After scoping out the situation with ammo these days, it seems to me that 38sp+p rounds are not only hard to come by but high priced !
Because of this, I am semi-abanondoning my ideas of lots of shooting and going back to the reason I got back into the gun shopping in the first place. home/personal protection minimums.
Today I only have one gun, a taurus ultralight that I haven't shot in a while. For home protection it's inadequate because I have an upstairs and a downstairs, and I have to move the gun around all the time. ( My wife doesn't want to see it, doesn't like guns ).
So what I'm thinking now is to buy 2 more guns, keep one upstairs in the nightstand, one downstairs in the kitchen upper cabinet that I can reach pretty quickly and one in the car that I can also stick in a pocket if I feel the need.
Of course I am going to spend some time shooting them to at least build a bit of confidence/skill that I can hit what I aim at within 5-7 yards, but knowing me, unless I start to get into it more, I will then only go to the range once or twice a year.
I do know I will probably get some advice now about qualifying myself more, and I'd like to believe me, but time and $$$ make it less of an attractive choice to me.
Hopefully I will eventually take a carry course or two, and maybe find a comfortable way to carry on my person more regularly, but for right now my thinking is to just make a weapon more available most of the time.
My real question is, I am thinking of complimenting my taurus with 2 ruger lcr's. They seem to be the cheapest option that's also got reliability behind them. I hear a lot of chatter about Taurus being hit or miss in reliability, and about the locking issues on the Smith's.
The other choices would have been a 637 or 642 and some taurus UL series.
Any thoughts/comments about the gun selection for the 1 extra house gun and 1 car/carry gun would be appreciated, before I finally go to gunbroker and spend my $$.
Thanks,
floyd
Because of this, I am semi-abanondoning my ideas of lots of shooting and going back to the reason I got back into the gun shopping in the first place. home/personal protection minimums.
Today I only have one gun, a taurus ultralight that I haven't shot in a while. For home protection it's inadequate because I have an upstairs and a downstairs, and I have to move the gun around all the time. ( My wife doesn't want to see it, doesn't like guns ).
So what I'm thinking now is to buy 2 more guns, keep one upstairs in the nightstand, one downstairs in the kitchen upper cabinet that I can reach pretty quickly and one in the car that I can also stick in a pocket if I feel the need.
Of course I am going to spend some time shooting them to at least build a bit of confidence/skill that I can hit what I aim at within 5-7 yards, but knowing me, unless I start to get into it more, I will then only go to the range once or twice a year.
I do know I will probably get some advice now about qualifying myself more, and I'd like to believe me, but time and $$$ make it less of an attractive choice to me.
Hopefully I will eventually take a carry course or two, and maybe find a comfortable way to carry on my person more regularly, but for right now my thinking is to just make a weapon more available most of the time.
My real question is, I am thinking of complimenting my taurus with 2 ruger lcr's. They seem to be the cheapest option that's also got reliability behind them. I hear a lot of chatter about Taurus being hit or miss in reliability, and about the locking issues on the Smith's.
The other choices would have been a 637 or 642 and some taurus UL series.
Any thoughts/comments about the gun selection for the 1 extra house gun and 1 car/carry gun would be appreciated, before I finally go to gunbroker and spend my $$.
Thanks,
floyd