[MJB_17]

Simple question, agree to a magazine capacity limit of 30 rounds for all handguns, rifles, and shotguns not otherwise currently regulated under the NFA in exchange for national reciprocity of all firearms carry permits with a complete prohibition on state and local preemption?

Yes?

No?

 

[Rock and Glock]

NO! I will not horse-trade a darn thing. Particularly for national reciprocity ("NR").

1) They have no right to limit mag sizes and limits make no sense anyway;
2) They can steal back anything they want, including NR;
3) NR is a pipe-dream in this day and age;
4) RTC is a state matter; and
5) They are NOT to be trusted

 

[65108]

You mean take power away from the states while simultaneously removing rights from the people? Yeah, that sounds like a great idea. :slap:

 

[ccw9mm]

NO! I will not horse-trade a darn thing.

Absolutely my take on things.

The "cold, dead fingers" are getting "colder" by the day.

 

[jblives2ride]

I have a Texas CHL it's good for anywhere I'm going to travel.. I don't need to goto the east or west coast...

 

[msgt/ret]

The anti’s idea of compromise is they get what they want and we get nothing in exchange.

 

[boscobeans]

No. As of April 15th we will have a SEVEN round magazine limit in NYS...
We are fighting it like hell and hope Cuomobama's law gets thrown out...Several law suits filed already.
bosco

 

[Rbloodhound]

No. My permit is good where I travel. If its not valid I don't need to spend my $ there.

 

[OD*]

Absolutely not.

 

[gregnsc]

No and one thing,i can't get an answer for, from any anti.I'm speaking of just me obviously.The worst thing,i have ever been charged for,was a rolling stop at a stop sign,and my dumb self had let my d.l. expire.Yep i went brain dead.So,i want an anti to explain to me,if i want a 100rd mag,what have i done,for someone to say no?.If i want to travel to where ever,same question.Obviously,that goes for any law abiding citizen.I don't ask anymore.Waste of my time.

 

[GraySkies]

By doing this you would be (by default) ceding to the federal government the right to regulate magazine sizes and concealed carry, which is now treated (rightly or wrongly) as a state right.

The problem here is NOT too little federal involvement (it almost never is). Any federal preemption of any area they don't already control now will be a catastrophic movement in the wrong direction.

Allowing decisions about abridging our rights to be more insulated from the population directly effected by that abridgement (ANYTHING federal) is almost always a bad move. Federal power should only be a check and balance on abuse of state power and NOTHING MORE in any area that is not an enumerated power. We have moved so far away from this in the past century (incrementally, so without much protest) that I don't believe there is any hope to see the Constitution hit the three century mark in any recognizable form.

 

[MJB_17]

The early results on this poll are about what I expected.

 

[Bmoliv66]

I think the only way national reciprocity would happen would be if they require restrictions making it as hard on everybody as in California, Maryland, New Jersey etc now. That is not want I want... Neither is any mag restrictions

 

[F350]

NO; and it is gun owners like you that got us to where we are today.

 

[oakchas]

Simple answer.

No.

 

[JDFan4010]

NO, also get the US out of the UN & the Feds out of my State!!!

 

[dangerranger]

NO! I will not horse-trade a darn thing. Particularly for national reciprocity ("NR").

1) They have no right to limit mag sizes and limits make no sense anyway;
2) They can steal back anything they want, including NR;
3) NR is a pipe-dream in this day and age;
4) RTC is a state matter; and
5) They are NOT to be trusted

I couldn't have said it better myself!

 

[1MoreGoodGuy]

This is not part of the powers delegated to the federal government by the people so...

No deal.

We already have a deal that cover all of this and it doesn't need to be messed with.

In case you missed it, here it is:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

 

[HotGuns]

Negative.

Right now I dont trust our leaders to do anthing but lie,steal,subvert or do anything at all that is beneficial for this country. Why in the heck would I entrust them with anything else?

 

[ccw9mm]

Right now I dont trust our leaders to do anthing but lie,steal,subvert or do anything at all that is beneficial for this country. Why in the heck would I entrust them with anything else?

You'd be referring to those folks out back who're digging the septic tank, cheating on the invoice, reneging on the contract?