Defensive Carry banner

1 - 20 of 113 Posts

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
1,892 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
I am not in law Enforcement and didn't stay at a motel last night.

In watching the Mass governor advise people to let the police search the entire town without a warrant had me wondering. Can exigent circumstances exist for the entire town? If you allow the search the rules of in plain sight would apply? Questionable weapon on a bench in your reloading room or 30 round mags sitting on a table. You get the idea.

How far can exigent circumstance go for an entire town?

The supreme court had an interesting decision on the fourth and I wonder how this would go.
https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&...afe&zw&sig=AHIEtbQ7xZXaEOTfBe0a6JYq0wt62Td9WA

Looking forward to opinions.

Respectfully,
Bill
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
6,046 Posts
I rather believe the searches are unconstitutional.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
11,157 Posts
He can ask. The people can tell him to pound dirt.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,607 Posts
Well... I was a police officer. Exigent circumstance exists in this situation. IMO. There is a real, and imminent danger in allowing this perp to run around free. As long as this guy is free he's going to kill people. He's already proven it.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
959 Posts
I would have my domicile locked down like fort knox and not be answering my doors for anyone if I were there. If this trogladyte was in my house he would be a carcass and the cops would not need to search.

Thing is, Cops are generally good people, and right now the least of their worries is a 30 round mag in your house. It wouldn't hold up in court anyways.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
319 Posts
Problem as I see it Fausty is that I don't know what the officers procedural requirements might be. That 30 rd mag is gonna cost me my arm and my leg should the officer decide to write it down in his report. Even being generally good people doesn't mean that his sup or other higher ups won't review his report later. I would, just as you, lock down and not answer my doors.
I've never been a great fan of 'exigency' either. Smacks of totalitarianism if abused.
Hope they get him alive. Sure would be nice to follow-up who's controlling him.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,152 Posts
He can ask. The people can tell him to pound dirt.
Yeah..the only problem though after a "terrorist" attack...is you may end up pounding dirt in Gitmo for obstructing a terrorism investigation... An unfortunate decision we're left with.

Although that brings up an even scarier thought. What are their procedures right now if they knock and get no response?

Suppose you and your dog are in your basement with the idiot tube on or something and don't immediately hear them knocking. Then lets say, they don't get a response and decide to let themselves in to check for said terrorist anyway. Then your dog finally wakes up and notices someone isn't supposed to be there...

This kind of thing has all kinds of ways to go bad.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
234 Posts
Exigent circumstances require a credible belief that some law is being broken and that preservation of evidence, or some other mitigating factor must be noted. Such circumstances cannot exist for an entire town/neighborhood. You cannot believe that one perpetrator is in every house in a given area, and claim exigent circumstances.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
1,892 Posts
Discussion Starter · #10 ·
Thank you all for the response I want the guy caught I just have a bad feeling about no warrant search under Exigent circumstance.

I live very close to a Federal prison and they have a little area for less violent inmates that have very little supervision. We get a walk away about once or twice a year and I wondered if they could force a search.

We don't have anything to hide but you never know what they are looking for or an obscure law you may be breaking.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
301 Posts
I find it amusing that people want him "taken alive". Do you really think law enforcement is going to tell us anything about the interrogation? Best case scenario is they feed us a line of polically correct bs to placate us, then use him to go after bigger fish. Oh and I absolutely would not comply with an illegal search like the one happening right now in Boston.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,761 Posts
How ironic that once they lifted the "don't go outside" ban...... It took a civilian to find the fugitive....... :yup:
 
  • Like
Reactions: tcox4freedom

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
10,046 Posts
He's the deal. Unless they are waving a warrant in your face, you have the right to tell them to go pound sand.

From that point on, it's simply a matter of how bad do they want in, and what amount of force you would like to use in order to repel their entry.

Do you want to use physical or deadly force to keep them out if they are willing to go to that level? Or do you want to let them do their thing, and deal with it in court later on down the road?

One thing is for sure. If you give them permission to do the search, then it you can't claim the unconstitutionality of the search as it was not done by force.

I can tell you that in these kinds of high risk, high threat, dragnets that before they start doing the door-to-doors, the troops are frequently briefed by a prosecutor (or some other high ranking official) and are reminded to stay focused and they are not interested in any ancillary or minor offences which may be encountered during the search. They aren't there for low impact minor B.S and to just find the subject they are looking for.

Now, what does that mean? Not a whole lot of anything when you get right down to it.

So again, unless the have a warrant, you have the right to tell them to take a hike. That is a Constitutionally protected right. After that, it's a matter of how bad they want in, and how bad you want to keep them out.

YMMV
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,607 Posts
A lot of good conversation here. I do support that there are exigent circumstance. Of course the people can deny permission for a search of the personal space. As I posted before the exigent circumstance is the immenant and deadly danger to the community. Exigent circumstance is still subject to judicial review. When searching the officers with or without a warrant can not use the search for a fishing expidition. If the police are searching for a person a 30 round magazine would be inadmissable because the police have no reason to open containers that cound not have the subject of the search contained. In other words the perpetrator couldnt fit into a 30 round magazine... Exigent circumstance cases almost exclusively are connected with the safety of an individual, or a comunity. In the case of evidence being destroyed... my experience is the courts prefer the officers secure the scene, and get a telaphonic warrant.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
15,177 Posts
I believe if you deny them entry and they decide they will search anyway anything illegal they find during the search for the "Fugitive" will be "Spoiled fruit" and will be thrown out of court if it even makes it that far
 

·
Administrator
Joined
·
144,222 Posts
Well, there must have been plenty of citizens who were not home when the door to door search was being done.
AKA some houses were empty because folks were at work...etc.

There was nobody home to open the door and give permission to conduct a search.

If I was home I would have given police permission to search for an unauthorized human being hiding inside my home which would NOT include looking in drawers and inside the dishwasher and the clothes hamper.

In other words I would give them permission to visually search any place an adult human being could possibly hide - like the garage and the closets and under the bed.

But, I heard a quick blurb type insinuation on TV that Police broke into locked up, empty, houses in order to search.

Anybody have an opinion on that? :confused:
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
10,046 Posts
But, I heard a quick blurb type insinuation on TV that Police broke into locked up, empty, houses in order to search.

Anybody have an opinion on that? :confused:
That would be considered a burglary in my book.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
36,326 Posts
How ironic that once they lifted the "don't go outside" ban...... It took a civilian to find the fugitive....... :yup:
Whatever else can be said, it's certainly a good example of a vigilant, aware citizenry.

Now, if we can just get back to having a commonly vigilant, aware and prepared citizenry, one in which everyone is capable of partaking in their own security and defense. Somehow, though, I'll bet most folks will just roll over and go to sleep again, vaguely awaiting the next time when they're roused from sleep. :icon_neutral:
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
37,021 Posts
"Exigent" is a word I have heard only a few times in my life until this week. Now I am hearing it over and over.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
11,157 Posts
Yeah..the only problem though after a "terrorist" attack...is you may end up pounding dirt in Gitmo for obstructing a terrorism investigation... An unfortunate decision we're left with.

Although that brings up an even scarier thought. What are their procedures right now if they knock and get no response?

Suppose you and your dog are in your basement with the idiot tube on or something and don't immediately hear them knocking. Then lets say, they don't get a response and decide to let themselves in to check for said terrorist anyway. Then your dog finally wakes up and notices someone isn't supposed to be there...

This kind of thing has all kinds of ways to go bad.
I do not have to open my door. If they do not have a warrant to search my property, they can go away. Let me put it another way, the city of boston and surrounding areas allowed one man, Yes ONE man to rule there lives for 4 days. If this would have happened in a free state, I have a feeling that a posse would have been formed and our #2 would have been caught sooner.

I watched the capture unfold last night. The police did their job. I am happy for that. What bothered me a bit, were all the sheeple standing around looking lost. In mass. you obviously need someone else to protect you from the bad in the world.
 
1 - 20 of 113 Posts
Top