The only way is to keep the gun grabbers out of office in the first place.
And how do you propose we do that?? With all this talk of her pretty much already being our next president even before the election, what if she does make it in there? Then what? Your proposal to keep gun grabbers out of office was about as effective as a fart in a windstorm. Lol.The only way is to keep the gun grabbers out of office in the first place.
When you have freedom, you'll have those who will abuse it. Nothing you can do to stop it other than to restrict everyone's rights.Hopefully this won't cause an uproar but, what do all of you think would be a reasonable solution to go about this whole gun control debate and protect gun rights from the gun grabbers yet at the same time minimizing gun violence?
With all these shootings, it's like in one way you can't blame them for wanting stricter gun laws. But, as we all know, too many people want to go about things like this completely the wrong way with the wrong attitude.
I want to keep my gun rights. I want all of you other good and decent people out there to keep yours as well.
How do we do this yet, at the same time, keep Hilliary and all her supporters from trying to take our guns and not listening to the logic that only law abiding citizens follow laws and that criminals do not?
There has to be a solution other than just banning guns altogether.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sooo, kinda like in early grade school, if one student steals the chalkboard eraser...... When teacher asked who did it, and no one fesses up, the whole class suffers getting to sit in their seats quietly while the rest of the classes go to the playground for recess?When you have freedom, you'll have those who will abuse it. Nothing you can do to stop it other than to restrict everyone's rights.
Drunk driving deaths per year have been reduced by over fifty percent since 1982, all without banning or restricting ownership of motor vehicles. Instead, the efforts have been directed at the drunks doing the driving. Maybe if a similar approach was adopted by going after people who commit crimes with guns...Hopefully this won't cause an uproar but, what do all of you think would be a reasonable solution to go about this whole gun control debate and protect gun rights from the gun grabbers yet at the same time minimizing gun violence?
With all these shootings, it's like in one way you can't blame them for wanting stricter gun laws. But, as we all know, too many people want to go about things like this completely the wrong way with the wrong attitude.
I want to keep my gun rights. I want all of you other good and decent people out there to keep yours as well.
How do we do this yet, at the same time, keep Hilliary and all her supporters from trying to take our guns and not listening to the logic that only law abiding citizens follow laws and that criminals do not?
There has to be a solution other than just banning guns altogether.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
There will never be a way to eliminate violence without taking rights away and that is the problem....Too many people who think they know what is best for someone else is the problem.
There's gotta be some that just don't want another Orlando to happen again but yes, I think the majority of them think just as you said, 9B.OP, it's a good point to ponder; however, I have come to realize that unfortunately, the anti's really don't want to find a "happy medium"...actually they don't want anyone except the police to have guns.
I'm not going to get into that because that's not what the discussion is about. Talking about what classifies as infringement and what doesn't is too much like talking politics or religion. It's just someone's beliefs over someone else's.The second Amendment states, "Shall not be infringed". We have already allowed more than enough infringement. It does not say , "Forever there shall be compromise until guns no longer exist."
I agree. Just like in Texas. If you're gay and don't like Texas laws regarding it, don't live there. Move to a more "gay friendly" state. There's plenty of them. lol.The best solution for the Anti's, there are many lands around the world that are gun free, move.
There are a couple problems with "just move". One, it simply isn't an economic possibility for most. If it were, the inner city ghettos would be completely abandoned.I agree. Just like in Texas. If you're gay and don't like Texas laws regarding it, don't live there. Move to a more "gay friendly" state. There's plenty of them. lol.
It's just too bad that a firearm is regarded the most effective tool over a rock, knife, car, ect ect.IMHO: If there was NEVER any firearms, people would kill people with other items; knife, sword, broken beer bottle, hammer, run over with a vehicle, blow them up, etc........
A firearm is just one item.....of many ways to intimidate, kill or wound another.
I don't believe the gun grabbers just want to have just "gun control" they want Australia or the UK style of full firearm confiscation.
First off, that background check information when you buy a gun is only temporarily available information from what I was told. In other words, the only way to be able to do what you said in in the first part of the quote that this paragraph is in response to was if you actually register your gun. Second, the only reason the gun dealer records that information is just so that if that gun they sold you ever ends up at a crime scene, that's just one more page in the paper trail that the FBI will follow and move on.Universal Background Checks is one way by getting the purchasers name, address, type of weapon, serial number, caliber, etc. so at the appropriate time, they can send the "authorities" to your home and relieve you of your firearm(s).
Guess I never did hear about that.Look at what they did in New Orleans when Katrina came......From what I understand, a majority of those weapons have yet to be returned to the rightful owners.
The solution to not banning guns altogether is to protect the 2nd Amendment. You are asking for solutions on how to meet half way. Which allows infringement. Infringement is not politics or beliefs. The 2A is not politics or beliefs.I'm not going to get into that because that's not what the discussion is about. Talking about what classifies as infringement and what doesn't is too much like talking politics or religion. It's just someone's beliefs over someone else's.
I agree. Just like in Texas. If you're gay and don't like Texas laws regarding it, don't live there. Move to a more "gay friendly" state. There's plenty of them. lol.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk