I guess that totally supports it, he couldn't!grnzbra said:Hmmmm. So what does that do the victim's story that he just couldn't shoot the kid in the head?
That all depends on where you shoot 'em.dpesec said:Hi Gabe,
I don't think a .45 could have done much damage to a person with a flak vest plus Level II armor
WTH!!!!!!! Sorry folks but here I am, not smoking anything illegal - not doped up meds or drugs - and yet I find my head shaking side to side in amazement."He didn't go to the mall to shoot anybody. He didn't go to the mall to rob a bank. He didn't go there to take hostages. He went there ostensibly to make a statement," Sverre Staurset said
So he (Maldonado)will have the opportunity to do it again. Carrying for "defense" means that if you use it, you won't have to use it against the same assailant twice. The road to Hell is paved with good intentions....and the blood of fools.XD40 said:That comment and other information from McKown could help justify the attempted-murder charge by showing Maldonado arrived at the mall with killing on his mind, prosecutors said.