Gun Myths
1 - 13 of 13 Posts
Joined
·
25,481 Posts
Actually Randy - tho it was one I'd seen - it was well worth a rerun - and far as I am concerned it shows some inescapable logic.
But then we utilize logic instead of gut emotion.
Al Sharpton - ''state of terror'' - yeah right
- ''rivers of blood too huh?"
Be good to have more of this sort of exposure anytime - get some sense into some heads - just perhaps.
But then we utilize logic instead of gut emotion.
Al Sharpton - ''state of terror'' - yeah right
- ''rivers of blood too huh?"Be good to have more of this sort of exposure anytime - get some sense into some heads - just perhaps.
Yeah, see it's not really a "pro gun" piece at all! It's just a direct side to side comparison.
Here we see what the Brady Bunch has to say.
But here is what the data we have tells us and it doesn't agree with the Brady Bunch. In fact it seems to contradict them.
That's the whole thing in a nutshell. Nowhere in the piece do they say who is right or wrong, nowhere do they say you should or should not have a gun. They just show what some people say and what some people experienced. It's all factual.
Of course the right side wins when you compare it logically like that, but I didn't see that as the intention of the reporter. He's just saying "Look people what you're being told doesn't add up..."
Like I said it blows my mind. It's a neutral segment based on facts. I reitireate, how did this ever get on television?
Here we see what the Brady Bunch has to say.
But here is what the data we have tells us and it doesn't agree with the Brady Bunch. In fact it seems to contradict them.
That's the whole thing in a nutshell. Nowhere in the piece do they say who is right or wrong, nowhere do they say you should or should not have a gun. They just show what some people say and what some people experienced. It's all factual.
Of course the right side wins when you compare it logically like that, but I didn't see that as the intention of the reporter. He's just saying "Look people what you're being told doesn't add up..."
Like I said it blows my mind. It's a neutral segment based on facts. I reitireate, how did this ever get on television?
Joined
·
749 Posts
I love that piece, I wonder if it actually echoes the reporters feelings or not. If so, he would be a great spokesman for a gun rights organization.
Joined
·
835 Posts
ABCNews 'fair and balanced'? You gotta be kidding me.
This one balanced, not really pro, report on defensive gun use hardly counters the hundreds of anti freedom position pieces they air anually.
Not a bad report, but it hardly makes up for the damage they've done. I won't be watching ABC News any time soon.
This one balanced, not really pro, report on defensive gun use hardly counters the hundreds of anti freedom position pieces they air anually.
Not a bad report, but it hardly makes up for the damage they've done. I won't be watching ABC News any time soon.
1 - 13 of 13 Posts
Join the discussion
