
Quote:
Originally Posted by BaserRonin View Post
Posted below so we don't give this site a lot of unwarranted hits. No reason to make them think it is a popular opinion.
Excellent idea, thanks!

Quote:
This is simply too easy, and does nothing to engage other people in the real forum where safety is created – civil society and community. Provo and Orem are not safe because there are more guns, they are safe because by and large we understand, relate, and communicate with each other better than other places do. Getting to know your neighbors does more than any weapon will ever do to prevent the need for having to brandish a weapon.
Provo and Orem are safe because there are "more guns". Utah County is the most conservative county in the nation, with the city of Provo taking the title for the most conservative city in the US.
Another source.

An armed society is a polite society!
__________________
"In America, freedom and justice have always come from the ballot box, the jury box, and when that fails, the cartridge box."
-- Steve Symms, US Senator from Idaho, 1990
Plop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 16th, 2009, 10:14 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
press1280's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: WV
Posts: 591
press1280
"The more guns, the more opportunity for accidents, for misuse, for intentional crime in our halls and for the unimaginable catastrophes which have unfortunately befallen too many schools in the recent past."

So someone with a legal CCW will all of a sudden decide, hey, I'm going to commit a crime today? They don't point out the "catastrophes" in schools were not comitted by CCW holders, and were able to kill at will until people with guns(police) showed up.
__________________
And if the cabin door of the freedman is broken open and the intruder enters for purposes as vile as were known to slavery, then should a well-loaded musket be in the hand of the occupant to send the polluted wretch to another world, where his wretchedness will forever remain complete
press1280 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:36 PM.


bestBest selection of rifle scopes, holsters, belts, pouches, gun accessories, gun cases, dry boxes, flashlights, night vision, binoculars, sunglasses. Information and 1000's of military, law enforcement, tactical gear from OpticsPlanet and Tactical Store w/ FREE UPS! Top brands - 5.11, Bianchi, BlackHawk, Bushnell, EOT ech, Leupold, Pelican, Galco, Fobus, Safariland, Steiner, StreamLight, SureFire, Nikon, Trijicon, UnderArmour, Uncle Mike's, Wiley X,


CopsPlus Police Equipment
Police Equipment at CopsPlus.com

Hosted ByTranquil Hosting

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright DefensiveCarry.com © 2004-2009