Walmart "Terrorist" sentenced after pleading to a lesser charge - Page 6

Walmart "Terrorist" sentenced after pleading to a lesser charge

This is a discussion on Walmart "Terrorist" sentenced after pleading to a lesser charge within the In the News: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly forums, part of the The Back Porch category; Originally Posted by Havok There was no mention of criminals or any crime in my post. Have you noticed that it is you, then everyone ...

Page 6 of 9 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 LastLast
Results 76 to 90 of 122
Like Tree203Likes

Thread: Walmart "Terrorist" sentenced after pleading to a lesser charge

  1. #76
    Senior Member Array KevinRohrer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Medina, Ohio
    Posts
    792
    Quote Originally Posted by Havok View Post
    There was no mention of criminals or any crime in my post.
    Have you noticed that it is you, then everyone else. You are Trolling, and this is not the first time.
    Member: Orange Gunsite Family, NRA--Life, American Legion

  2. #77
    VIP Member Array Nmuskier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Upper Michigan
    Posts
    5,078
    Quote Originally Posted by Havok View Post
    Not really. The guy in Walmart could be an off duty cop for all you know.
    Dude. You aren't seriously making that argument? The off duty cop is putting on SWAT gear in the parking lot to go shopping? I can't take this opinion seriously.

    The guy in Walmart could figure that if people in this world exist that make police need rifles and body armor, then they need rifles and body armor.
    We don't need to infer. We have evidence that he did this as a "social experiment". He does not think as you suggested.
    Psalm 144:1

  3. #78
    VIP Member Array Havok's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    US
    Posts
    6,736
    Quote Originally Posted by KevinRohrer View Post
    Have you noticed that it is you, then everyone else. You are Trolling, and this is not the first time.
    I stated facts. You're putting more effort into spinning my comments than CNN.
    Quote Originally Posted by Nmuskier View Post
    Dude. You aren't seriously making that argument? The off duty cop is putting on SWAT gear in the parking lot to go shopping? I can't take this opinion seriously.



    We don't need to infer. We have evidence that he did this as a "social experiment". He does not think as you suggested.
    We also know now that he wasnt shooting up walmart. At the time, he was just a guy with stuff that he legally owned, and could wear. This is reality, whether you like it or not.
    johndp1911 likes this.
    We get the government we deserve.

  4. Remove Advertisements
    DefensiveCarry.com
    Advertisements
     

  5. #79
    Member Array MYMOMSSON's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Posts
    48
    Quote Originally Posted by Havok View Post
    I stated facts. You're putting more effort into spinning my comments than CNN.

    We also know now that he wasnt shooting up walmart. At the time, he was just a guy with stuff that he legally owned, and could wear. This is reality, whether you like it or not.
    Legal? Maybe. Smart? Definetly not. You can't argue that.

  6. #80
    VIP Member Array Havok's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    US
    Posts
    6,736
    Quote Originally Posted by MYMOMSSON View Post
    Legal? Maybe. Smart? Definetly not. You can't argue that.
    Sure I could. Most people here only support other people carrying the way they do, so it doesn't really matter.
    Bikenut and johndp1911 like this.
    We get the government we deserve.

  7. #81
    Member Array MYMOMSSON's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Posts
    48
    Quote Originally Posted by Havok View Post
    Sure I could. Most people here only support other people carrying the way they do, so it doesn't really matter.
    I respect your opinion though I totally disagree with it.
    Havok likes this.

  8. #82
    JD
    JD is offline
    Administrator
    Array JD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Central Iowa
    Posts
    20,654
    Quote Originally Posted by Havok View Post
    I stated facts. You're putting more effort into spinning my comments than CNN.

    We also know now that he wasnt shooting up walmart. At the time, he was just a guy with stuff that he legally owned, and could wear. This is reality, whether you like it or not.
    And the reality is also that he was arrested, charged and accepted a plea deal conviction for it.

    Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

  9. #83
    Senior Member Array johndp1911's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    565
    Quote Originally Posted by Havok View Post
    We also know now that he wasnt shooting up walmart. At the time, he was just a guy with stuff that he legally owned, and could wear. This is reality, whether you like it or not.
    Correct, and I'd like to add that he got permission before doing so.
    Havok and Risasi like this.

  10. #84
    Senior Member Array Bikenut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Location
    Too close to Saginaw Mi.
    Posts
    882
    Quote Originally Posted by JD View Post
    Originally Posted by Havok View Post
    I stated facts. You're putting more effort into spinning my comments than CNN.

    We also know now that he wasnt shooting up walmart. At the time, he was just a guy with stuff that he legally owned, and could wear. This is reality, whether you like it or not.
    And the reality is also that he was arrested, charged and accepted a plea deal conviction for it.

    Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
    Yes, we know the reality is the Walmart fellow was punished for exercising the right to bear arms in a legal manner with Walmart's permission.

    And from discussions on this, and other gun forums, we also know the reality is lots of pro gun folks (who say they support the right to bear arms) agree with that punishment just because they don't like where, when, why, and how the the guy exercised the right to bear arms. With permission from the property owner's representative no less!
    Havok and johndp1911 like this.
    Character is doing the right thing when nobody's looking. There are too many people who think that the only thing that's right is to get by, and the only thing that's wrong is to get caught. ~J.C. Watts

  11. #85
    VIP Member Array Havok's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    US
    Posts
    6,736
    Quote Originally Posted by JD View Post
    And the reality is also that he was arrested, charged and accepted a plea deal conviction for it.

    Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
    He was guilty of someone else calling the police. Give me a break. Let’s not pretend people don’t plead guilty to stuff like this to avoid being railroaded by the “justice” system.
    We get the government we deserve.

  12. #86
    JD
    JD is offline
    Administrator
    Array JD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Central Iowa
    Posts
    20,654
    Not really seeing how he didn't violate this statute.

    Is it a bad law? Probably. Does context matter? Absolutely.

    The majority of the firearms community does not support the open carry of long guns.

    You have the right to do it.

    We have the right to think you're a retard for doing so.

    Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

  13. #87
    VIP Member Array Havok's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    US
    Posts
    6,736
    Quote Originally Posted by JD View Post
    Not really seeing how he didn't violate this statute.

    Is it a bad law? Probably. Does context matter? Absolutely.

    The majority of the firearms community does not support the open carry of long guns.

    You have the right to do it.

    We have the right to think you're a retard for doing so.

    Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
    He was not convicted of making a terroristic threat. I also dont know how you think he did violate that statute.
    We get the government we deserve.

  14. #88
    JD
    JD is offline
    Administrator
    Array JD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Central Iowa
    Posts
    20,654
    I'll circle the part that applies in this situation as presented by the store employe / witnesses.



    Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

  15. #89
    VIP Member Array Havok's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    US
    Posts
    6,736
    Quote Originally Posted by JD View Post
    I'll circle the part that applies in this situation as presented by the store employe / witnesses.



    Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
    He did not do that and was not convicted of that. You seem desperate to punish someone for doing something that you dont like.
    johndp1911 likes this.
    We get the government we deserve.

  16. #90
    JD
    JD is offline
    Administrator
    Array JD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Central Iowa
    Posts
    20,654
    He absolutely did do that and that's why he took the plea. Had he gone to trail for the initial charge (what I am referencing) I don't think he would have won.

    I'm not punishing the dude, I'm glad he got out of the felony conviction.



    Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Page 6 of 9 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 LastLast

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •