Defensive Carry banner

1 - 20 of 30 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,091 Posts
Discussion Starter #1 (Edited)

·
Banned
Joined
·
693 Posts
I've seen this debated for over 20 years.

The truth of the matter is that if you're wandering around in condition white, I can pick you out of a crowd from a block away and jump you.

If you have the unfortunate luck of trying to attack my friends (particularly those with an IPSC background) who are aware of changing circumstances and watch people and events closely, well then, you'll be shot as you make the first step of your attack.

I've come to the decision, which is old I realize, that it ain't the hardware, it's the man. When you are close enough to see him, he can see you. Make sure any ambush has an escape route. Don't buy your advice on defense from an ad in a gun magazine, and practice, practice, practice.

Trust me, broken bones are a pain in the whazoo.
 

·
1952 - 2006
Joined
·
1,371 Posts
The Tourist said:
I've seen this debated for over 20 years.

The truth of the matter is that if you're wandering around in condition white, I can pick you out of a crowd from a block away and jump you.

If you have the unfortunate luck of trying to attack my friends (particularly those with an IPSC background) who are aware of changing circumstances and watch people and events closely, well then, you'll be shot as you make the first step of your attack.

I've come to the decision, which is old I realize, that it ain't the hardware, it's the man. When you are close enough to see him, he can see you. Make sure any ambush has an escape route. Don't buy your advice on defense from an ad in a gun magazine, and practice, practice, practice.

Trust me, broken bones are a pain in the whazoo.
In my opinion you have missed the point of the article.
Even if you are able to draw and shoot the BG with the knife, he is still going to cut you by way of his momentum. Even if you are able to shoot him it will take several seconds (Up to 15 to 30 seconds) for your shot(s) to incapacitate him.
You have to move out of his path and deflect the momentum of his attack.
His attack will come when he IS only a step away from you and as stated in the article, no one survives this kind of "close encounter."
Staying aware and in "Condition Orange" will help you to avoid getting cut, but it may not stop it from happening.
The best choice as the article states is to deflect the momentum away from you, in the opposite direction, then initiate the use of your firearm.

All of the people in this "test" were aware an attack was imminent and still they lost. On the street as a civilian carrying a CCW you won't have that advantage. Unless you have been trained for a "conditioned response" through years of training and conditioning you are going to lose, because the BG's aren't going to be courteous enough to announce their intentions until they are ready to attack and they have the advantage.

But you are right on one point in particular. PRACTICE, PRACTICE, PRACTICE.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
17,352 Posts
We had a case in CCW class whre a officer talked about shooting a guy with a knife and still getting stabbed by the momentum..

They were dealing with another criminal when this guy screams at up and starts running witha butcher knife total unrelated to teh first guy ..

The officer shot him at around 19 feet teh first round and put a few more in and still got cut in the arm not severly but still.
 

·
Super Moderator
Joined
·
25,574 Posts
I seem to recall reading someplace that in situations like this a low shot is better. Instead of aiming center mass, shoot low and disrupt the pelvic area. This provides an almost instant drop.

Just food for thought.
 

·
Super Moderator
Joined
·
19,009 Posts
From LEO training I was taught and showed . You can draw and fire on someone only outside the 21 ft. zone. This is from a duty holster, ready for the attack and the attacker is running at ya. How many attacks are gonna start 21 ft. away and/ or get your attention. Most knife and other attacks are gonna start MUCH closer. Better to learn to shoot , draw , fight from the ground and to block or react as you draw. I.E. get out of the way or use cover first. Don't believe it? Get a fake knife and unload yer gun. BE SURE ITS UNLOADED. Get a friend to charge ya from 21 ft. and see what happens.
 

·
Administrator
Joined
·
143,955 Posts
Do The Test.

Be extremely careful (of course) ~ CHECK & Recheck your firearm.
You don't even need a fake knife.
Have somebody run at you with a carrot from 21' away & right after you do that test would be a really good time to ask yourself if you really want your defensive firearm secreted way down inside your pants and keeping your jingleberries company. :rolleyes:

rocky said:
From LEO training I was taught and showed . You can draw and fire on someone only outside the 21 ft. zone. This is from a duty holster, ready for the attack and the attacker is running at ya. How many attacks are gonna start 21 ft. away and/ or get your attention. Most knife and other attacks are gonna start MUCH closer. Better to learn to shoot , draw , fight from the ground and to block or react as you draw. I.E. get out of the way or use cover first. Don't believe it? Get a fake knife and unload yer gun. BE SURE ITS UNLOADED. Get a friend to charge ya from 21 ft. and see what happens.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
693 Posts
Your appraisal of a threat should start at more than 21 feet. If a guy is hinkie in a parking lot over 100 yards away you should THEN begin your safety actions and move from yellow to orange. This is precisely because people with guns DO get cut even after a round/rounds are fired.

I train Mozambique. With practice, practice, practice he should be easy to side-step. He'll be dead.

Use your brain. Watch your surroundings before 21 feet ever comes up. 'Avoidance' is part of self defense, as well.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
91 Posts
Please note the following discussion of pelvic shots by Dr. Fackler in--Fackler ML: "Shots to the Pelvic Area ". Wound Ballistics Review. 4(1):13; 1999.
“I welcome the chance to refute the belief that the pelvic area is a reasonable target during a gunfight. I can find no evidence or valid rationale for intentionally targeting the pelvic area in a gunfight. The reasons against, however, are many. They include:

-- From the belt line to the top of the head, the areas most likely to rapidly incapacitate the person hit are concentrated in or near the midline. In the pelvis, however, the blood vessels are located to each side, having diverged from the midline, as the aorta and inferior vena cava divide at about the level of the navel. Additionally, the target that, when struck, is the most likely to cause rapid and reliable incapacitation, the spinal cord located in the midline of the abdomen, thorax and neck), ends well above the navel and 18 not a target in the pelvis.
-- The pelvic branches of the aorta and inferior vena cava are more difficult to hit than their parent vessels -- they are smaller targets, and they diverge laterally from the midline (getting farther from it as they descend). Even if hit, each carry far less blood than the larger vessels from which they originated. Thus, even if one of these branches in the pelvis is hit, incapacitation from blood loss must necessarily be slower than from a major vessel hit higher up in the torso.
-- Other than soft tissue structures not essential to continuing the gunfight (1oops of bowel, bladder) the most likely thing to be struck by shots to the pelvis would be bone. The ilium is a large flat bone that forms most of the back wall of the pelvis. The problem is that handgun bullets that hit it would not break the bone but only make a small hole in passing through it: this would do nothing to destroy bony support of the pelvic girdle. The pelvic girdle is essentially a circle: to disrupt its structure significantly would require breaking it in two places. Only a shot that disrupted the neck or upper portion of the shaft of the femur would be likely to disrupt bony support enough to cause the person hit to fall. This is a small and highly unlikely target: the aim point to hit it would be a mystery to those without medical training — and to most of those with medical training.

The “theory” stated in the question postulates that “certain autonomic responses the body undergoes during periods of stress” causes officers to shoot low, and that apparently this is good in a gunfight because such shots cause “severe disability.” I hope that the points presented above debunk the second part of the theory. As for the “autonomic responses” that cause officers to shoot low, I am unaware of anything in the anatomy or physiology of the autonomic nervous system that would even suggest such an occurrence. Most laymen do not understand the function of the autonomic nervous system. It is simply a system whose main function is to fine tune the glands and smooth muscles (those in the walls of organs and blood vessels) of the body. During times of stress such as perceived impending danger, the autonomic nervous system diverts blood from the intestines and digestive organs to the skeletal muscles — in the so-called “fight or flight” response. The effects of this response are constantly exaggerated by laymen who lack an adequate understanding of it — most notably by gun writ-ers eager to impress their readers. Interestingly, the human body can get along quite well without major parts of the autonomic nervous system. During my professional life as a surgeon, myself and colleagues removed parts of thousands of vagus nerves (mostly in treating peptic ulcer disease) -- thus depriving the patient of the major part of the parasympathetic half of the autonomic nervous system. We also removed many ganglia from the sympathetic half of the auto-nomic nervous system, in treating such things as profusely excess sweating and various problems caused by spasm of the arteries. I am unaware of any evidence that these operations produced any significant effect on the future capacity of these patients to react appropriately in times of impending danger.

Unfortunately, the pelvis shot fallacy is common. This fallacy, along with other misinformation, is promoted constantly by at least one gun writer who is widely published in the popular gun press. Because of this, I regularly debunk this fallacy by including some of the above rationale in my presentations to law enforcement firearm instructor groups.”


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------
 

·
Super Moderator
Joined
·
25,574 Posts
FLM said:
Please note the following discussion of pelvic shots by Dr. Fackler in--Fackler ML: "Shots to the Pelvic Area ". Wound Ballistics Review. 4(1):13; 1999.
“I welcome the chance to refute the belief that the pelvic area is a reasonable target during a gunfight. I can find no evidence or valid rationale for intentionally targeting the pelvic area in a gunfight. The reasons against, however, are many.
Cool, I stand corrected! Now that what these forums are about!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
742 Posts
Fackler

Nothing wrong with pelvic shots despite what Fackler says. I like the zipper myself. Pelvic shots will anchor better than lung shots. How much of the upper torso is lungs?

21' if you are not wide awake, you will not get a shot off if you stand still. Moving off of the line of attack, getting something between you and the attacker, will give you time.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,091 Posts
Discussion Starter #12
I am sorry you think this will be easy. I hope you never get caught in just such a situation. I hope you have the ability to pick up a threat from a ways off. But you have to be right 100% of the time, the BG needs to be right only once. I have seen diversionary tactics where skilled law enforcement officers where totally caught off guard. On that note, even law enforcement who do not have to draw from concealment still get beat to the punch.

I was just trying to pass on some info.

~A

The Tourist said:
Your appraisal of a threat should start at more than 21 feet. If a guy is hinkie in a parking lot over 100 yards away you should THEN begin your safety actions and move from yellow to orange. This is precisely because people with guns DO get cut even after a round/rounds are fired.

I train Mozambique. With practice, practice, practice he should be easy to side-step. He'll be dead.

Use your brain. Watch your surroundings before 21 feet ever comes up. 'Avoidance' is part of self defense, as well.
 

·
Super Moderator
Joined
·
19,009 Posts
APachon said:
I am sorry you think this will be easy. I hope you never get caught in just such a situation. I hope you have the ability to pick up a threat from a ways off. But you have to be right 100% of the time, the BG needs to be right only once. I have seen diversionary tactics where skilled law enforcement officers where totally caught off guard. On that note, even law enforcement who do not have to draw from concealment still get beat to the punch.

I was just trying to pass on some info.

~A
I agree. You cannot be alert and ready for everything , all the time. Hell an attack can come from behind, or while some other distraction has your attention.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
940 Posts
And that 21 foot drill is only an average - I've trained with folks that can cover that so fast that the first retention strap isn't even off before they're pegged the target.

It's especially true against taller folks with long limbs - you can cut a third of that distance off if they have large strides or long arms. If they have both, god help you.

And despite our best efforts, nobody is 100% aware 100% of the time. It just doesn't happen unless you're on GlockTalk.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
20,044 Posts
rfurtkamp said:
And despite our best efforts, nobody is 100% aware 100% of the time. It just doesn't happen unless you're on GlockTalk.
:34: LOL, geez I hope I never see people posting stuff like that about us ....
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,020 Posts
Folks, have any of you ever seen a video called SURVIVING EDGED WEAPONS? It's no longer available (IIRC), but it was a certified police training video shot by some PD in Minnesota I think. Anyway, it was subpoenable in case you had to shoot in a knife situation because of it's status as being used to train LEOs. I learned from that and from many other examples that I myself am not capable of making the draw even out to thirty feet or more. Not when I'm the target and the perp is on the move at a solid run. Therefore I train to go into hand to hand with the full knowledge that I'm probably going to get "cut" but also that I'll be able to control the situation. In Aikido, the closer the opponent is, the better it is for the defender. Much better if he's moving fast. I'm no black belt and have no desire to be. Only competent.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
742 Posts
Calibre press did the video I think. Been using it in training for many years. It is pretty well done and has been used in court several times.
 

·
Super Moderator
Joined
·
18,125 Posts
We trained on a knife scenario just the other day at the S.O. The scenario was this...

You pull over a vehicle for an equipment violation. As you walk up to the vehicle to request the DL,registration and proof of insurance the door on the vehicle opens and the driver advances upon you with a knife.

Average range is 1 and a half car lengths...the minimum distance that you need to stop when pulling over a vehicle.

In each and every case the officer got "cut". This was proved with a rubber knife that was chalked upon the edges. Officers were using a modified Glock, modified with a "Simuniton" barrel and shooting Simuntion paintballs.

Several officers with enlarged egos were humbled that night.It was good training and much was learned. Every scenario was replayed several times, and just to keep it interesting, and somewhat realistic, at random times the driver of the vehicle would advance with nothing more than a cell phone or set of keys or in a few situations a small maglight.

Now here is the kicker...

Every officer was AWARE that SOMETHING was gonna happen. We didnt know exactly what, but our senses were somewhat alert, more so than average.
Even so, it seemed to matter little. In most cases, guns never cleared leather and for those that did, most shots were hits in the legs and feet. One rather comical looking but somewhat effective tactic occured when one of the officers backed up and fell on his back. He put his feet up while drawing from his holster and shot the "perp" several times. He also shot his right foot once and both legs took multiple cuts but it was felt that these would have been survivable. When he argued that the "perp" never cut his legs, he only had to look down to see the chalk marking all over his Levi's.

We've had several "man with a knife" calls lately, and this had sparked a bit of training in this area. You automaticly draw your gun if you see someone with a knife as you may not have time otherwise. Anybody stupid enough to continue holding a knife when told by armed officers pointing guns at them to drop the knife, is stupid enough to try to use it.

And in the car scenario with the knife...
If somebody wants your ass, it aint gonna matter how good you are or how good you think you are, they are goin to have it and there aint much you can do about it...
 
1 - 20 of 30 Posts
Top