CM9 vs Glock 43 size comparison: not much real-world difference

CM9 vs Glock 43 size comparison: not much real-world difference

This is a discussion on CM9 vs Glock 43 size comparison: not much real-world difference within the Defensive Carry Guns forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; I've always wanted to do a comparison thread but never had anything to add. Took my CM9 to the range today and had about 3 ...

Page 1 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 105
Like Tree181Likes

Thread: CM9 vs Glock 43 size comparison: not much real-world difference

  1. #1
    Member Array jpricewood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Louisville, USA
    Posts
    96

    CM9 vs Glock 43 size comparison: not much real-world difference

    I've always wanted to do a comparison thread but never had anything to add. Took my CM9 to the range today and had about 3 malfunctions in 100 rounds. This is after the break-in period in which I also experienced malfunctions. Anyways, I'm stubborn and have always felt that the CM9 is the best single stack 9 because of its size. Well, then a guy at the range let me try out the new rental Glock 43 that just came in. I was blown away. It isn't nearly as large as the stats had me thinking. So, I was convinced I had to have one. I called my local store and asked how long the waiting list was. They said it is first come first serve and that they just got one in last night. I rushed over and bought it. So, here are some comparison pics for those of you who may be considering these two pistols. CM9 vs Glock 43 size comparison: not much real-world difference-img_1791.jpgCM9 vs Glock 43 size comparison: not much real-world difference-img_1792.jpgCM9 vs Glock 43 size comparison: not much real-world difference-img_1806.jpgCM9 vs Glock 43 size comparison: not much real-world difference-img_1807.jpgCM9 vs Glock 43 size comparison: not much real-world difference-img_1808.jpg

    The Glock 43 is only noticeably larger in the slide length and just barely in the weight and height. The 43 is actually thinner in the slide and grip than the Kahr, but it still fills my hand because of the contour of the backstrap, and because it is decently thick front-to-back. It seems that Glock specs are based on maximum dimensions while Kahr specs are based on the minimum. I think the extra slide length will help for three reasons: less muzzle flip, great balance, and makes the grip of the 43 ride a bit higher in my pocket which makes it easier for me to draw. The 43 feels amazing to me, because I love the Glock angle and beaver-tail which keeps the pistol low in my hand. It functions just like my G19. The 43 also has a much easier slide to work than the CM9. The magazine design and trigger are also miles ahead of the CM9 IMO. Anyways, I hope you enjoy.

    Edit: The bullets are 124gr Hornady Custom (closet box to me). Each mag holds 6 rounds.
    If anyone is curious I also have a LCP, G19, SR40C, and LCR that I can compare it to if you need the info for other carry guns.
    Last edited by jpricewood; May 6th, 2015 at 01:06 AM.

  2. #2
    Member Array jpricewood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Louisville, USA
    Posts
    96
    CM9 vs Glock 43 size comparison: not much real-world difference-img_1798.jpgCM9 vs Glock 43 size comparison: not much real-world difference-img_1797.jpgCM9 vs Glock 43 size comparison: not much real-world difference-img_1799.jpgCM9 vs Glock 43 size comparison: not much real-world difference-img_1800.jpgCM9 vs Glock 43 size comparison: not much real-world difference-img_1801.jpgCM9 vs Glock 43 size comparison: not much real-world difference-img_1802.jpg
    glockstar, CDW4ME, drift and 1 others like this.

  3. #3
    Member Array jpricewood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Louisville, USA
    Posts
    96
    CM9 vs Glock 43 size comparison: not much real-world difference-img_1804.jpgCM9 vs Glock 43 size comparison: not much real-world difference-img_1803.jpgCM9 vs Glock 43 size comparison: not much real-world difference-img_1793.jpgCM9 vs Glock 43 size comparison: not much real-world difference-img_1794.jpgCM9 vs Glock 43 size comparison: not much real-world difference-img_1795.jpgCM9 vs Glock 43 size comparison: not much real-world difference-img_1796.jpg

  4. Remove Advertisements
    DefensiveCarry.com
    Advertisements
     

  5. #4
    Member Array jpricewood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Louisville, USA
    Posts
    96
    CM9 vs Glock 43 size comparison: not much real-world difference-img_1805.jpg
    CDW4ME, zerosoma and kerberos like this.

  6. #5
    Senior Member Array gregivq's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    668
    Thank you for the comparison. I'll pass on that Glock despite all of the glorious reports.

  7. #6
    Distinguished Member Array glockstar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    1,355
    yup, got my girl the pm9.

    She's in love.
    Czombie, TeflonDon and michael t like this.

  8. #7
    Senior Member Array DoctorBob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    591
    I'm on the blue label waiting list at our LGS for a G43. I have a G42 and love to carry it. Can't wait to hold the 43 in my hand.
    jpricewood, AZJD1968 and baren like this.
    'Guerir quelquefois, soulager souvent, consoler toujours.'

    "Socialism never took root in America because the poor see themselves not as an exploited proletariat but as temporarily embarrassed millionaires." (John Steinbeck)

    Good health actually just means dying at the slowest possible rate.

  9. #8
    VIP Member Array hardluk1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    nc mountains
    Posts
    3,506
    Why are you comparing a CM9 to a little glock 43 when the CW9 kahr is very closer to the same size ?? CW9 is 1/4" taller and 1/4" shorter with a 3.5" barrel . Did your cycling issues came after a shooting a while and why do you not add some to the grip for added traction like free used inner tube from a bike shop like the rest of use do for a bit more traction. 100 rounds at a section might be more than most people can control well. When group size start to open up STOP shooting before YOU cause cycling issues that may not happen other wise do to grip control . Nice to have a easier to control handgun along for a break . Your just comparing different handguns , Ones a good pocket pistol in most any pants or shorts the other and a better iwb far better suited to the a inside the waist holster . Put a metal base on the cw9 mag and its 1/8" closer to the glock height and still shorter over all. But it sounds like you not fond of a 1911 grip angle . That's what kahr has . The cw9 is far easier for the average person to shoot compared to the cm9

    I have very close 1800 rounds fired thru my cm9 in the 8 years I have had it and have not had a single problem with it from the very first round . I also don't try to shoot 100 rounds in one session . I'll shot 50 rounds then swap to my primary CC when braking it in .

    It does not matter to most what you carry . Just try not to compare apples and oranges like it means anything . You like a glock in general so buy the little one . I hate the grip angle . I can shoot them but find no reason to own them . Just hope the G43 starts off better than the G42.
    Katana1 and michael t like this.

  10. #9
    Member Array 303british's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    375
    Great job on the comparison, I am considering a single stack 9MM and the CM9 and 43 are on my list as is the Ruger LC9S.
    jpricewood likes this.
    Colour Sergeant Bourne: It's a miracle.

    Lieutenant John Chard: If it's a miracle, Colour Sergeant, it's a short chamber Boxer Henry .45 caliber miracle.

    Colour Sergeant Bourne: And a bayonet, sir, with some guts behind it.

  11. #10
    Ex Member Array CZRex's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Ga
    Posts
    232
    Quote Originally Posted by 303british View Post
    Great job on the comparison, I am considering a single stack 9MM and the CM9 and 43 are on my list as is the Ruger LC9S.
    why not consider something a little wider and heavier, like the wonderful CZ Rami? I've had the CM9, the PM9 and the MK9 and the CW9 and a Glock 26 and a 19 and NONE of them are as good as the Rami. I've heard some folks complain about .2 or .3 inches too much width. Really? The Rami is just as dependable as a Glock, but in my experiences, MUCH more accurate and drop dead gorgeous.
    ritepath and Rainsong like this.

  12. #11
    Member Array jpricewood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Louisville, USA
    Posts
    96
    Quote Originally Posted by hardluk1 View Post
    Why are you comparing a CM9 to a little glock 43 when the CW9 kahr is very closer to the same size ?? CW9 is 1/4" taller and 1/4" shorter with a 3.5" barrel . Did your cycling issues came after a shooting a while and why do you not add some to the grip for added traction like free used inner tube from a bike shop like the rest of use do for a bit more traction. 100 rounds at a section might be more than most people can control well. When group size start to open up STOP shooting before YOU cause cycling issues that may not happen other wise do to grip control . Nice to have a easier to control handgun along for a break . Your just comparing different handguns , Ones a good pocket pistol in most any pants or shorts the other and a better iwb far better suited to the a inside the waist holster . Put a metal base on the cw9 mag and its 1/8" closer to the glock height and still shorter over all. But it sounds like you not fond of a 1911 grip angle . That's what kahr has . The cw9 is far easier for the average person to shoot compared to the cm9

    I have very close 1800 rounds fired thru my cm9 in the 8 years I have had it and have not had a single problem with it from the very first round . I also don't try to shoot 100 rounds in one session . I'll shot 50 rounds then swap to my primary CC when braking it in .

    It does not matter to most what you carry . Just try not to compare apples and oranges like it means anything . You like a glock in general so buy the little one . I hate the grip angle . I can shoot them but find no reason to own them . Just hope the G43 starts off better than the G42.
    Honestly, this was just a simple, innocent comparison for those that might be interested. I happened to own the CM9 and just got the G43, so why not compare them? Why the hate? I'm not a firearm expert but I'm no dummy either. I have no interest in the CW9 because the grip is too long for my pocket. As I said, the G43 is very close in size to the CM9, which was a surprise to me. I bought the CM9 for its size because I like to pocket carry. The Glock's comparable size combined with the better trigger and a grip angle that better suits me gives it the win over the CM9. I'm no Glock fanboy. I'm actually a Ruger fanboy. These are all just my opinions. Oh, and the slide will be easier for my wife to operate if she wants to borrow it.

    As far a fatigue goes, I'm 27 and have vice grips for hands. 100 rounds really is not that hard for me to do. Plus, the CM9 has had many of its malfunctions early in my shooting sessions. I've had friends with unreliable Kahrs as well. Not bashing, just stating what I've experienced. I don't want to add a grip because that just adds weight and thickness.

    303british. The LC9s is a great pistol as well and I owned one for a short time. I just didn't keep it because the grip was a bit long for my pocket. The reset is also much longer than the G43.

  13. #12
    VIP Member
    Array sonnycrocket's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Miami Fla and TN
    Posts
    2,348
    I think its a great comparison if it were a PM9,CM9 lacks a few features to take the fight from the G43
    Kahrs PM9 is the original single stack 9MM the standard IMO which all others should be judged..Its smaller
    lighter,holds more bullets,has night sights,has more mags to choose from,made in usa... No brainer..
    I also think a Nano would give the 43 a run for its money..
    VBVAGUY likes this.

  14. #13
    VIP Member Array CLASS3NH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Bob from Southern New Hampshire
    Posts
    6,049
    I've compared the Glock 43, the PM/CM9 and the CM45 (which I have) along with the Shield,(I have that too) the LCP, and the PF9..(this one as well)
    I find the 43 to be right at about the same size and weight as the Shield. The PM/CM9 is smaller than the 43, but the CM45 is the same size (but not thickness) as the Shield.
    Come down to a toss up to what feels best in your hands.....As for me, I'm not hot for the 43 (we've got a couple dozen in stock right now, andpeople arn't beating the doors down for them either. I think it's a "wait and see" type of thought process right now..
    AnthonyC likes this.
    Why Waltz when you can Rock-N-Roll

  15. #14
    Member Array jpricewood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Louisville, USA
    Posts
    96
    I agree on the feel being a toss up. Like I said , these are just my opinions. I'm just the type who loves the Mark iii grip and dislikes the 22/45 grip. I guess that carries over some to carry guns.
    CLASS3NH and drift like this.

  16. #15
    Distinguished Member Array TIDEHSV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Huntsville, AL
    Posts
    1,585
    Quote Originally Posted by jpricewood View Post
    Honestly, this was just a simple, innocent comparison for those that might be interested. I happened to own the CM9 and just got the G43, so why not compare them? Why the hate? I'm not a firearm expert but I'm no dummy either. I have no interest in the CW9 because the grip is too long for my pocket. As I said, the G43 is very close in size to the CM9, which was a surprise to me. I bought the CM9 for its size because I like to pocket carry. The Glock's comparable size combined with the better trigger and a grip angle that better suits me gives it the win over the CM9. I'm no Glock fanboy. I'm actually a Ruger fanboy. These are all just my opinions. Oh, and the slide will be easier for my wife to operate if she wants to borrow it.

    As far a fatigue goes, I'm 27 and have vice grips for hands. 100 rounds really is not that hard for me to do. Plus, the CM9 has had many of its malfunctions early in my shooting sessions. I've had friends with unreliable Kahrs as well. Not bashing, just stating what I've experienced. I don't want to add a grip because that just adds weight and thickness.

    303british. The LC9s is a great pistol as well and I owned one for a short time. I just didn't keep it because the grip was a bit long for my pocket. The reset is also much longer than the G43.
    I'm afraid you've run into the "who cares" reaction. There are hundreds, if not thousands, of these "I love this gun over this other gun." I normally don't don't click on them, as most don't, and I'm not sure why I clicked on this one. You got a bad CM9 (maybe) and you love the G43. Great. Next?
    hardluk1, Czombie and TeflonDon like this.

Page 1 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 ... LastLast

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search tags for this page

cm9 vs g43
,
cm9 vs glock 43
,
g43 vs cm9
,
glock 43 vs cm9
,

glock 43 vs kahr cm9

,
glock 43 vs kahr cw9
,

glock 43 vs kahr pm9

,

kahr cm9 vs glock 43

,
kahr cw9 vs glock 43
,

kahr pm9 vs glock 43

,
kahr vs glock 43
,
pm9 vs glock 43
Click on a term to search for related topics.