Another revolver question

Another revolver question

This is a discussion on Another revolver question within the General Firearm Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; I recently purchased a S&W 442 with no internal lock that says 442-1 on inside of frame...Does anyone know when they first offered this gun? ...

Results 1 to 14 of 14
Like Tree24Likes
  • 5 Post By bmcgilvray
  • 1 Post By Cornhusker95
  • 5 Post By The Fish
  • 4 Post By Haywood
  • 2 Post By Haywood
  • 1 Post By duane_wade
  • 1 Post By CDRGlock
  • 4 Post By bmcgilvray
  • 1 Post By 71yancy

Thread: Another revolver question

  1. #1
    VIP Member Array Cornhusker95's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Nebraska
    Posts
    2,462

    Another revolver question

    I recently purchased a S&W 442 with no internal lock that says 442-1
    on inside of frame...Does anyone know when they first offered this gun?
    I know it is still in production but wanted a general idea on how long it may have set in the case
    before i bought it?

    Thanks

  2. #2
    Senior Moderator
    Array bmcgilvray's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    17,629
    The Model 442-1 revision was introduced in 1996.
    Charter Member of the DC .41 LC Society "Get heeled! No really"

    ďNo possible rapidity of fire can atone for habitual carelessness of aim with the first shot.Ē

    Theodore Roosevelt, The Wilderness Hunter, 1893

  3. #3
    VIP Member Array Cornhusker95's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Nebraska
    Posts
    2,462
    Quote Originally Posted by bmcgilvray View Post
    The Model 442-1 revision was introduced in 1996.
    Thank ya
    bmcgilvray likes this.

  4. Remove Advertisements
    DefensiveCarry.com
    Advertisements
     

  5. #4
    Senior Member Array The Fish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    The Beach of Boynton (FL)
    Posts
    1,005
    Were you worried it might have gone "stale" while in inventory?????
    MMinSC, Eagleks, ETXhiker and 2 others like this.
    " Keep On Packin' On The Bimah"

    U.S.A.F. 1966-1971 1821-H O-3

    N.R.A. R.S.O.

  6. #5
    VIP Member
    Array sonnycrocket's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Miami Fla and TN
    Posts
    2,442
    my 442 is a 442-1 no lock
    I bought it new about 6-7 years ago and carry it often
    Lifetime NRA Member,collector,reloader.

  7. #6
    VIP Member Array Haywood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    ohio
    Posts
    3,013
    I have Two of them and carry them daily.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Another revolver question-f92b44e2-8b4a-46cb-a229-902b52002ac0.jpeg  

    Two Revolvers, Two Reloads, every day, all day.

  8. #7
    Senior Member Array CDRGlock's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    933
    Quote Originally Posted by Haywood View Post
    I have Two of them and carry them daily.
    How do you carry those two? Is one for one hand versus the other? I was just curious since the grips are different.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
    NRA, Lifetime Member

  9. #8
    VIP Member Array Haywood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    ohio
    Posts
    3,013
    Quote Originally Posted by CDRGlock View Post
    How do you carry those two? Is one for one hand versus the other? I was just curious since the grips are different.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
    I got the Hogue Tamers just to try them. I ended up liking them enough to just keep them on. The Pachmayr Compacts Iíve had on J Frames for years. The Pachmayr gun is usually in my off hand pocket and the other is in or on the waist. I never could decide what grip I liked best. I think maybe the Pachmayrís.
    duane_wade and CDRGlock like this.
    Two Revolvers, Two Reloads, every day, all day.

  10. #9
    Member Array duane_wade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Location
    US
    Posts
    111
    Quote Originally Posted by Haywood View Post
    I got the Hogue Tamers just to try them. I ended up liking them enough to just keep them on. The Pachmayr Compacts Iíve had on J Frames for years. The Pachmayr gun is usually in my off hand pocket and the other is in or on the waist. I never could decide what grip I liked best. I think maybe the Pachmayrís.
    I've got Hogue grips on my 360 Airweight and really like the way they help with the felt recoil and seem more natural in my hand than the stock grips. Wish S&W would put Pachmahr or Hogue on the little guns and I think the reviews on the little guns would help with sales because a lot of people don't buy them because of the reports of snappy and painful recoil.

    Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
    Haywood likes this.

  11. #10
    Senior Member Array CDRGlock's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    933
    Quote Originally Posted by Haywood View Post
    I got the Hogue Tamers just to try them. I ended up liking them enough to just keep them on. The Pachmayr Compacts Iíve had on J Frames for years. The Pachmayr gun is usually in my off hand pocket and the other is in or on the waist. I never could decide what grip I liked best. I think maybe the Pachmayrís.
    I figured it was for different hands.

    I carry 3 guns. A S&W 640 357 Magnum 5 Shot in the pocket.

    Glock 19, Gen 5 IWB. Sig Sauer P365 appendix. However, I may be moving towards IWB on the left, and OWB on the right while keeping my S&W 640 357 Magnum 5 Shot in the pocket.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
    Haywood likes this.
    NRA, Lifetime Member

  12. #11
    Senior Moderator
    Array bmcgilvray's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    17,629
    One of the last new guns I ever bought to try because they were the current sensation on the market was a Smith & Wesson Model 642-1 that I have here. I bought it in summer of 1998. You wouldn't believe how "hot" these were in the market at that time. Everyone was raving about them. I felt like I had to get in the act and try one.

    I deliberately went for the Model 642 rather than the Model 442 that I really wanted so as to try a stainless version. I didn't care as much for the look of stainless steel. Still don't. I've always thought the Model 442 was the better looking of the two models. This is the last Smith & Wesson revolver I ever purchased brand new for design changes that I could not abide soon loomed on the horizon. Mainly the introduction of the "lock."

    The Model 642 here now wears a Tyler T-Grip as well as the "retro-looking" walnut stocks that are from the late 1960s or 1970s. The stocks with the T-Grip make for a nice handling "runt" revolver for me. Actually, Mrs. BMc has adopted this revolver as her daily carry. It doesn't look quite so fine now as it did way back when this photograph was taken.

    Charter Member of the DC .41 LC Society "Get heeled! No really"

    ďNo possible rapidity of fire can atone for habitual carelessness of aim with the first shot.Ē

    Theodore Roosevelt, The Wilderness Hunter, 1893

  13. #12
    Senior Member Array 71yancy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    591
    Quote Originally Posted by CDRGlock View Post

    I carry 3 guns. A S&W 640 357 Magnum 5 Shot in the pocket.

    Glock 19, Gen 5 IWB. Sig Sauer P365 appendix. However, I may be moving towards IWB on the left, and OWB on the right while keeping my S&W 640 357 Magnum 5 Shot in the pocket.
    I don't know the full details of the new proposed gun law in VA, but all I've seen is a limit on the capacity of a magazine. I assume your P365 would qualify with a 10 round magazine even with 1 more in the chamber since a 10 round magazine is the limit. Maybe it's only 10 total.

    But is there anything currently in the proposal to ban carrying additional guns at the same time which would take the total ammo numbers higher than 10 in guns without magazines. Iow, 2 or 3 revolvers.
    (just looking for loopholes)
    CDRGlock likes this.

  14. #13
    Senior Member Array CDRGlock's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    933
    Quote Originally Posted by 71yancy View Post
    I don't know the full details of the new proposed gun law in VA, but all I've seen is a limit on the capacity of a magazine. I assume your P365 would qualify with a 10 round magazine even with 1 more in the chamber since a 10 round magazine is the limit. Maybe it's only 10 total.

    But is there anything currently in the proposal to ban carrying additional guns at the same time which would take the total ammo numbers higher than 10 in guns without magazines. Iow, 2 or 3 revolvers.
    (just looking for loopholes)
    I donít think theyíre that far, yet.

    Just banning assault weapons, suppressors, outdoor ranges, shotguns with pistol grips, red flag laws, background checks. Turning into California I guess. I think I may move away from here. Itís too bad. They donít have enough doctors here in my area. I also donate a lot of time and money to childrenís charities, here. But if that is what they want (to alienate the lawful and productive), itís their problem.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
    NRA, Lifetime Member

  15. #14
    VIP Member Array Cornhusker95's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Nebraska
    Posts
    2,462
    Quote Originally Posted by bmcgilvray View Post
    One of the last new guns I ever bought to try because they were the current sensation on the market was a Smith & Wesson Model 642-1 that I have here. I bought it in summer of 1998. You wouldn't believe how "hot" these were in the market at that time. Everyone was raving about them. I felt like I had to get in the act and try one.

    I deliberately went for the Model 642 rather than the Model 442 that I really wanted so as to try a stainless version. I didn't care as much for the look of stainless steel. Still don't. I've always thought the Model 442 was the better looking of the two models. This is the last Smith & Wesson revolver I ever purchased brand new for design changes that I could not abide soon loomed on the horizon. Mainly the introduction of the "lock."

    The Model 642 here now wears a Tyler T-Grip as well as the "retro-looking" walnut stocks that are from the late 1960s or 1970s. The stocks with the T-Grip make for a nice handling "runt" revolver for me. Actually, Mrs. BMc has adopted this revolver as her daily carry. It doesn't look quite so fine now as it did way back when this photograph was taken.

    I bought a pair of grips like those but they have no texture...Gonna send them back...They are too slick without
    texture....I should have known better

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •