I have the hammerless SP-101 and have tried it out as a pocket model. Just won't work for me. Too doggone big and heavy for the pocket. FWIW:danceban:
I have the hammerless SP-101 and have tried it out as a pocket model. Just won't work for me. Too doggone big and heavy for the pocket. FWIW:danceban:But do you find the SP101 (hammerless or not) workable for the pocket?
I have the S&W M60, I think it's about an ounce less than the SP101, fits real good in either front or back pocket. I carry it in my back pocket, in a pocket holster, hardly know it's there. The pocket holster makes a big difference.Just curious. The new LCR looks somewhat appealing, but I just can't get past the fact that it's a .380. I need my .357 or .45, personally.
But do you find the SP101 (hammerless or not) workable for the pocket?
Agreed.You have to shop for pants with the right pockets, and wear a good belt to hold them up, but yes, an SP101 can work in a pocket rig.
Works, with a 3&1/16 barrel one needs a deep pocket or a small rag stuffed in the top of the pocket. I would guess the shorter barrel would not need the rag. I have a normal hammer.Just curious. The new LCR looks somewhat appealing, but I just can't get past the fact that it's a .380. I need my .357 or .45, personally.
But do you find the SP101 (hammerless or not) workable for the pocket?
Just for the record the Ruger LCR is a .38 SPL rated for +P rounds. Hardly a pud cartridge. It is not a .380 acp. (don't know if you had a typo or not)Just curious. The new LCR looks somewhat appealing, but I just can't get past the fact that it's a .380. I need my .357 or .45, personally.
But do you find the SP101 (hammerless or not) workable for the pocket?
No, it's not a pud but it's still not a .357 magnum. Maybe it's just a psychological thing with me. I need my .357 magnum or .45 ACP.Just for the record the Ruger LCR is a .38 SPL rated for +P rounds. Hardly a pud cartridge. It is not a .380 acp. (don't know if you had a typo or not)