Defensive Carry banner

Would Biden and the Democrats invite UN Troops onto U.S. soil to help confiscate Guns by force?

  • Yes

    Votes: 21 63.6%
  • No

    Votes: 12 36.4%
1 - 20 of 48 Posts

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
7,231 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Biden Administration Moves to Reinstate UN Small Arms Treaty that Trump Nixed

by JORDAN MICHAELSon SEPTEMBER 7, 2021

Related Tags: Buzz, News

3311542781_6175233576_o.jpg


The U.N. treaty could force the U.S. to keep a record of the “end users” of all firearm imports. (Photo: United Nations)

GunsAmerica readers might remember when former President Donald Trump backed out of the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty at the NRA show in 2019. The move was hailed as a reaffirmation of national sovereignty and a commitment to keeping European bureaucrats out of U.S. gun policy.

Now, it looks like the Biden Administration is working to put U.S. gun owners under international control.

William Malzahn, a U.S. State Department official at the Office of Conventional Arms Threat Reduction, assured his European counterparts at a recent conference that the Biden Administration remains committed to “strong and effective” controls on conventional arms, according to a transcript obtained by Breitbart News:

I have come from Washington D.C. this week to take the floor on the agenda item Treaty Universalization to underscore the continuing commitment of the United States to responsible international trade in conventional arms. The United States has long supported strong and effective national controls on the international transfer of conventional arms, and the Arms Trade Treaty is an important tool from promoting those controls internationally.

The National Rifle Association warned back in 2013 that the treaty would impose a registration scheme on imported firearms by requiring each state party to maintain “national records” on the “end users” of imported firearms “for a minimum of ten years.”

The Obama administration made the treaty a priority, but it remained inoperative because the U.S. Senate never gave its approval.

Still, Obama’s Secretary of State John Kerry had signed the treaty, which prompted President Trump to revoke that signature in 2016. “We will never surrender American sovereignty to anyone,” Trump said during his NRAAM address that year. “We are taking our signature back.”

This latest move by the Biden Administration could indicate that Secretary of State Antony Blinken plans to sign it once again.

If that happens, it’s highly unlikely that the Senate will agree to ratify.

The Constitution requires two-thirds of the Senate (67 members) to approve any treaty signed by the president or secretary of state. Since Democrats only hold a one-vote majority, they would need 17 Republicans to join them in signing.

President Biden has been mostly stymied in his attempts to restrict Second Amendments rights domestically.

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives is set to adopt rules redefining “firearms” and banning arm braces, but the Democrat-controlled Congress has failed to pass any of Biden’s other agenda items.

In his recent weeks, however, the administration has worked to restrict firearms and ammunition imports, a sector where the White House has more power to act unilaterally. Biden’s officials announced last month new sanctions on Russian ammunition, which could dry up supplies from that country if they are not lifted within the next few years.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
2,614 Posts
So…..OUR troops are prohibited from enforcing laws on US citizens, but our government would allow foreign troops to do just that……someone pinch me……
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
44,688 Posts
Treaties are left up to the Senate for approval. Vote Republican--unless you have the RINOs I have.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
10,506 Posts
What's the matter with y'all.
You are not ready for that one world order, That Globalism is the future?
Borders, Countries, culture are so yesterday.
Blue helmets make for some fine target practice.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,673 Posts
Oh, great, I'd forgotten about that!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
395 Posts
Would Biden and the Democrats invite UN Troops onto U.S. soil to help confiscate Guns by force?

I looked at my inventory of things to worry about and realized that in order to devote one molecule of concern to this ludicrous notion I would have to remove something less important from my list of pending catastrophes. The only thing that comes close is the total collapse of the Yellowstone Caldera into a fiery sinkhole.

I am sticking with the apocalyptic eruption of the high plains happening way before I see UN troops free ranging in America.

 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
3,495 Posts
Treaties are left up to the Senate for approval. Vote Republican--unless you have the RINOs I have.
The midterm election results are going to be very interesting to see.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
3,495 Posts
What's the matter with y'all.
You are not ready for that one world order, That Globalism is the future?
Borders, Countries, culture are so yesterday.
Blue helmets make for some fine target practice.
I like Star Trek but I don't go for the one world government concept as well as some of the other liberal nonsense that's presented in ST. If that ever does happen, I don't see it happening in my lifetime.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
3,495 Posts
Would Biden and the Democrats invite UN Troops onto U.S. soil to help confiscate Guns by force?

I looked at my inventory of things to worry about and realized that in order to devote one molecule of concern to this ludicrous notion I would have to remove something less important from my list of pending catastrophes. The only thing that comes close is the total collapse of the Yellowstone Caldera into a fiery sinkhole.

I am sticking with the apocalyptic eruption of the high plains happening way before I see UN troops free ranging in America.
Speaking of Yellowstone, with the western wildfires putting so much smoke in the air and reducing sunshine here in Nebraska, I'd hate to see what an eruption at Yellowstone would do.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
10,506 Posts
Speaking of Yellowstone, with the western wildfires putting so much smoke in the air and reducing sunshine here in Nebraska, I'd hate to see what an eruption at Yellowstone would do.
If that super volcano erupted you would not see anything.
Life here as we know it will be over.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
6,592 Posts
Come and take it.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,928 Posts
This again??
The UN isn't coming for your guns. There aren't secret UN bases scattered across the country. That black suv you see driving in your neighborhood isn't the cia/fbi/nsa its the neighbor from down the street you haven't bothered to meet and get to know because your too busy on the internet.
The helicopter I can't explain.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
2,614 Posts
This again??
The UN isn't coming for your guns. There aren't secret UN bases scattered across the country. That black suv you see driving in your neighborhood isn't the cia/fbi/nsa its the neighbor from down the street you haven't bothered to meet and get to know because your too busy on the internet.
The helicopter I can't explain.
🤣🤣🤣
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,792 Posts
Isn't that what M855 ammo is for?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,748 Posts
I would have no problem with one world government if it were structured the way that the founders of this country intended ours to be before the "progressives" started dismantling it. And anyone who wants anything that I have is more than welcome to come and try to take it from me.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
587 Posts
Come and take it.
Believe it or not, the University of Texas at San Antonio has dropped that revolutionary slogan from being used at its campus events such as football games. Some there claim it is “anti-Mexican” and the usual, tired “racist” claim.
I guess those ignorant woke idiots never studied Greek history, or who the Texas rebels were fighting against in their revolution.

 
1 - 20 of 48 Posts
Top