Defensive Carry banner

1 - 7 of 7 Posts

·
Super Moderator
Joined
·
24,281 Posts
Discussion Starter #1 (Edited)
The Dallas Police recently revised their "chase" policy to ONLY pursue fleeing Felons. In Dallas, non-felons only need to FLEE and police pursuit will CEASE! Amazing! The policy reason appears sound on the surface, but is ludicrous in practice IMHO.

The DPD also has ceased responding to security alarms - just watch the burglarly rate rise!

Edited to add: Dallas Mayor Laura Miller attended the Bloomberg anti-gun summit last month!:gah:

I'd love to hear the thoughts of those more experienced in these matters.

Revamped chase policy aims for safety:Guidelines among the most stringent in U.S.

11:35 PM CDT on Friday, June 2, 2006

By TANYA EISERER / The Dallas Morning News

Police chases are about to take a different turn in Dallas.

Dallas police will still pursue fleeing motorists who have committed violent felonies. Other suspects may have to be arrested another time.

Police Chief David Kunkle announced Friday that he was implementing a tough new police-pursuit policy.

"In my view, the city will be a much safer place to live," Chief Kunkle said. "We'll have fewer citizens killed and injured as a result of this policy and fewer officers injured or killed."

He said he decided to tighten the policy because of the "inherent danger of pursuits" and because he didn't feel he could justify letting officers chase suspects for minor offenses, such as running a red light, shoplifting or driving while intoxicated. According to news accounts, at least 10 people have died in accidents involving police chases since 2004. Six of those died in 2005.

The new policy, which is expected to be implemented soon, will place the following restrictions on chases:

• Only offenders suspected of violent felonies – such as kidnapping, rape, murder or robbery – will be pursued.

• Officers may pursue a fleeing motorist based only on what they know about the person. They can't make assumptions.

• When officers from other jurisdictions enter the city, Dallas officers will join in only if the person fleeing is suspected of a violent felony.

Under the previous policy, Dallas officers could chase drivers for traffic violations and other Class C misdemeanors until it was "apparent that the violator will do whatever is necessary to evade the officer."

Dallas' new chase policy will be among the most stringent in the nation and similar to those in place in Phoenix and Orlando, Fla. The new policy would be tougher than the policies in place in other North Texas cities such as Arlington, Richardson and Fort Worth.

"I believe we will establish a new standard for pursuits in North Texas," Chief Kunkle said.

Geoffrey P. Alpert, a professor of criminology at the University of South Carolina who has written extensively on police chases, praised the changes and said he hoped rank-and-file officers would be supportive.

Chief Kunkle has "taken a huge step forward, a very progressive step forward in making Dallas a safer place," Dr. Alpert said. "It's what progressive chiefs are doing in other cities."

Reaction from the department's police associations was muted, with several leaders saying they did not want to comment because they had not had a chance to review the new policy.

Some police officials expected that the department's rank and file would be strongly against such a change.

Senior Cpl. Glenn White, president of the Dallas Police Association, said the day might come when police don't chase a suspect who, it later turns out, has kidnapped a young child.

"But preventing injuries to officers is important, and preventing injuries to citizens is also important," Cpl. White said.

Lt. Rick Andrews, head of the Dallas Police Executive Lodge, which represents higher-ranking officers, said he had not seen the policy but it appeared that the chief's "heart was in the right place" and that he was trying to make the city safer.

Lt. Andrews had previously said he did not favor tightening the chase policy because he feared it would encourage criminal behavior.

Chief Kunkle ordered a review of the chase policy after a fatal August 2004 pursuit in which a man fleeing in a stolen vehicle struck and killed another motorist. Under the new policy, motor vehicle theft would not be cause for a chase.

The new policy would have eliminated as much as two-thirds of all police pursuits last year, and perhaps more. In 2005, there were about 355 police pursuits. Roughly 230 of those were for traffic violations and stolen vehicles.

So far this year, there have been about 140 pursuits and one death, in late May, involving Dallas police. That includes about 55 pursuits for traffic violations and about 25 pursuits of stolen vehicles.

The death in May might not have involved Dallas police if the new policy had been in effect.

That pursuit began when a Dallas County constable tried to stop a car with a missing inspection sticker and an expired registration. The chase ended when a Dallas police squad car and a car driven by a fleeing motorist slammed into each other in Far East Dallas. The fleeing motorist died. A passenger in the fleeing car and the officer were both injured.

Two recent police chases crystallized Chief Kunkle's decision to sharply limit when his officers may engage in hot pursuits.

A mid-March pursuit over $600 worth of stolen merchandise involved speeds of up to 115 mph and ended near downtown with the fleeing motorist crashing head-on into a squad car and hitting two more vehicles.

In a pursuit about a month later, a man carjacked a woman at gunpoint and fled from police at high speeds before hitting a vehicle and injuring the woman and a young child inside.

Pursuing a violent offender, Chief Kunkle said, "was necessary to make the city safer." But, he added, he couldn't justify chasing after a shoplifting suspect and endangering others.

Staff writer Holly Yan contributed to this report.
 

·
Super Moderator
Joined
·
18,127 Posts
Pursuing a violent offender, Chief Kunkle said, "was necessary to make the city safer." But, he added, he couldn't justify chasing after a shoplifting suspect and endangering others.
Baloney.

Unless they have had a disproportinate amount of officers wrecks during pursuits...its no more than more being "politicaly correct" B.S.

A couple of years ago the city that I work and play in decided on a no pursuit policy. As a deputy that wasnt hindered by that, I cant tell you how many times we got calls from dispatch of a fleeing vehicle about to leave city limits. Naturally, anyone close by would set up and be ready. If you ran on us, you got pursued and when we stopped you, it was a felony stop at gunpoint.

That no pursuit policy only encourages stupid people to do stupid things and they take advantage of it once the word gets out.

I've have even had people argue with us that we illegally pursued them and illegally arrested them cause its dept.policy to not pursue and that their lawyer was gonna tear us up in court.

Normally I dont say much to idiots, but on a few occasions I've simply said "look at my uniform, I'm not a city offcer." In which case they either get quite or start quoting the law to me.

Thankfully, cooler heads prevailed and the city PD resinded their policy after it was evident that people were speeding and driving recklessly just to make it out of city limits.


and BTW...notice the word "progressive" any time its used by a city council member or a police chief, it usually means that they are trying to reinvent the wheel, or they wanto be part of a kinder,gentler,touchy feely force where felons are treated with kiddy gloves so as not to damage their egos.:aargh4: :twak:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
998 Posts
Personally, I hate vehicle chases. There is no need for a vehicle chase over an expired tag or nonviolent misdemeanor.

I don't know how they can justify not responding to alarm calls though.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
269 Posts
but it appeared that the chief's "heart was in the right place"
Well heck, if his heart is in the right place, that's all that matter's, right?:rolleyes:
The new policy would have eliminated as much as two-thirds of all police pursuits last year, and perhaps more.
Just think of all the fuel they will save! :rolleyes:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
615 Posts
Just another example of our more "tolerant" society. It started years ago and just seems to perpetuate. I expect someday our bleeding heart liberal leaders will come up with a scheme to make "payments" to BGs to leave the "sheeple" alone.:mad:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
574 Posts
CombatEffective said:
Personally, I hate vehicle chases. There is no need for a vehicle chase over an expired tag or nonviolent misdemeanor.

I don't know how they can justify not responding to alarm calls though.
Say, let's go to Dallas and rob some banks! I mean, since they're not going to respond to alarm calls, might as well, right? :image035:
 
1 - 7 of 7 Posts
Top