So, I want to be sure I got this right...
We can discuss the relative pros and cons of Glocks, Sigs, XDs, M&Ps, Rugers, Berettas, etc here on DC...but not Kahrs?
Folks can report their personal experiences, both good and bad, with various manufacturers...except for Kahr?
We can have lively discussions about all these brands, even friendly disagreements...but anyone who dares post a question or an experience that could be seen as negative about Kahr is a "troll," a "basher," or someone whose reported issues could be explained away by "operator error?"
I suppose the results of the reliability poll were just an anomaly?
http://www.defensivecarry.com/vbull...guns/83995-handgun-reliability-poll-kahr.html
As much as some of you like to defend Kahr, I'm starting to wonder if you are moles that work for them!:tongue::smile:
The OP should probably have just done a search - this topic has been discussed repeatedly. But really folks, this is a public forum, and as long as folks obey the forum rules, you can't complain just because you disagree with others' opinions, or don't like the facts they present.
I don't get bent out of shape when folks criticize Glocks for things a lot less serious than dropping magazines and peening slides and barrels. :embarassed: Stop trying to kill the messengers, OK?
There are new folks here all the time, who are honestly trying to learn as much as they can, in order to make an informed decision. Others might be trying to figure out why issues they experienced happened, and what to do about them. Nothing wrong with that. We're all adults here - folks can digest all the facts and opinions and make their own decisions.
Chill out, don't take it personally, and give folks the benefit of the doubt. Cool?:bier: