OK, the title is mis-leading. The government didn't take it over. They sent a request/demand and the owner complied. Big, big difference.
Government Takes Over Wiki Weapons Website
Feds scrub 3D gun plans from Internet, designer says | Fox News
Government takeover of a private website because it has plans for printing guns on 3-D printers... your thoughts?
Government takeover of a private website because it has plans for printing guns on 3-D printers... your thoughts?
1 - 20 of 26 Posts
I'm sure the government made some serious threats to intimidate the owner.OK, the title is mis-leading. The government didn't take it over. They sent a request/demand and the owner complied. Big, big difference.
From the article:OK, the title is mis-leading. The government didn't take it over. They sent a request/demand and the owner complied. Big, big difference.
"Until further notice, the United States government claims control of the information.”
"They asked that I take it down while they determine if they have the authority to control the info,"."
My Response :
I guess you are right, but the government "Claimed control of the information." I guess I should have said, "Government takes over information on website." I see little difference
Let me punch you in the face, until I determine if I have the authority to do so."They asked that I take it down while they determine if they have the authority to control the info,"
This is crap anyway you look at it.
You don't; now stop . . . please. :boxing: :vollkommenauf:Let me punch you in the face, until I determine if I have the authority to do so.
I should clarify myself. I don't think it's right. It's the difference between a cop showing up at your door and asking you to turn over your guns vs. a SWAT team breaking down your door and taking them.From the article:
"Until further notice, the United States government claims control of the information.”
"They asked that I take it down while they determine if they have the authority to control the info,"."
My Response :
I guess you are right, but the government "Claimed control of the information." I guess I should have said, "Government takes over information on website." I see little difference
Shouldn't be surprising. The government does that sorta thing all the time. "I'm going to tell you to do x while I figure out if I can make you do x"
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
I wonder if Cody Wilson can print 3D policemen; Senator Feinstein can distribute them to protect people in CA from pit bulls. After all, California can't afford real policemen, they have gone broke providing government services to "undocumented" (see how I am being PC by not calling them illegal aliens) aliens.
"We've got to hurry up and pass this law, so we can find out what's in it!"Shouldn't be surprising. The government does that sorta thing all the time. "I'm going to tell you to do x while I figure out if I can make you do x"
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
When does the Government request....... they more or less Demand... (I'm still waiting on the IRS for a PLEASE & THANK YOU).OK, the title is mis-leading. The government didn't take it over. They sent a request/demand and the owner complied. Big, big difference.
Why do i carry a weapon........Because a policeman is too heavy.
Why do i need Hi-Capacity magazines....You try killing a Zombie on just ten rounds.
Why do i need Hi-Capacity magazines....You try killing a Zombie on just ten rounds.
Isn't it still legal (federally, at least) to build your own firearm without a license, as long as you don't sell it?
As far as I know, that is what 80% receivers are all about.
Yes its still legal for the moment. Problem is, he has taken all of the machining out of the equation. Now anyone can build one. That has the gubment scared....Isn't it still legal (federally, at least) to build your own firearm without a license, as long as you don't sell it?
This is the age of Obama and Holder they can do what ever they want no laws or Constitution apply to them.
More to come count on it
More to come count on it
Isn't it time the "gubment" got scared? Instead of "we the people"?Yes its still legal for the moment. Problem is, he has taken all of the machining out of the equation. Now anyone can build one. That has the gubment scared....
They're already to late the plans have been downloaded innumerable time and have been socked away in torrents for anyone to get. Once it's on the net it stays on the net. Shutting down one site doesn't mean as much nowadays. The cats out of the bag, the horse has left the stable, the milks already been spilled, and the S has already HTF. The Government is just scrambling to make it look like they can do something about it.
It would seem like the gov. would deal with undocumented aliens with as much enthusiasm as they have for undocumented liquor.
1 - 20 of 26 Posts
- This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Defensive Carry
A forum community dedicated to defensive firearm owners and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about everyday carry, optics, holsters, gunsmithing, styles, reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more!
Full Forum Listing
