This is a discussion on 467 People In FL Ordered To Turn In Guns within the The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; Originally Posted by Mike1956 RINO, lame-duck Kasich is pushing for one here, as well in gearing up for his 2020 presidential run. He's finished.........he won ...
I didn't attend his funeral, but I sent a nice letter saying I approved of it.
It does matter who you vote for, and this is a prime example. Hopefully there will be enough politicians with a backbone to fight this.
Even folks that claim to pro 2ndA are supporting this knee jerk hogwash.
It blows my mind how gullible and ignorant some people can be.
I have read the entire thread and I am not real sure what the question is but I am completely sure that the answer is "NO".
Audemus jura nostra defendere
SI VIS PACEM PARA BELLUM
The criminal justice system is the real threat. It is a revolving door three ring circus and judges are the ring masters.
Montani Semper Liberi
Mountaineers are Always Free!
We get the government we deserve.
Hmmm...........467 people. Guess there were no "cold dead hands" types among them. I think this demonstrates exactly how gun confiscation will look like. When civilians are ordered to turn them in, the vast majority will turn them in. When law enforcement officers are ordered to seize civilian weapon, the vast majority will seize civilian weapons.
"Some people go to bed with Lucifer..........then cry, cry, cry when they don't greet the day with God."
Civil suits against those who falsely accuse under Red Flag?
Isnít a Red Flag report subject to false reporting laws? In those cases, the police and their time is purposely being abused the same as with any false report.
I assume if youíve been Red Flagged you also are not able to purchase a firearm. If not, whatís the point of taking a man's gun he can just go buy another?
Normally, if a person is disarmed by the law but there are no charges filed, the weapon is returned. I can see the possibility of a guy with a legal gun on him or in his car getting Red Flagged for disputing an infraction with a traffic cop. Cop gets pissed, Red Flags the guy for being irrational and behaving in a ďhostile fashion.Ē If the law is available to police chiefs who oppose gun ownership or carry, things could get interesting, indeed.
Wife has an affair. Husband is pissed and contentious divorce ensues? Wife reports that husband is a gun owner. Confiscated gun collection worth thousands of dollars canít be returned to the guy after divorce (lest he seek revenge with them) so they are awarded to the cheating wife. Talk about insult to injury.
Equal protection? Why do we have a law geared only toward protecting people from being shot? For example, a person triggers a Red Flag report and the reporting person says he owns a gun. Upon investigating, itís found he sold his gun the month before.
A: Do the cops just leave him alone Ė a man they believe to be a likely danger to the public Ė just because he doesnít own a gun?
B: Since if he had owned a gun the cops would have confiscated it under Red Flag, is his right to buy a gun terminated under Red Flag?
Should those on forumís and other social media be careful of what they post, lest they provide evidence that could be used to justify being Red Flagged?
We get the government we deserve.