"Running the gun" to me invokes the user's competency to not just shoot the gun, but also to quickly and deliberately identify and fix malfunctions when they occur, as well as reloading the gun in a satisfactory manner in order to minimize the amount of time the gun is either down for mechanical or ammunition related reasons.Thoughts?
Definition of either or both?
"Running the gun" to me invokes the user's competency to not just shoot the gun, but also to quickly and deliberately identify and fix malfunctions when they occur, as well as reloading the gun in a satisfactory manner in order to minimize the amount of time the gun is either down for mechanical or ammunition related reasons.
Plus 1 to both of these.As I've seen it there are folks that can shoot, but cannot "run the gun".
By definition of "run the gun" I mean; beyond basic operation, familiarity of the controls, reloads, "feel" going to slide lock, and remedial action drills all under some time constraints/stress. Familiarity to the point it doesn't take thought. Whereas a decent shot can normally "hit" ok-to-well with a gun they're not all that familiar with.
Chuck
But can they hit the target?There are also people who can "run the gun" - move and shoot, smoking fast double taps, reload quickly, clear malfunctions... and who couldn't hit the broadside of a barn if they were standing inside.
Source: I used to be one of those guys. I still have relapses.
If they couldn't, they weren't running the gun to begin with. It's a level that's mastered only after one can shoot and make hits.But can they hit the target?
Thanks for the post Chuck, I think you'll like this:As I've seen it there are folks that can shoot, but cannot "run the gun".
By definition of "run the gun" I mean; beyond basic operation, familiarity of the controls, reloads, "feel" going to slide lock, and remedial action drills all under some time constraints/stress. Familiarity to the point it doesn't take thought. Whereas a decent shot can normally "hit" ok-to-well with a gun they're not all that familiar with.
Chuck
That's how I see it as well."Running the gun" to me invokes the user's competency to not just shoot the gun, but also to quickly and deliberately identify and fix malfunctions when they occur, as well as reloading the gun in a satisfactory manner in order to minimize the amount of time the gun is either down for mechanical or ammunition related reasons.
Now thats an analogy I can understand :smile: Most Schutzhund dogs lack true fight drive. They operate in pure prey drive, just a big game to alot of them. Have to say it's not all, have seen some really tough good protection dogs come out of Schutzhund. A Shepherd or any other dog without a "clear head" and true fight drive could not be counted on to protect. Have done some decoy work on dogs that were supposed to be protection dogs,,,,wouldn't have them protecting my family.How about another analogy while I'm on a roll? :wink:
Shutzhund.
Do you know how many Shutzhund dogs make terrible personal protection dogs? A lot.
It's a whole nuther way of training. Bark and hold, working blinds, no real pressure. Nobody trying to make the dog back down. Everything in prey and nothing in defense. It sure does show good training though.
There has to be a special category of Darwin Award for someone who starts a gunfight with Jerry Miculek.Can Jerry Miculek run his gun? Damn straight he can. Does that equate to him being able to handle himself in a self defense situation? I have no idea. Maybe he can.
I think the fight would be over quickly.There has to be a special category of Darwin Award for someone who starts a gunfight with Jerry Miculek.
Do we know if he even carries a sd sidearm to begin with? I know Leatham, for years was the top dog in the world, and didn't carry a gun for sd. He may now, not sure. Surprised the hell out of a lot of people Robbie didn't carry one daily. We share the same home rangeThere has to be a special category of Darwin Award for someone who starts a gunfight with Jerry Miculek.