Defensive Carry banner

1 - 20 of 29 Posts

·
Banned
Joined
·
2,625 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
I own both these holsters. They are for my Glocks 19 and 26 (bought them in 19 size so that they would fit both). I bought both at the same time and at about the same price $65ish but the Midworld, being made to order, had a 1.5 week wait which was very reasonable. For those thinking about getting the Ohio Special or the Double Time, here is a comparo to help you decide.

From the side, the Ohio special is a lot bigger. From the top you can see that while the thicknesses are about the same at the gun area, the Ohio special curves a lot more, conforming to my body.




Putting them on I noticed that even at the top most notch, the Ohio special sat deeper inside my waistband better hiding the handle. The Galco sat higher.

Ohio special


Double Time


The front view showed that the Ohio special pulled closer to my body compared to the Double Time:

Ohio special


Double Time


A few views when under a cover garment...

Side view

Ohio special


Double Time


Bending over at the waist

Ohio special


Double Time


Overall I'm very impressed with the Ohio special. It offered better concealment and felt more comfortable than the Galco. By itself the Galco isn't bad but compared to a custom kydex it feels more off the shelf. Both are great holsters however.

The only thing about the Ohio special is its large body shield, while shielding your gun, can get pretty sticky if worn against bare skin. More kydex = more to stick to your body with. An undergarment will neutralize that.

Hope this helps with your decisions a little! 4.5 stars to the Midworld, 4 stars to the Galco!
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
34,266 Posts
Glad you like the Ohio Special. It was definitely designed with an undergarment in mind. If you bring it up closer to 3:00, the grip will print even less. Also, the front belt loop allows it to be canted even further forward, and deeper. Thanks for the review, and the side-by-side comparison.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
2,625 Posts
Discussion Starter #3
Glad you like the Ohio Special. It was definitely designed with an undergarment in mind. If you bring it up closer to 3:00, the grip will print even less. Also, the front belt loop allows it to be canted even further forward, and deeper. Thanks for the review, and the side-by-side comparison.
Thanks for the suggestion Mike! It was a great buy!
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
2,625 Posts
Discussion Starter #4
Glad you like the Ohio Special. It was definitely designed with an undergarment in mind. If you bring it up closer to 3:00, the grip will print even less. Also, the front belt loop allows it to be canted even further forward, and deeper. Thanks for the review, and the side-by-side comparison.
About the front belt loop, I noticed its different from the rear one. How does it help cant?
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
34,266 Posts
About the front belt loop, I noticed its different from the rear one. How does it help cant?
By looping up over the top instead of being attached directly through the holster, the loop allows the holster to shift slightly when changing positions or if a slightly more forward cant is desired. It is wider than the rear loop because it has more load-bearing responsibility. The rear snap actually carries the rear load of the holster, so a thinner loop works adequately.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,426 Posts
Everyone one wants a small holster. But there is a lot to be said about not going too small IWB. Single clip, you can get away with it. Double clip, you need more distance between them to get a better curve and not have the holster hold the belt off the body so much. It looks like the Galco is actually holding the belt away from the body.

And here is where the holster maker in my kicks in. The Galco does not appear to be made with a real gun, or even a blue gun. The Mid world certainly is. It's also interesting that the retention in the ejection port is completely relieved in the Midworld. Not a big deal at all IWB. I prefer to keep it on my OWB, but it has given me fits on certain guns. So I completely understand the rational for doing away with it. Full sight channel is a nice touch too. I'm alway surprised how many companies don't do that and rely on the gun canting forward on the draw to clear the sights.

Man, I have become a holster nerd.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
116 Posts
The Galco does not appear to be made with a real gun, or even a blue gun. The Mid world certainly is. It's also interesting that the retention in the ejection port is completely relieved in the Midworld. Not a big deal at all IWB. I prefer to keep it on my OWB, but it has given me fits on certain guns. So I completely understand the rational for doing away with it. Full sight channel is a nice touch too. I'm alway surprised how many companies don't do that and rely on the gun canting forward on the draw to clear the sights.

Man, I have become a holster nerd.
The Galco is not actually Kydex at all. It is injection molded, thus the not quite gun look. I relieve the ejection port on all my holsters. I find that I can get more than enough retention without molding into that area. I find that with .080 Kydex, the sharp edge of the ejection port makes a catch point that shaves off Kydex putting grit in the holster. I spend a lot of time masking the dummy guns to avoid catch points. Now, on a hybrid type holster, the leather back flexes enough that it isn't an issue and adds needed retention. The same with leather holsters.

There is nothing wrong with being a holster nerd.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
34,266 Posts
The Galco is not actually Kydex at all. It is injection molded, thus the not quite gun look. I relieve the ejection port on all my holsters. I find that I can get more than enough retention without molding into that area. I find that with .080 Kydex, the sharp edge of the ejection port makes a catch point that shaves off Kydex putting grit in the holster. I spend a lot of time masking the dummy guns to avoid catch points. Now, on a hybrid type holster, the leather back flexes enough that it isn't an issue and adds needed retention. The same with leather holsters.

There is nothing wrong with being a holster nerd.
I never started out intending to be a holster nerd, but then...
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,426 Posts
Yeah, I attacked the issue from a different angle. I've actually modified some of my blue guns with plumbers putty to relieve the retention and issues with the ejection port. But it leaves enough there to see the port. Your fix looks good though.

I've also seen where some guys are making dummy gun patterns out of wood. Personally, I like the custom look from a real gun or blue gun as opposed to the generic gun look.

I've embraced my inner nerd.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
116 Posts
Yeah, I attacked the issue from a different angle. I've actually modified some of my blue guns with plumbers putty to relieve the retention and issues with the ejection port. But it leaves enough there to see the port. Your fix looks good though.

I've also seen where some guys are making dummy gun patterns out of wood. Personally, I like the custom look from a real gun or blue gun as opposed to the generic gun look.

I've embraced my inner nerd.
In the past I played with using putty and various other fillers to get the port "just right". It works pretty well, but I use those craft sticks for a lot of other masking jobs so they are on the bench anyway, so I figured I would just use them. They are fast and allow me to make them all the same.

I have thought about just using bondo to fill in the port on the dummy guns, bet decided that because I would have to use the sticks on real guns anyway I might as well just go with the sticks and keep my products all looking the same.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
34,266 Posts
In the past I played with using putty and various other fillers to get the port "just right". It works pretty well, but I use those craft sticks for a lot of other masking jobs so they are on the bench anyway, so I figured I would just use them. They are fast and allow me to make them all the same.

I have thought about just using bondo to fill in the port on the dummy guns, bet decided that because I would have to use the sticks on real guns anyway I might as well just go with the sticks and keep my products all looking the same.
I've had holsters made both ways, and definitely prefer the craft sticks. I worry much more about retention and the elimination of binding at sharp edges than detailed molding.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
143 Posts
Can't wait to receive my Ohio Special. I am checking the mail every day with the anticipation of a kid at Christmas! Come on holster, hurry up & get here!
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
2,625 Posts
Discussion Starter #18 (Edited)
After a whole week of using my Ohio special, I'm completely sold on it now. It is the best and most comfortable holster in my drawer bar none! I am going to sell my Galco because I grab this 100% of the time now. Wonderful product!
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
34,266 Posts
After a whole week of using my Ohio special, I'm completely sold on it now. It is the best and most comfortable holster in my drawer bar none! I am going to sell my Galco now because I grab this 100% of the time now. Wonderful product!
I know exactly how you feel. I'm very glad it is working out so well for you.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
859 Posts
The execution of both is v good, in areas such as angle and clearance of the pistol controls. From your pics the Midworld version is v, v wide for what it does, and one wonders why that rear belt loop is wandering out from the body a bit.

In both cases, ideally the holstered pistol would go into the pants until your knuckle just clears the belt; which neither does in your pics. There's no good reason to have the pistol higher than that, and the negatives of being higher are that it's a bit harder to hide, a bit more effort to draw, a bit less comfortable to wear. These three all add up, though hopefully you would draw rarely :)

With those areas fixed up, likely you'd want to give them 5 stars!
 
1 - 20 of 29 Posts
Top