Joined
·
131 Posts
When I Google that question, this is at the top of the list:
Unconstitutional Official Acts
It pops up all the time, and it seems reasonable.
Just for the sake of discussion:
Reading that document leads me to believe that I would be breaking no laws if I were to carry a loaded weapon in Illinois right now.
It would seem that no judge could convict you of breaking a law that is really no law at all, in fact, the judge would be in trouble if he/she did.
The 180 day stay is pretty much meaningless. Unconstitutional is unconstitutional from when the "law" was enacted, not when it was deemed
unconstitutional.
Someone in Chicago is going try to use that defense:
Concealed carry ban at center of Chicago man's weapons case - chicagotribune.com
Gerry
Unconstitutional Official Acts
It pops up all the time, and it seems reasonable.
Just for the sake of discussion:
Reading that document leads me to believe that I would be breaking no laws if I were to carry a loaded weapon in Illinois right now.
It would seem that no judge could convict you of breaking a law that is really no law at all, in fact, the judge would be in trouble if he/she did.
The 180 day stay is pretty much meaningless. Unconstitutional is unconstitutional from when the "law" was enacted, not when it was deemed
unconstitutional.
Someone in Chicago is going try to use that defense:
Concealed carry ban at center of Chicago man's weapons case - chicagotribune.com
Gerry