1 Samuel Chapter 17
+1. Point of impact is everything.1 Samuel Chapter 17
Bet you scare women away when you put that in your SmartCarry. :scratchchin:Uhhhhh no, at least not while carrying this one. :rofl:
Seriously that is something I remind myself about all the time. Granted most of my "carry hours" are with a LCP which is better than nothing, but can definitely be inadequate. However, I do a good job ramping up to a more appropriate gun when I feel necessary and I do it for the very reason's in your OP.
I too have experienced that last minute, I wish-I-had-a-bigger-gun thought. :comeandgetsome:
Had a guy on parole supervision. He was 6'7" and well over 400 lbs. He went to jail to begin with because he fought 10+ cops by himself and was winning win a fluke stopped the fight. He is schizophrenic and bipolar. He is harmless as a one winged gnat when on his meds. But when off he was pretty much indestructible. I called him Juggernaut, like the X-men Character. It was so bad, that his house was on the line of two jurisdictions, and the LEO agencies would both respond to disturbances at the house and then call dispatch and argue over which side of the house he was in. All so they wouldnt have to deal with him on the call. With that in mnd, I was a parole officer charged with going to his house by MYSELF on random basis, "unarmed". I often wondered if my .40 G23 I didnt carry would have stopped him when necessary. I definitely feel what Biker is getting at.
Interesting. Was caliber the only difference in this case? Or were the .45’s FMJ while the 9mm and .40’s were JHPs?Yes, I have, but for a slightly different reasons. I'm not worried about being able to put down a human or dog.
I chose to carry a 45 at work for one simple reason; It tears the heck out of cars and gets to the occupants. Sounds goofy, but its the truth. Most of the LEO shootings I've seen first hand had vehicles involved. I wanted to be sure I could punch through windows or sheet metal with ease. A few summers ago I was involved in a shooting with several officers. I got to see the difference in with a 9mm, 40 and 45 going through a modern Chevy. All but the 45's were stopped by the car, 5 of the 7 45acp found there target and did the job.
Most of the test I have seen were no very scientific or complete, and none could replicate real world factors. But that is besides the point.Interesting. Was caliber the only difference in this case? Or were the .45’s FMJ while the 9mm and .40’s were JHPs?
Just curious, as every test I’ve seen showed that modern cars are poor cover against most modern pistol cartridges.
You know, when you look at the ft/lbs of energy. a hot 9mm compares nicely to a .45. Same for the ballistic gel.Yes, I have, but for a slightly different reasons. I'm not worried about being able to put down a human or dog.
I chose to carry a 45 at work for one simple reason; It tears the heck out of cars and gets to the occupants. Sounds goofy, but its the truth. Most of the LEO shootings I've seen first hand had vehicles involved. I wanted to be sure I could punch through windows or sheet metal with ease. A few summers ago I was involved in a shooting with several officers. I got to see the difference in with a 9mm, 40 and 45 going through a modern Chevy. All but the 45's were stopped by the car, 5 of the 7 45acp found there target and did the job.