Para vs H&K
I'm right now considering the choice of either a USP (H&K) or a PO TAC-4. I'm leaning to the USP because Para seems to have a spotty record of quality control. But that danged TAC-4 just feels soooooo good in my grasp! At 13+1 rds it's hard to beat and I'm specifically looking for a hi-cap 45. I'm just a teeeensy bit worried about whether or not that LDA action is durable enough and their mags all seem to have spring issues....ALL of them! LOL Or so it seems. Some folks over at the 1911 forum have had nightmarish encounters with the PO Customer Service folks. OTOH, the H&K quality control is second to none. But I sorta don't like the raspy feel of the grip and it seems kinda big for my medium sized hands considering it's a 12 rd magazine. So I'm still considering the matter. I have a Sig Sauer P245 that I just love but I don't like the six rd capacity nor the upgraded 8rd capacity with the P220 mags that stick out a bit. But the gun is awesome. VERY rugged.d2thomas said:I was considering purchasing this real nice Paraord 45 LDA. I was initially turned on by the hammer design coupled the very thought of light double action. Give me some opinions on this gun, anyone own one? carry one? I currently carry a double action gun so it's not like going from carrying a 1911 to a DAO gun...